Would you intervene with deadly force on a stranger's behalf?(poll added) - Page 6

Would you intervene with deadly force on a stranger's behalf?(poll added)

This is a discussion on Would you intervene with deadly force on a stranger's behalf?(poll added) within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Although I voted yes in the poll. the real answer is, it depends. Would you have to leave your family unprotected? Even for a short ...

View Poll Results: Would you intervene with deadly force on a stranger's behalf?

Voters
150. You may not vote on this poll
  • YES

    116 77.33%
  • NO

    34 22.67%
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 107
Like Tree69Likes

Thread: Would you intervene with deadly force on a stranger's behalf?(poll added)

  1. #76
    StarPD45
    Guest StarPD45's Avatar
    Although I voted yes in the poll. the real answer is, it depends.
    Would you have to leave your family unprotected? Even for a short time? To protect a stranger?
    The possibilities, like the answers, are endless.


  2. #77
    Distinguished Member Array BigStick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    Posts
    1,455
    I answered the poll "yes" because there are some cases where I would. But I would have prefered an "it depends" option, because that is the real answer. It would need to be an obvious sittuation, and it is still scary, because what sometimes seems obvious, is wrong.

    My budy almost got into a messy sittuation where he heard screams, saw a guy on top of a girl in a ditch beating her. He intervened, but it turned out the girl was trying to kill herself with a knife and the guy was strugling with her trying to stop it. But she stopped trying when my buddy showed up. He thought he was trying to stop the guy, and held him off at gunpoint until they were able to explain the sittuation, then the guy and the rest of the family got real upset and jumpy and kept pressuring my buddy to drop the gun and leave them alone, but the girl on the ground was asking for help. So he was in a real messy sittuation until the police showed up that could have ended badly.

    Would I have intervened in the same sittuation? Probably, but as I said, it can get really messy, even when it seems straightforward.
    Walk softly ...

  3. #78
    Member Array BigFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Merrimack, NH
    Posts
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by tacman605 View Post
    I fully realize that there are many variables and each situation is different however IMO everyone should already have an answer before ever putting on a gun.
    I think the question speaks to a much larger philosophical debate, which can not and should not be answered with an single Yes or No response. Ultimately I think as an individual I'd have to say "More than likely not", but would never say never.

    Sometimes there is never a right answer, and sometimes there is never a wrong answer.
    Just because you can, should you?
    Just because you should, can you?
    Is it legally right but morally wrong?
    Is it morally right but legally wrong?


    As individuals I don't think we have any obligation to help anyone else, other than perhaps our own children up until the point they are able to help themselves. It may be in our best interest to do so in many situations, either individually or more likely from a larger social context. It may also not be in our best interest, but have some sort of desire or sense of self duty to do so anyway. I genuinely care about others in various less than "good" situations, ranging from the benign bad day at work to the other extreme of being under direct threat of violence/death, but that doesn't translate to obligation to help them, or define who when where why I would or wouldn't help.
    "Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense."
    Ron Paul.

  4. #79
    VIP Member
    Array tacman605's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Arkansas/On the X in Afghanistan
    Posts
    3,053
    BigFish. There is absolutely no obligation to help you are correct.

    Hopefully we as individuals have thought about the basic premise though, it all has to start somewhere.
    "A first rate man with a third rate gun is far better than the other way around". The gun is a tool, you are the craftsman that makes it work. There are those who say "if I had to do it, I could" yet they never go out and train to do it. Don't let stupid be your mindset. Harryball 2013

  5. #80
    Member Array TangoDelta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama
    Posts
    60
    Tough question...no matter what I answer right now, in the comfort of my office, I' would probably do something different in the heat of the situation.

  6. #81
    Member Array GHFLRLTD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    241

    Like Fellow Floridian OldVet

    I would intervene, based on the concept that though I may not be the initial or primary threatened individual, I am responsible for my own personal security, and by inference the security of the space and time I am in. If the legal conditions for using deadly force are met, and as long as they are met, it would be a tactical decision on if it was possible to fire.
    George H. Foster
    Orlando, Florida

  7. #82
    Member Array tony1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    454
    YES - even if I did not have my weapon with me. `

  8. #83
    Distinguished Member Array Bill MO's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,465
    Quote Originally Posted by tony1990 View Post
    YES - even if I did not have my weapon with me. `
    You and your mind are the weapon, anything else that you use are only tools.
    tacman605 and ccw9mm like this.
    It's gotta be who you are, not a hobby. reinman45

    "Is this persons bad behavior worth me having to kill them over?" Guantes

  9. #84
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27,083
    Perhaps. Depends on the situation and circumstances.

    If with my family and needing to protect them first, very likely not, and almost certainly not if any of them were at direct risk of harm from the situation.

    If out on my own, perhaps, so long as I felt there was a good chance of my making a difference and being able to successfully assist (including avoiding collateral damage, surviving the encounter).

    Frankly, if we as a culture rewarded such folks consistently and protectively for their aid and assistance, I'm sure we'd have people willing to step up in many (most?) situations without so many qualms. But in this climate of lawsuits, do-gooder DA's and statutes that encourage backlash on those left standing, particularly after willingly and knowingly jumping into the fray, much has conspired to ensure that sometimes it's just not worth it. Sad, but it's reality.
    tacman605 and tundra like this.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  10. #85
    Distinguished Member Array zamboni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    North of the Line
    Posts
    1,206
    I answered maybe

    You never really know how you will react to a situation until it rears its evil self.

    Heck some people wouldn't simply volunteer any information as to what they saw as a witness to LEO's to help someone out. Now you want them to intervene?

