Tenn law: deadly force - forcible rape or kidnapping
This is a discussion on Tenn law: deadly force - forcible rape or kidnapping within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I can't find anything. I'm an instructor and I should know, but I don't. Now I'm going to find out.
Tennessee law allows for the ...
-
April 1st, 2010 01:54 AM
#1
Distinguished Member
Array
Tenn law: deadly force - forcible rape or kidnapping
I can't find anything. I'm an instructor and I should know, but I don't. Now I'm going to find out.
Tennessee law allows for the use of deadly force to prevent death or serious bodily injury to yourself or to another person. Not counting Castle issues, the state issued materials say that this is the only justifiable reason to use deadly force.
The question is, "are forcible rape and/or kidnapping items that would be considered serious bodily injury and would legally justify the use to deadly force in order to prevent or terminate?"
Opinions are welcome. Citations, especially Tennessee related ones, are greatly appreciated.
The preceding post may contain sarcasm; it's just better that way. However, it is still intended with construction and with the Love of my L-rd Y'shua.
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, Tennessee Certified Instructor
-
April 1st, 2010 01:54 AM
Remove Ads
-
April 1st, 2010 02:51 AM
#2
Distinguished Member
Array
In the state of Michigan, if the person is in fear of their life, you can use deadly force. This is how I look at it, if I was being raped or kidnap, would I think that my life is in danger? My answer would be yes.
Glock: G22 .40 S&W
Smith and Wesson: Model 437 .38 Spl, and Sigma SW9VE 9mm

-
April 1st, 2010 02:57 AM
#3
Moderator
Array
This is my opinion as it applies to other states, but I already know it applies in Missouri.
But the answer, to my knowledge is YES forcible rape and kidnapping by it's very definition can cause at the least serious bodily injury. And you have no way of knowing whether it is going to lead to your death, so you have to assume it might and therefore are correct in righteously being in fear of death or serious bodily injury. I believe it passes the "reasonable man" smell test.
-Bark'n
Semper Fi
"The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."
-
April 1st, 2010 03:26 AM
#4
VIP Member
Array
How many rapes and or kidnappings end up in Death,I say yes deadly force is justified
"Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
--Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .
-
April 1st, 2010 06:34 AM
#5
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Bark'n
This is my opinion as it applies to other states, but I already know it applies in Missouri.
But the answer, to my knowledge is YES forcible rape and kidnapping by it's very definition can cause at the least serious bodily injury. And you have no way of knowing whether it is going to lead to your death, so you have to assume it might and therefore are correct in righteously being in fear of death or serious bodily injury. I believe it passes the "reasonable man" smell test.
Well said IMHO.
-
April 1st, 2010 09:47 AM
#6
VIP Member
Array
It is spelled out specifically here, but the inference is clear enough in the TN statute. Those are life threatening crimes. There would have to be very unusual circumstances for a prosecution to try the argument that these are not acts that cause serious bodily injury.
On the rape question, you don't want to see the photo of my sister in-laws face after being beaten to a pulp during a home invasion and rape. There is no way that lethal force would not have been justified under the TN statute.
And, kidnapping is almost always a prelude to murder, especially when it isn't done to collect ransom.
-
April 1st, 2010 01:41 PM
#7
Member
Array
In Pennsylvania, rape and kidnap are spelled out under the lethal force statute. Yes, you may use lethal force to prevent/stop.
-
April 1st, 2010 03:35 PM
#8
VIP Member
Array
I would think that deadly force would be justified to combat rape and kidnapping in about any location. Now if you are in NYC or NJ, Illinois, or places like that you don't have that option as you can't carry a weapon. What a bummer!
-
April 1st, 2010 05:13 PM
#9
Member
Array
Legal deadly force situation in Texas as well.
PC 9.32, 2B)
A person is justificed in using deadly force against another to prevent the other's imminent commission of aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery
Last edited by HuttoAg96; April 1st, 2010 at 05:17 PM.
Reason: added specifics
-
April 1st, 2010 10:14 PM
#10
Member
Array
Remember, in TN the threshold is what a reasonable person in that situation would believe. I think most would agree that it is entirely reasonable to assume that one's life is in danger in either of the proposed situations. And I imagine that it would be very easy to find any number of experts who would testify that such fear is reasonable in these situations. As a former assistant DA, I know it would have to go before a Grand Jury, but I certainly would have a hard time pressing for a True Bill if deadly force were used in either of these instances.
"Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day... Teach a man to fish and he'll spend all his time in the basement tying flies and neglecting his personal hygiene." -- Jimmy James

"
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!!!" -- Admiral James T. Kirk
-
April 1st, 2010 10:49 PM
#11
VIP Member
Array
Never saw a legal definition that included either kidnapping nor rape..... they usually say "reasonable force necessary to stop the attack".
-
April 2nd, 2010 01:18 AM
#12
Member
Array
it seems like a good prosecutor would have a much easier time making a kidnapping more of a fuzzy issue than a rape. rape is pretty clear and easy to define whereas i could see a creative defense attorney finding a way to make a jury see a kidnapping as something else "beyond a reasonable doubt". he wanted to get in the car, we were just joking... who knows. i keep thinking about the post i read here somewhere about the guy that didn't shoot the man taking the little girl away in what appeared to be a highly questionable situation but ultimately it was his daughter. sometimes things aren't what they appear to be.
-
April 2nd, 2010 09:10 AM
#13
Moderator
Array
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
-
April 2nd, 2010 10:36 AM
#14
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
spar10
it seems like a good prosecutor would have a much easier time making a kidnapping more of a fuzzy issue than a rape. rape is pretty clear and easy to define whereas i could see a creative defense attorney finding a way to make a jury see a kidnapping as something else "beyond a reasonable doubt". he wanted to get in the car, we were just joking... who knows. i keep thinking about the post i read here somewhere about the guy that didn't shoot the man taking the little girl away in what appeared to be a highly questionable situation but ultimately it was his daughter. sometimes things aren't what they appear to be.
a creative defense attourney can make a rape look like something else also...i wouldnt be overly concerned about what happens in court...
is there a statute that allows dealy force in the event of a forced felony in your state?...rape and kidnapping are both forcible felonies...
-
April 2nd, 2010 10:53 AM
#15
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
bladenbullet
a creative defense attourney can make a rape look like something else also...i wouldnt be overly concerned about what happens in court...
is there a statute that allows dealy force in the event of a forced felony in your state?...rape and kidnapping are both forcible felonies...
No, forcible felony is not justification for deadly force under Tennessee law. Deadly force may be used to defend against "serious bodily harm" and death (39-11-611). Other than Castle issues, there is no other listed justification.
The preceding post may contain sarcasm; it's just better that way. However, it is still intended with construction and with the Love of my L-rd Y'shua.
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, Tennessee Certified Instructor
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By debrunsky in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Replies: 29
Last Post: January 5th, 2010, 02:19 AM
-
By Terror in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 14
Last Post: November 5th, 2009, 03:24 PM
-
By goldshellback in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
Replies: 4
Last Post: May 6th, 2008, 01:31 PM
-
By Bumper in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Replies: 0
Last Post: June 17th, 2004, 02:17 PM
Search tags for this page
can you use deadly force to stop a rape
, deadly force kidnapping
, deadly force laws in tennessee
, deadly force laws in tn
, deadly force rape
, forcible rape in tennessee
, tennessee deadly force law
, tennessee deadly force laws
, tennessee forcible felony
, tennessee law on deadly force
, tennessee law on using deadly force
, tn deadly force law
, tn deadly force laws
, tn law deadly force sexual assault
, tn law using lethal force