A huge thank you!
This is a discussion on A huge thank you! within the Bob & Terry's Place forums, part of the The Back Porch category; I'm not sure who here will remember but almost 2 years ago I asked the gentlemen of this forum to participate in a study on ...
1Likes
-
1
Post By enk5
-
October 16th, 2012 11:10 AM
#1
Member
Array
A huge thank you!
I'm not sure who here will remember but almost 2 years ago I asked the gentlemen of this forum to participate in a study on relationship satisfaction. I just wanted to thank everyone who participated. I was published in the Journal of Men's Studies this month and I couldn't have done it without your help.
Thank you again everyone!
-Emily
Walther PK380 - SIG Sauer P238 - Glock 19
-
October 16th, 2012 11:10 AM
Remove Ads
-
October 16th, 2012 11:24 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
So many questions... so little nerve.
I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it.
Clint Eastwood
-
October 16th, 2012 01:01 PM
#3
Distinguished Member
Array
I read the Abstract for your paper, looks interesting. From what I can tell, without NMA my friend's tavern would be out of business...
I'd rather be lucky than good any day
There's nothing that will change someone's moral outlook quicker than cash in large sums.
Majority rule only works if you're also considering individual rights. Because you can't have five wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper.
-
October 16th, 2012 01:06 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array
BigJon
"Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" ~ Mark Twain
-
October 20th, 2012 01:04 PM
#5
Senior Member
Array
You stinker! Include a link!
(I published last month, and it's a huge amount of pride that nearly no one understands, lol)
If 'mental illness' is a main cause of gun-grabbing sentiments, then mental illness is the true enemy.
The March of Dimes worked. There's an opportunity there for being pro-active in defense of your rights.
Alternatlvely, please just actually give actual money occasionally.
-
October 20th, 2012 01:07 PM
#6
VIP Member
Array

Sorry, there wasn't a smiley that says "This post is worthless without a link"
Preparing for the Zombie Apocalypse or Rapture....whichever comes first.
-
October 20th, 2012 01:33 PM
#7
Senior Member
Array
If 'mental illness' is a main cause of gun-grabbing sentiments, then mental illness is the true enemy.
The March of Dimes worked. There's an opportunity there for being pro-active in defense of your rights.
Alternatlvely, please just actually give actual money occasionally.
-
October 20th, 2012 03:11 PM
#8
Senior Member
Array
-
October 20th, 2012 08:33 PM
#9
Senior Member
Array
Most scientific studies are, sadly. There's an ongoing movement to make more of them open-access, and it's gaining steam. Luckily, a few journals started that decided to be open-access AND they played their cards right when it came to quality-control, so they have good reputations. A researcher doesn't risk losing face by publishing results to some of the high-quality journals that don't need subscriptions.
If 'mental illness' is a main cause of gun-grabbing sentiments, then mental illness is the true enemy.
The March of Dimes worked. There's an opportunity there for being pro-active in defense of your rights.
Alternatlvely, please just actually give actual money occasionally.
-
October 20th, 2012 11:42 PM
#10
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
CanuckQue
Most scientific studies are, sadly. There's an ongoing movement to make more of them open-access, and it's gaining steam. Luckily, a few journals started that decided to be open-access AND they played their cards right when it came to quality-control, so they have good reputations. A researcher doesn't risk losing face by publishing results to some of the high-quality journals that don't need subscriptions.
If you want to see the mindset of the intellectually dishonest and why the would fight that tooth and nail, the "Final Report" by the East Anglia crowd "clearing" (making excuses for) HadCRU of all wrongdoing makes fun reading. No need to be an expert on climate, just a familiarity with honest research. You would probably end up rolling on the ground, laughing at the weaseling. It's such garbage that I don't think I saved the pdf or the link to the source.
-
October 21st, 2012 08:19 AM
#11
Senior Member
Array
I'm familiar enough with climate sciences that I follow the primary literature. The level at which the wrongdoing was committed is a very important factor when it comes to interpretation. Oceanic acidification happens regardless of how much rolling on the ground that I do. I don't think that defensivecarry is the right place for a discussion regarding climate science, because of its (weirdly) partisan nature, and most people's opinions have been formed after reading a few dozen paragraphs (in total). I'd be happy to see your link, though.
The open-access science that I like are mainly regarding medical and biological studies. One can get a summarizing grasp by reading just abstracts, if they're persistent, but it's much, much better if you've access to the entire text.
For example, a discussion on using diet to reduce the risk of Parkinson's disease is much clearer after seeing a graph, but studies like this are behind a paywall.
If 'mental illness' is a main cause of gun-grabbing sentiments, then mental illness is the true enemy.
The March of Dimes worked. There's an opportunity there for being pro-active in defense of your rights.
Alternatlvely, please just actually give actual money occasionally.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
emily karakis journal of men's studies
, is normative male alexithymia associated with relationship satisfaction, fear of intimacy and communication quality amon