    Depending on the real life circumstance, some people that answered yes may not and those that answered no just may. As I’m sure that there might be a few here that CCW, and may not be able to actually shoot someone if the need may ever come to light someday. Some have experienced trained military personnel and LEO’s freeze under fire, so no one can really tell how they will react in real time life; until their clock strikes 12.

    Would I intervene? Maybe yes, maybe no? It all depends on what the situation is? But I would definitely call the police and volunteer any information as to what I saw as a witness to LEO's.

    Then again, if one of my loved ones was in a situation and, there was someone there that could do something to help them out, I would want them to intervene.

    Wouldn’t we all?

  11. #86
    Senior Member Array Fausty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    oshkosh wisconsin
    Posts
    959
    i hate to say it, but i would probably only shoot second if the gun was pointed at someone else. you just never know. could be an airsoft gun. could be something other than what it looks like. i answered no. but it could be yes. just really depends. bottom line, i would not stand by and watch people die, but i would not start shooting at what i assume is someone using deadly force by pointing a weapon at someone else.

    i am not a cop. it is not my job to stop a robbery (which is the most likely scenario in this question). it is my job to keep myself and my family alive.



    edit: 500 posts on this one. i am now a senior member. look at that...
    My metal band: Born under Sirius

    Glock 23, mic holster, clipdraw, abdominal carry.

  12. #87
    Member Array wingit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    126
    I do not think I could live with myself if I knew someone died and I could have possibly prevented it. That doesn't mean I would go John Wayne on someone's ass. Cause every case is different. But to answer the question..... If I was justified and knew with 100% certainty my bullet would not hit anyone but the perp and there is no other solution then bang bang he's dead!

  13. #88
    VIP Member
    Array BenGoodLuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,209
    Quote Originally Posted by NiceAsh View Post
    How can you truthfully answer a Hypothetical Question? There are so many variables, and every situation is different.
    You can simplify the situation by deciding: would you ever intervene with deadly force on a stranger's behalf. If you cannot picture yourself ever intervening, then the answer is '"no". But if you can think of a situation where you might intervene, then you can honestly answer "yes".
    tacman605 likes this.
    Ben

    Cogito, ergo armatum sum. I think, therefore I am armed. (Don Mann, The Modern Day Gunslinger; the ultimate handgun training manual)


  14. #89
    VIP Member Array SIGguy229's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Kommie-fornia-stan
    Posts
    7,080
    Like most answers to hypothetical questions, "it depends" (unfortunately, that wasn't one of the answers)

    Philosophically, I would want to--however, we live in a world with consequences. This is not how I would have answered the questions 10-15 years ago. Experience and wisdom are great teachers.

    On the battlefield, deployed in a faraway land--you bet. I'll go to the wall to defend a stranger (wearing a U.S. service tape, or allied uniform; or even a host nation civilian)

    At home, "it depends"

    As explained in other threads, you don't know the totality of circumstances between two combatants. Domestic violence between two family members is not anything I want to get in the middle of...(God bless you LEOs who do)

    If it was a circumstance of "mutual protection"--like the Colorado movie theater scenario where one guy is looking to kill everyone--then yes, I would use deadly force to defend a stranger.

    A Yes/No poll question doesn't address the spectrum of answers--maybe adding "It depends..." would be helpful.
    Magazine <> clip - know the difference

    martyr is a fancy name for crappy fighter
    You have never lived until you have almost died. For those that have fought for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know

  15. #90
    VIP Member Array glockman10mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    8,960
    Quote Originally Posted by First Sgt View Post
    My Pastor is preaching a funeral tomorrow in Alabama for his 31 yr old nephew. Nephew and five friends went out to celebrate the nephews birthday. Nephew is married, with a young son. Nephew has a younger brother to whom he has been a mentor and caretaker since childhood. Back to the "celebration". About 3 o'clock in the morning, the revelers came out of the local pub into the parking lot. All were quite inebriated. The nephew made a comment of some sort to his "BEST" friend, one of the five. The "BEST" friend took the comment the wrong way and decked the nephew. The "BEST" friend jumped on him and began beating him about the face and head with his fists. The others pulled the "BEST" friend off the nephew, the "BESt" friend broke loose from them and again jumped on the unconscious nephew. He beat him to death with his fists. HE BEAT HIM TO DEATH WITH HIS FISTS. This is a true story, that happened Saturday nite/Sunday morn. The "BEST" friend has very little recollection of the events because of his extreme drunken state. The "BEST" friend was absolutely devastated when told of the happenings and why he was in jail.

    Things happen that we either have no control over, or have little or no knowledge of the situation. If I had come upon the scene above, would I have intervened, YES! Physically first, even though I'm an ole timer. But, if, he had pulled away from me like he did the group, then I think regardless of the circumstances, I would have STOPPED the "BEST" friend from beating the nephew to death with his fists.

    As others have said...the situation would HAVE to be CRYSTAL clear to intervene on behalf of another...or would it? My answer is "YES" to the OP...JMO
    With best friends like that, who needs enemies?
    Ignorance is a long way from stupid, but left unchecked, can get there real fast.

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

arkansas right to use deadly force
,
can you use deadly force to protect a child
,

can you use deadly force to protect others

,
can you use deadly force to protect your children from their father
,
ccw use of deadly force
,
draw your gun to intervene or not to intervene
,
hypothetical situations for the use of deadly force
,
in oregon can a person who ccw use deadly force to protect a stranger
,

wa state deadly force laws

,
washington state use of lethal force
,

when can you use deadly force in arkansas

,
would you intervene stranger
Click on a term to search for related topics.