great question I dont know the answer to - Page 2

great question I dont know the answer to

This is a discussion on great question I dont know the answer to within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Well if I take the gun from him what's to say he won't take it right back?...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: great question I dont know the answer to

  1. #16
    VIP Member Array paaiyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,106
    Well if I take the gun from him what's to say he won't take it right back?
    atctimmy likes this.
    My blog

    WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.


  2. #17
    VIP Member
    Array OldVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Hiding inside a bottle of Jim Beam Black.
    Posts
    17,309
    It depends. What does your state law say about use of deadly force and under what conditions? It varies from state to state. Has case law been established in a situation such as this? And finally, did you need to use deadly force to stop the threat, or did you use it because the balance of power shifted in your direction?

    Quoting "disparity of force" and such doesn't apply equally in every state, not does what constitutes allowable use of deadly force.
    Retired USAF E-8. Lighten up and enjoy life because:
    Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield

  3. #18
    Distinguished Member Array kelcarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    charleston, SC
    Posts
    1,907
    Quote Originally Posted by phreddy View Post
    I believe the statute that the current law is based on was first legal code in 1896. Other than that, I dont know any other history of it.
    Thanks ph. Still confused how this came up in 1896, but there are many things in SC that confuse me since I am only a lowly comya and not a binya. Personally, imminent threat is still number one, nighttime or not. Stuff is just not worth someone's life as much as the idea that I am being robbed wants me to make sure the BG will never do this again.

  4. #19
    VIP Member
    Array atctimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gastonville
    Posts
    6,683
    Here is the only law that matters: SURVIVE! Do whatever you have to do to survive. Worry about laws and all that other crap AFTER you survive.


    If you are in a fight with an armed man and you are able to wrestle the gun away from him then heck yes, shoot him with it. You would still be in a fight with the guy at that point and he would be trying to get his gun back or to hurt you. This is a no brainer. SERIOUSLY, THIS IS A NO BRAINER. YOU ARE FIGHTING WITH A GUY WHO IS STILL TRYING TO KILL YOU. How do you know he doesn't have another weapon to use on you?

    The exception would be if he cut and ran as soon as you got control of the gun. If he stops fighting and runs then let him go.
    ccw9mm and Echo_Four like this.
    It is surely true that you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. Nor can you make them grateful for your efforts.

  5. #20
    VIP Member
    Array archer51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    22,170
    If he is still attacking, I would say yes, your justified in the use of deadly force. ! he is trying to get his weapon back, and 2 you have no idea if the gun was the only weapon he had. If after disarming him he attempts to flea, that puts a different light on the subject and will depend on the DA and your state laws.
    Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.

    USAF Retired
    NRA Life Member

  6. #21
    Member Array BelaOkmyx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by paaiyan View Post
    Well if I take the gun from him what's to say he won't take it right back?
    All right, let's say it was your gun to begin with and he is confronting you with belligerence, are you right to shoot him because of the chance he might take your gun?

    Probably not, although if he definitely was trying to take your gun you absolutely cannot let him have it and it would be better to shoot than to give it up. That's how I see the Martin vs. Zimmerman thing- Z. was losing the fist part of the fight and M. is one of the last people you would ever want to have a firearm.

    So it probably depends on what happens next. If I were to take a gun off a belligerent person my first instinct would be to unload it and clear it. Shooting it would be a last resort because I don't know anything about this gun; it could be damaged or have the wrong ammo in it. This is also a rare, hypothetical situation- better to avoid any shooting until you are sure *** is going on, in my opinion.

  7. #22
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27,866
    Quote Originally Posted by BelaOkmyx View Post
    All right, let's say it was your gun to begin with and he is confronting you with belligerence, are you right to shoot him because of the chance he might take your gun?
    Absolutely, if by "belligerence" you mean what the statutes generally mean in the use-of-force sections: violence to the point of legitimizing one's fear of impending death or crippling injury because of it. Same as always.

    Short of that, you're right, there's no call for putting down the dog. But if it meets the normal, everyday statutory definitions for use-of-force that always apply, then there's no reason to suggest a person's lawful authority to put the dog down is any different than it ever is.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  8. #23
    Distinguished Member Array Hodad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Roswell, GA
    Posts
    1,601
    C'mon people why in the world would you shoot him IF he has been neutralized and is no longer a threat? Especially if he is running away.

    Because he may have bloodied your nose and you are pissed? That is really no reason to shoot someone.

    That being said:

    If, for some reason, you do decide to shoot him make sure you shoot him somewhere besides in the back and make sure he is dead.
    "Life is tough but it's really tough if you are stupid"

  9. #24
    VIP Member Array farronwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Hodad View Post
    C'mon people why in the world would you shoot him IF he has been neutralized and is no longer a threat? Especially if he is running away.

    Because he may have bloodied your nose and you are pissed? That is really no reason to shoot someone.

    That being said:

    If, for some reason, you do decide to shoot him make sure you shoot him somewhere besides in the back and make sure he is dead.
    Again, it all depends on what state you are in and what the laws of that state are.

    What do you consider neutralized? Just because he is going away from you after he saw a gun or you took the gun from him. Maybe he is looking for cover so he can get to his gun/knife whatever and resume the attack. Also, there is nothing in the statutes for our state that state where you can shoot someone. I may be wrong, but I don't know of any laws that say you can only shoot someone in the middle of the chest, or to do otherwise automatically makes a justified shoot unjustified.

    Making them dead is debateable. If you shoot to stop the threat, and they don't die do you keep pumping rounds in them until they are dead? If they live and are a general scum bag, pretty good chance they are if they are attacking you, but they have a history of criminal behavior, who do you think will be believed during the investigation. My money goes on the person defending themself from the scum bag.
    Just remember that shot placement is much more important with what you carry than how big a bang you get with each trigger pull.
    www.ddchl.com
    Texas CHL Instructor
    Texas Hunter Education Instructor
    NRA Instructor

  10. #25
    Member Array BelaOkmyx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by ccw9mm View Post
    Absolutely, if by "belligerence" you mean what the statutes generally mean in the use-of-force sections: violence to the point of legitimizing one's fear of impending death or crippling injury because of it. Same as always.

    Short of that, you're right, there's no call for putting down the dog. But if it meets the normal, everyday statutory definitions for use-of-force that always apply, then there's no reason to suggest a person's lawful authority to put the dog down is any different than it ever is.
    By "belligerence" I mean the English-language use of the word, looking for a fight. "You MF, I hate you," shaking his fist, etc. There is a chance he is going to be able to beat me up and take the gun, which of course I cannot let happen. But I would have to be completely sure that is exactly what is going to happen before firing a shot. Sure, as in he's on top of me beating me and the lights are going out.

    I guess it makes a difference who the defender is. A small woman who will definitely lose the fight and the gun might get away with shooting, while with someone like me who is huge a jury isn't going to buy that I had physical fear for my life from an unarmed person. It's an awful situation for sure, when there's a gun anywhere in the area. Given the legal ramifications I'd rather lose a fistfight than win a gunfight.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

defensivecarry.com daffyduc

Click on a term to search for related topics.