You decide to act, which threat do you stop first?
This is a discussion on You decide to act, which threat do you stop first? within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; That's way too open to answer....
October 29th, 2011 12:50 AM
That's way too open to answer.
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --- Will Rogers ---
Chief Justice John Roberts : "I don't see how you can read Heller and not take away from it the notion that the Second Amendment...was extremely important to the framers in their view of what liberty meant."
October 29th, 2011 04:59 AM
I did not know that there was news video, post if you wish. Wife saw the news and passed on the cliff notes of the incident. Had I know there was video, I would not have posted anyways since the particulars of the BGs were what I wanted this thread focused on.
Originally Posted by tomtsr
That is what got me to thinking of how would you deal with that dynamic of 1 focused BG and the other twitchy. A bit of a conundrum, so I thew it out here for some honest opinions.
Seems the consensus here is eliminate the calm BG and hope for the best with twitchy.
That would be the conundrum I was wrestling with.
Originally Posted by Eaglebeak
Grasseater // Grass~eat~er noun, often attributive \ˈgras-ē-tər\
A person who is incapable of independent thought; a person who is herd animal-like in behavior; one who cannot distinguish between right and wrong; a foolish person.
See also Sheep
October 29th, 2011 08:21 AM
Just messin with you guys , but for sure I would "double tap" the nervous guy first ,he's your first and foremost threat because you really dont know where he stands! the Other guy just take him out ! Personally speaking I dont need the heroics or the press , if I was a customer , I would prpbably leave the scene and let the cops figure it out , my job was done! If I owned the shop , I would be soiling my britches because if one of those losers lived I would be in court blowing my entire savings and business fighting the city and some defense attorney for killing there client and because the city would have to by law file charges of manslaughter at best against me!
Thats why I said as a customer I did my job , c'ya down the road and ya dont need to thank me!
Last edited by JD; October 30th, 2011 at 04:20 PM.
Reason: addressed via PM.
October 29th, 2011 09:21 AM
Originally Posted by 5thMarines
You're doing it again aren't you...
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." — Thomas Jefferson
October 29th, 2011 10:19 AM
I think it is a good post. I looked for the video on the news site and it wasn't there. I saw the clip during the broadcast.
I love what if scenarios, but this is why they are so difficult. They play our so much differently. I find myself playing out a situation in many ways from differing angles for that very reason.
Train like your life depends on it, because it does.
NRA Life Member
October 29th, 2011 06:50 PM
I ain't got time to figure out no OODA loop; I'm just shooting both and sorting it out afterwards.
Retired USAF E-8. Lighten up and enjoy life because:
Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid...
Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth
October 30th, 2011 01:07 AM
Originally Posted by 5thMarines
Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~Paul Howe
October 30th, 2011 04:22 PM
I would point behind them and say "Hey, did you see that hottie?" And as they turned to look I'd give 'em each 460 grains of lead as an appetizer...
Trust in God and keep your powder dry
"A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -source
October 30th, 2011 08:13 PM
My general consideration for situations like these is to initiate the engagement and start shooting. However, there are just too many factors you are going to have to take in and process as things are going down to really say exactly what I would do.
One of the first things one wants to do when facing multiple gunners is to get off the friggon X in an explosive burst as you initiate your draw. When you go to shootin, you don't want to be standing in the same place you were previously.
One of the other things you want to try and process as you are doing that, is Can you line them up (one in front of the other) as you are moving off the X? That will dictate how you move off the X. If your movements can line them up so the second guy loses a good line of fire, so much the better.
Now, without being there, as it plays out, you have no idea if being behind the counter will allow that type of movement to take place or not. If you can't get off the X in such a way that lines them up single file, but only put distance between the three of you, which direction are you going to move, and which one of them are going to be the closest?
These are going to be the kinds of things I will be trying to process as I make my decision. If things look all out of whack, I may just hold tight and see what other kinds of actions they make to give me more data to process.
As I said, my natural inclination based on my mindset and how I've trained to engage such encounters is to go ahead and commences shooting. But, there's a lot of data I'm processing which helps me make the final determination.
Now some people are not going to understand what I'm trying to convey here, and others might think it's bunk. But realistically, these things are pretty fluid and dynamic situations and because they are, I have a pre-determined idea of how I'm going to respond. That helps in a quick and decisive reaction. But I am in no way going to exclude evaluating the unknown things I can't foresee until I'm actually in the middle of it and see how it plays out.
"The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."
October 31st, 2011 01:00 AM
Great! Evidence tampering!
Originally Posted by 5thMarines
You know that is against the law, right?
- know the difference
is a fancy name for crappy fighter
You have never lived until you have almost died. For those that have fought for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know