Home intruder: do you have to announce that you're armed?

This is a discussion on Home intruder: do you have to announce that you're armed? within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; The PA system in my house has an audible alarm that lets everyone know that an important message is about to be broadcast of the ...

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 345678 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 113
Like Tree92Likes

Thread: Home intruder: do you have to announce that you're armed?

  1. #91
    VIP Member Array BugDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Gulf Coast of Florida
    Posts
    9,332
    The PA system in my house has an audible alarm that lets everyone know that an important message is about to be broadcast of the Public Address system. This is common in hospitals and other public places before various codes are announced to let people know to stop and listen to the important message. My pre-message alarm happens to be "bang! bang!" Then followed by, "May I have your attention please. By breaking into my house you won a special prize delivered personally to you at 1200 feet per second. I hope you enjoyed your brief stay in my humble abode. Clean-up on aisle 4."
    Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
    No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.


    Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #92
    Distinguished Member Array onacoma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    1,322
    Quote Originally Posted by l1a1 View Post
    This is only applicable if you are indeed a feller with your hair colored yellow.
    I beleive the perpetrator with my wife needs to have the hair color yellow!

    For myself, I've had a few colors but never yellow! But now after these years and the fact that I've been rode hard and put away wet so many times, it has faded to over 50 shades of grey! Or was that a book my wife was reading? I'd hate to be the guy who broke in while she reading!


    In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress. -- John Adams

    If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -- P.J. O'Rourke

  4. #93
    New Member Array Steinmetzify's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The mountains of Utah
    Posts
    14
    Residents of Utah are allowed to use lethal force to stop a forcible felony....someone breaks in my house, I might shout a warning but I don't have to.
    What immortal hand or eye
    Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

  5. #94
    Distinguished Member Array tcox4freedom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina USA
    Posts
    1,523
    Quote Originally Posted by Harryball View Post
    1st: Know your state laws and how they apply..

    2nd: Never, ever, give a verbal warning to someone breaking into your home. You job is not to play fair. Your job is to keep this individual from killing you and your family...
    ^^^THIS^^^ x1000

    I've been a victim of several "attempted" burglaries while at home; and I've been victim to two HIR's. I can tell you in a burglary attempt you may have a chance to call 911 & announce your intent to defend yourself. (maybe?)

    HOWEVER!!!!

    In an HIR you may not have time to do anything!

    Sometimes you may have a second or two to react. But, if you SA is a little off and you're faced with a professional HIR hit team, you may not even have that.

    Personally, we had time to call 911 in the burglaries. But, my stepfather & I had to fight in the HIRs. (Calls to 911 came after it was over.)

    -

  6. #95
    New Member Array btanchors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    6
    Here's my $0.02:

    First off, I agree with several other posters in that the laws vary from state to state. In addition, as part of preparation, might be worth it to consult with an attorney familiar with the laws in your location, and closely involved with these types of cases, to discuss potential scenarios so that you are well-informed. Having gotten that out of the way:

    There is no question from a tactical point of view you're better off not announcing ANYTHING. Also, if you feel your life or the life of your family is threatened, you do what you have to to protect your lives.

    However, your question was about the law.

    If I were a prosecuting attorney in this case, assuming it went to trial, I would argue the following, or some variant:

    1) The person "illegally" entering the domicile was drunk/mentally ill/or otherwise of diminished mental capacity and simply entered the wrong house. Therefore the shooting was a disproportionate use of force, as the entrant had no ill purpose. Sure, the house was locked, but I doubt that would be a significant mitigating factor with a jury.

    2) The person "illegally" entering the house thought no one was home, and intended only to steal property, NOT to cause bodily harm - therefore the shooting was disproportionate use of force.

    In a criminal case, it would depend on what the laws are in your locality as to whether defense would prevail.

    In a CIVIL case, I would bet the case would be a 50/50 chance, and would depend on the skills of the attorneys on each side as to who would prevail.

    I'm not saying this is right, or makes sense, but this is how I see it.

    Like I said, you do what you have to if you think your life is threatened.

    I am not an expert, or an attorney, but I do believe considering these types of scenarios in advance is very useful.
    tacman605 likes this.

  7. #96
    VIP Member Array mprp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,886
    Quote Originally Posted by l1a1 View Post
    Quote - If I catch a guy spooning my wife on the dance floor of at our local bar am I obligated to give him three steps if he ask for that favor?

