Risk in using "assault weapons" for home defense? - Page 3

Risk in using "assault weapons" for home defense?

This is a discussion on Risk in using "assault weapons" for home defense? within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; If it was a good shoot there's no problem, but unless you are staying in a room long guns are not the best choice if ...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Risk in using "assault weapons" for home defense?

  1. #31
    Member Array gotammo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    If it was a good shoot there's no problem, but unless you are staying in a room long guns are not the best choice if you need to move around the house.

  2. #32
    Member Array Dihappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Quote Originally Posted by Anubis View Post
    I have seen studies (caveat: on the Internet where anything can be faked) including photos which showed that a FMJ 5.56mm rifle bullet disintegrated when hitting a piece of drywall. The conclusion was that FMJ pistol bullets are a bigger over-penetration threat.

    Google 5.56 + overpenetration to find 3000 hits.

    Big misconception.
    "...trying to get a long gun into play while someone is all over you like a monkey eating a cupcake is not very conducive to good survival techniques." ~Bark'n

  3. #33
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Fayetteville, AR
    Risk in using "assault weapons" for home defense?
    Just like to point out the contradiction in terms. Anything used for self defense is not an "assault weapon". Who's definition, and who's weapons?
    My question is essentially the thread title. Does anyone have any experience or anecdotal evidence to indicate that a homeowner would be at greater legal risk by planning in-home defense around an AR carbine, "assault shotgun," or other non-handgun optimized for fighting?

    Assuming an otherwise "good shoot," is the defender more likely to have legal defense problems just because he used his carbine rather than his 1911?
    Planning your home defense revolves around you....and your tool of choice. Most times we are talking a one man scenario, and whatever tools you have at your disposal are right for the cause. Everyone that takes up the cause should know their limitations as well as the limitations of the tool used. If you are worried about legal risks, then in reality, you're compromising your position. To me, compromise and assumption mean the same. Never assume anything or you'll make an ...out of . and ..

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #34
    Member Array Rob Pincus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Lawyers can (and will) use buzzwords to whatever effect they can. Once you've decided to prepare yourself for defense with a firearm, I wouldn't worry too much about that.

    On the penetration issue, I have done the demo several times in class, on DVDs and TV segments.... 5.56 does generally penetrate fewer drywall sections than typical modern pistol hollow points. TAP (or the civ equivalent) 5.56 or even standard 55gr HP is a "safer" round to be downrange from in a typical home than 9mm, .40 or .45 jacketed HPs. The heavier rounds maintain their forward momentum through the drywall much better, they also fragment less, which helps them stay heavier.


  6. #35
    Member Array mykeld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Quote Originally Posted by archer51 View Post
    I wouldn't worry about an AR or AK causing a problem legally if you had to use it. What I would be worried about with either of them is over penetration causing injury to an innocent party.

    more later...

  7. #36
    VIP Member Array OPFOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    As numerous posters have pointed out already, the risk of dangerous overpenetration is just as great or greater with many pistol calibers than it is with many 5.56/.223 loads.
    A man fires a rifle for many years, and he goes to war. And afterward he turns the rifle in at the armory, and he believes he's finished with the rifle. But no matter what else he might do with his hands - love a woman, build a house, change his son's diaper - his hands remember the rifle.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. MD Senate Bill 516: "Maryland Assault Weapons Ban of 2010"
    By Janq in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 5th, 2010, 01:28 PM
  2. "Submachine gun" style weapons for home defense
    By Katana in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: April 9th, 2009, 06:33 PM
  3. CBS News Assault Weapons "Report"
    By Captain Crunch in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: October 3rd, 2007, 09:26 AM
  4. Ken Jenne, enemy of "assault weapons," likely faces felony charges
    By peacefuljeffrey in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: September 4th, 2007, 11:32 AM
  5. Cincy "assault weapons" seizures
    By buckeye .45 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: December 23rd, 2006, 09:55 PM

Search tags for this page

assault rifle danger factors


assault rifle risks


assault weapons and home defense


assault weapons in home defense


gary mcfadden. maryland gun


home defense assault weapon


submachine gun for home defense


weapon risks in homes

Click on a term to search for related topics.