"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned".
This is a discussion on real life scenario, how'd I do? within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned"....
"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned".
OP, you did just what I would have done...
Yeah, I'll be checking my property out without a call to the local authorities, unless a threat has been verified visually, or by sign that I discovered by my own investigation. The sheriffs department has better things to do than go on every wild goose chase some homeowner might come up with. I agree regarding the shotgun, if you have one, that's the weapon to clear the property with IMO.
For the "let um take what they want" guys. Better you than me.Some worthless loser breaks into my house and he/they have disturbed me in my safe zone, those idiots are subject to my wrath at that point. To steal something from my yard, or car is one thing, but once you have breached my home, they have just put their life on the line of their own accord. Not even in a hurry to shoot anyone, or kill anything for that matter, but not going to cower to the possibility of having do so either.
Oh' and not calling anyone a coward either, so don't get all jacked up at something that's not there.. I'm just not gonna contribute to the career criminal. I'll end his poor decision making skills, if he's not smart enough to leave when he hears me moving around..
"He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." – Luke 22:36
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." – Thomas Jefferson
Your interpretation is others' remarks may be off the mark.
For me, I never implied they could have anything. I would immediately call the police to deal with the thief.
The word "cower" you use is the basis for the word coward. You may not have overtly called someone out, but you use emotionally-laden language thats someone *may* infer to be derogatory. I read no remarks where anyone said they would "cower".
For me, I simply refuse to put choke points behind me. It's my personal tactical strategy. I have a large home. If I leave the bedroom that I control to go confront (or attempt to shoot) someone at another place in my house, I am giving up the tactical advantage I have remaining in my bedroom. You may call that "cowering" - I call it playing it smart. I'm not interesting in defending a TV or plate silver with my life like others may choose to do.
"He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." – Luke 22:36
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." – Thomas Jefferson
Thank you for your nice post. I simply wanted to point out that the verb "cower" may even be technically correct, but it could easily be misinterpreted. I prefer to say I remain vigilant in my tactically superior defensive position attempting to prevail in this dire situation by intelligent use of my limited resources. You can call it cowering if you wish.
So did your fiancee give you something a little extra special that night? If so, then good job.
I certainly wouldn't consider it pursuing and since the suspect has already breached private property he just became an aggressor. Nothing "possible" about it.
I see your plan and that is fine. However, I cannot see how you would justify a reprimand against someone else whose decision is different.
What's flimsy about someone sneaking around your property, at night, whom you did not invite? You carry a gun to be safe? Safe from what? Who? Do you wait to be fired upon to use your gun in self defense?
“I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.”
- Barack Obama Chicago Tribune, April 27, 2004
How long does it take law enforcement to respond in your area and what kind of work load do they have?
In many areas they might be able to get there quicker than you and I never knew one that minded making sure a lady home alone was OK when things go "bump in the night".
Good to know they are already on the way of things go sour before you get there too.
Jim
The OP was about confronting someone leaving your house with your possessions. If I can avoid a confrontation, I ALWAYS opt for that course of action. It's simply safer.
My wife and I also have a moral compunction about taking a life over property. We insure our homes and possessions. If anything is stolen (as has been the case in the past), we invoke our insurance policy to replace the items. Nothing I own - and I mean NOTHING - is worth a gunfight.
Many people here mistakenly assume they are going to prevail in any gunfight. I know better. I have grown older and wiser. No one wins in a gunfight. You are never guaranteed to prevail in a confrontation of any type. If a confrontation can be avoided - even in my own home - I will come down on the side of safety.
YMMV.
MadMac, tactically secure defensive position? You have been hanging around some of my coworkers lol. Just joshing you a bit. I again agree with MadMac, its just property, have her go to the bedroom, look out windows, etc if someone is for sure coming in. However if an alarm is tripped, I see no harm in grabbing a weapon and investigating.
"The value you put on the lost will be determined by the sacrifice you are willing to make to seek them until they are found."