    You must, by law comply with said request only if a. he is referring to you by a masculine identifier, b. requesting your patience for no longer than 60 seconds, c. insists vehemently that he and your wife did NOT engage in a public display of affection being of the open mouthed OR closed mouth variety and d. he doesn't desire you to be a source of difficulty. This is only applicable if you are indeed a feller with your hair colored yellow.
    It may not be a law to comply with said request. However, it IS an action much obliged at times 'cause I'm tellin' you son well it ain't no fun starin' straight down a .44.

    EDIT: Added link for those who've never heard it before. You can also play it from here LYNYRD SKYNYRD LYRICS - Gimme Three Steps
    Last edited by mprp; August 10th, 2012 at 02:12 PM.
    Vietnam Vets, WELCOME HOME

    Crossman 760 BB/Pellet, Daisy Red Ryder, Crossman Wrist Rocket, 14 Steak Knives, 3 Fillet Knives, Rolling Pin-14", Various Hunting Knives, 2 Baseball Bats, 3 Big Dogs and a big American Flag flying in the yard. I have no firearms; Try the next house.

  8. #97
    Member Array H8SPVMT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    264
    That locked door was there for a reason, to prevent you from getting in harms way: my loose bullets!
    Certified Glock Armorer

  9. #98
    Member Array Pistoldoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by dukalmighty View Post
    In TX they break into my house,I announce I have a gun with bang bang bang bang bang and continue until the threat is stopped
    As far as any "LAWSUITS" In Tx if he Unlawfully entered your home and you killed or wounded him neither him or his family can sue you,my state doesn't reward criminals for felonious acts
    Yep! Another reason why I love this state.
    "The Second Amendment isn't about protecting ourselves against criminals. It's about all of us protecting ourselves from all of you." ---Dr. Suzanne Gratia Hupp to Congressman Charles Schumer (D-NY), 1994**

  10. #99
    Member Array CPanther95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    237
    Quote Originally Posted by btanchors View Post
    Here's my $0.02:

    First off, I agree with several other posters in that the laws vary from state to state. In addition, as part of preparation, might be worth it to consult with an attorney familiar with the laws in your location, and closely involved with these types of cases, to discuss potential scenarios so that you are well-informed. Having gotten that out of the way:

    There is no question from a tactical point of view you're better off not announcing ANYTHING. Also, if you feel your life or the life of your family is threatened, you do what you have to to protect your lives.

    However, your question was about the law.

    If I were a prosecuting attorney in this case, assuming it went to trial, I would argue the following, or some variant:

    1) The person "illegally" entering the domicile was drunk/mentally ill/or otherwise of diminished mental capacity and simply entered the wrong house. Therefore the shooting was a disproportionate use of force, as the entrant had no ill purpose. Sure, the house was locked, but I doubt that would be a significant mitigating factor with a jury.

    2) The person "illegally" entering the house thought no one was home, and intended only to steal property, NOT to cause bodily harm - therefore the shooting was disproportionate use of force.

    In a criminal case, it would depend on what the laws are in your locality as to whether defense would prevail.

    In a CIVIL case, I would bet the case would be a 50/50 chance, and would depend on the skills of the attorneys on each side as to who would prevail.

    I'm not saying this is right, or makes sense, but this is how I see it.

    Like I said, you do what you have to if you think your life is threatened.

    I am not an expert, or an attorney, but I do believe considering these types of scenarios in advance is very useful.
    Fortunately in SC we don't have to worry about those kinds of idiotic cases being made. Not only is the shooting justified, but you are immune from both criminal and civil actions.

  11. #100
    Ex Member Array barstoolguru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    under a rock in area 51
    Posts
    2,548
    There has been a number of cases in Texas were the homeowner has shot through the door w/o an entry and still a N/B by the GD (everything in Texas goes through the GD)

  12. #101
    Senior Member Array Lish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    764
    Here in FL you also can't be sued for killing or wounding someone who unlawfully enters your home.

