Nightmares (or pipe dreams) About Prosecution for Self-Defense **Merged**

This is a discussion on Nightmares (or pipe dreams) About Prosecution for Self-Defense **Merged** within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Ragin, I tend to agree with most of what you said... The only thing I disagree is that it is selfish to not do anything. ...

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 50 of 50

Thread: Nightmares (or pipe dreams) About Prosecution for Self-Defense **Merged**

  1. #46
    VIP Member Array Kerbouchard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,894
    Ragin,
    I tend to agree with most of what you said...
    The only thing I disagree is that it is selfish to not do anything. There are a million different factors that play in, and there is no way to know for sure how anybody would react to a specific situation. The woman getting stabbed, for instance. You don't know what would be in betweeen you and the BG/victim, you don't know what might be behind them. You could be feeling under the weather and be unsure of your shot or response time slow down. God forbid, you might even freeze up at the horror of what is unfolding in front of you. (By 'You' in the previous sentences I mean me, you, everybody...)
    Some people would think nothing of jumping into a burning building to save a life, while that same person might hesitate at jumping in a river to save a drowning kid. Everybody's situations and experience are different. There really is no way to say how I would react to any preconcieved idea. I know what I've done in the past and I can speculate on what I would do in the future, but if for some reason I was unable to protect a victim from a BG, I would hope you wouldn't call me selfish.
    I would do everything I could to help, if:
    I had a reasonable assurance I would succeed
    I had little or no chance of causing collateral damage
    I felt reasonably certain of the parties involved
    And even if the above 3 were met, using lethal force would still be my last option. Now, those are true for protecting a 3rd party. To protect myself, my list is a lot easier...Do I have a good shot? So, maybe that does make me selfish.
    There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil.

    http://miscmusings.townhall.com/

    Who is John Galt?

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #47
    VIP Member Array tns0038's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,129
    Florida is a Castle Doctrine state, and some of those laws include our auto, but it does not include a street corner downtown, or shopping center, and the “good Samaritans act” while it may protect you in your efforts to render first aid, it wont’ protect you in a shooting.

    That said, I’ve helped out people before, and thank God I never had to use lethal force, but anytime you step in to help, you’re placing yourself, and your financial well being in jeopardy.

    One of my best friends (a retired Fed) is going to join the FOP, just so he can purchase there liability insurance. I’m going with him to find out that since I did not retire am I eligible to join, so I can purchase the same insurance.

  4. #48
    New Member Array Sleepless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    5

    Question Harold Fish and his defense website with a lot of interesting reading.

    Quote Originally Posted by BerneyG View Post
    Again, the Harold Fish shooting was in Arizona...Not Texas, and based on the article, the medical examiner, and the people who knew the victim I am not sure it was a good shoot, I don't believe I would have shot in that situation. But you never know. I wasn't there.
    I am completely willing to stipulate that other states have allowed their representatives to skew their laws and move to a guilty until proven innocent stance.
    This seems very interesting and describes some information which might not have been in the newspapers and which makes me wonder about the legal system there but I will let you all decide for yourself.

    To make it short, Harold Fish's lawyers has filed a motion for a new trial and states that the DA's office, due to severe prosecutorial misconduct in the case prevented Harold Fish from receiving a fair trial, they have the motion posted on the front page of the website and it seems to be very interesting reading.

    Read it and let me know what you all think.

    Website address is: Harold Fish Defense

  5. #49
    VIP Member Array Kerbouchard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,894
    sleepless, interesting site, I hope Fish gets his new trial and hopefully the truth will come out. It does seem to be difficult to present a 'self-defense' defense when there are no witnesses. An over-zelous prosecutor can pretty much make up the facts as they go. The only person to contradict them is the accused. Definitely not a good situation to be in.
    There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil.

    http://miscmusings.townhall.com/

    Who is John Galt?

  6. #50
    GPS
    GPS is offline
    Member Array GPS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by Ragin Cajun View Post

    I'm a firm believer that one day we will all have to answer for our actions here on earth. This world is becoming more and more everyday a "It's all about me" place. That is why it going to crap so quickly. Sure, there are a lot of bad people out there but if the good people would band together and help each other out more, the good would definitly out weigh the bad.
    Okay, flame away!
    Cajun,
    The big thing we need to remember is that most people out there are and are in no way prepared to intervene. When they do, they just end up being the next victim. In the instances that a person with a CCW is at the scene, they are faced with trying to tell the good guy from the bad guy and/or trying to control/hold both parties until the LEOs arrive or risk blowing the wrong party away. Then, when the calvary finally arrives, you are the one they find standing there with a gun in your hand. It gets to be too much bad juju for most folks to risk. Then you have to deal with officers, the DA and the local media second guessing everything that went on. It's no wonder most think twice before offering assistance.
    Cordially,
    GPS

    Visit U.S. Concealed Carry - The Ultimate Resource for the Armed Citizen http://www.usconcealedcarry.com/inde...ffID=GStrecker

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. New TV Show: The Best Defense (Merged X 2)
    By Rob Pincus in forum Defensive Books, Video & References
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: December 30th, 2009, 10:21 PM
  2. prosecution for legal modifications?
    By Thanis in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 103
    Last Post: December 11th, 2009, 02:00 PM
  3. Courtroom Tactics-Defending the Self-Defense Case (Merged)
    By BikerRN in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 5th, 2009, 07:55 PM
  4. 12 ga. Home Defense-Buckshot Only? (Dupe threads merged)
    By Bart in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: July 27th, 2009, 09:37 AM

Search tags for this page

lawton burglary

,

prosecutions for self defense

,

what happened to jimmy hecksel

Click on a term to search for related topics.