    Even better is our sheriff is a big believer in people defending themselves. Just a couple months ago, some drunk guy was banging on a door to be let in and screaming. For some reason the homeowner opened his door and when he did the drunk guy charged through the screen door and came into the home. The homeowner ended up shooting and killing the drunk guy after a confrontation. The sheriff's response in the paper was 'Cornwell "did exactly what he should have done. He protected himself, his wife and his family." I can't tell you how many times I've read similiar quotes from our sheriff when there's a story about a home invasion that ends with the bad guy getting shot. I called the police out here once to report a problem and the deputy's exact words were "m'am you got you a gun?" (At the time the answer was no) and he responded "well you better get you one" and proceeded to make recommendations.

    I'd like to think I wouldn't announce anything. From a tactical standpoint it doesn't seem like a good idea and I'm not required to do so. It's hard to say though, in the heat of it - I can see me yelling to get out. When I practice drawing from the holster maybe I should also work on biting my tongue. My biggest concern is if I yell out that either my kids will come to see what's going on or I'll lose any advantage with the BG I may have.

  13. #102
    VIP Member Array sixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    indiana usa
    Posts
    2,563
    I will announce to the bg with the muzzle blast from my firearm.

  14. #103
    VIP Member Array Eagleks's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    7,636
    Nope......
    I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --- Will Rogers ---
    Chief Justice John Roberts : "I don't see how you can read Heller and not take away from it the notion that the Second Amendment...was extremely important to the framers in their view of what liberty meant."

  15. #104
    VIP Member
    Array tacman605's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Arkansas/On the X in Afghanistan
    Posts
    3,031
    To the OP in response to your question. No there is not a requirement to announce.

    Before I start this remember this is what I would do not anyone else.

    First point is, as multiple people have stated, know your states laws. Yes your state may have the castle doctrine and that may be where your reading stopped in the manual but part of that may be "You must be in fear for your life or grievous bodily harm" before using force so again know your laws.

    Secondly. As has been stated if the person is in the act of breaking in, i.e. still outside, yes a warning would be given. I am not going to shoot through the door, go outside and hunt him down or anything else. Should after the warning is given, from a position of cover, he continue to enter I would take whatever action needed to protect myself and my loved ones. Should he choose to leave great! Police come, file a report event is over and hopefully he is caught.

    Lastly if the person is already in the house I would, again from a position of cover, give a verbal warning while having my weapon oriented toward the person. Could I legally shoot without it? Probably but I would rather give the suspect the option to stop that cap a 15 year old who broke in my house on a dare from his buddies. I also look at it this way. I will not fire without positively identifying my target. This includes using a WML to see the person before I fire. One to identify him and second to assure I make the most accurate shot possible given the circumstance.

    Unless the bad guy or guys are walking around with a weapon in their hand that act of identifying them with the light or giving a warning does not put me at a tactical disadvantage due to the fact that I already have my weapon indexed and ready to fire. Action beats reaction everytime.

    It is very easy to fall into the mindset of "Yep let someone break in and I will cap him in a heartbeat" but situations like this are not always black and white. If the suspect is presenting a clear and immediate threat by all means take action but I have the advantage in this situation so why not use it. Everyone has to make their own decision in regards to this and there is not one correct cut and dried answer to every situation.

    As I stated the warning would be given only if there was no immediate threat presented. To me a drunk in my living room who entered the wrong house does not meet that criteria of an immediate threat but things can change in a instant so you have to be prepared for the worst.
    "A first rate man with a third rate gun is far better than the other way around". The gun is a tool, you are the craftsman that makes it work. There are those who say "if I had to do it, I could" yet they never go out and train to do it. Don't let stupid be your mindset. Harryball 2013

  16. #105
    Senior Member Array Weeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by tacman605 View Post
    It is very easy to fall into the mindset of "Yep let someone break in and I will cap him in a heartbeat" but situations like this are not always black and white.

    So true.

    I got flailed on in another forum for saying this in so many words in reply to a 'scenario-based' question.


    I also like to live by the mantra: "your words (verbal or online) are like bullets...once they leave the muzzle, you can't call them back."


    :)

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 345678 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

can i shoot an intruder in my house
,
can you kill a home intruder
,
can you kill an intruder in your home
,
can you shoot an intruder in florida
,
can you shoot an intruder in new york state
,
can you shoot an intruder in your home
,
can you shoot an intruder in your home in florida
,

can you shoot someone who breks into your house in north carolina

,

can you shoot someone who enters your home

,
do gun owners have to warn intruder before shooting
,

do you have the right to kill an intruder

,
do you have the right to shoot an intruder
Click on a term to search for related topics.