Florida: Protecting Neighbors Property
This is a discussion on Florida: Protecting Neighbors Property within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Florida law is a bit vague when it comes to protecting a neighbors property. The respective section of the law states:
776.031 Use of force ...
-
January 12th, 2009 09:37 AM
#1
Senior Member
Array
Florida: Protecting Neighbors Property
Florida law is a bit vague when it comes to protecting a neighbors property. The respective section of the law states:
776.031 Use of force in defense of others.--A person is justified in the use of force,
except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on, or other tortious or criminal interference with, either real property other than a dwelling or personal property, lawfully in his or her possession or in the possession of another who is a member of his or her immediate family or household or of a person
whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect.
However, the person is justified in the use of deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person does not have a duty to retreat if the person is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
I did try to highlight the important parts. My interpretation of it:
- I am not allowed to shoot for simple "trespass".
- "Burglary" is a forcible felony.
But what about the part where it says: "whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect" ? I am typically not legally obligated to watch my neighbors property. Gutmacher writes in his Florida Firearms law book: "Unless you're a security guard hired to protect the property, or an employee on the premises, I think you better just call the police. There may be an exception where a nieghbor or friend has actually agreed to protect his neighbor's property - but I haven't found any case law on this".
in short: What do people think. If it is a burglary, then the first part of the statute does not apply, and deadly force is legal even if you do not have a legal obligation to protect the neighbors property.
OR
would it be better to formally (in writing) agree on on protecting each others property?
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. (Thomas Jefferson)
-
January 12th, 2009 09:37 AM
Remove Ads
-
January 12th, 2009 10:52 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
Do you have Jon Gutmacher's book?
He discusses the use of deadly force in detail and specifically with respect to the defense of property. It's pretty involved so I won't even try to recap it here, but the bottom line is that in a situation like you describe, reasonableness in choosing to apply deadly force is going to come into play. It's one thing to use deadly force to stop an active rape......quite another to do so to stop someone from walking out your neighbor's back door with a toaster under their arm.
Personally, if I see someone burglarizing my neighbors house, I'm calling 911 and taking note of anything possible to enable the police to do their job in catching the thieves......
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in a grey twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
Theodore Roosevelt
-
January 12th, 2009 11:06 AM
#3
VIP Member
Array
In the case of a burglary of a neighbors house, I would not use deadly force to stop it. That is what the phone and 911 are for. Make the call and be a good witness.
would it be better to formally (in writing) agree on on protecting each others property?
I would NEVER under any circumstances put anything in writing or make a verbal agreement, about protecting another person, or their property. IMO to do so is asking for trouble. A lawyer will paint you as a LEO wannabe at best, and a vigilante looking for an excuse to shoot someone in the worst case.
Last edited by archer51; January 12th, 2009 at 11:08 AM.
Reason: added thought
-
January 12th, 2009 12:22 PM
#4
Distinguished Member
Array
PaulJ, Archer51 has given good advice. I strongly suggest that, if the situation should ever arise, you abide by that advice.
"It does not do to leave a dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him."
J. R. R. Tolkien
-
January 12th, 2009 01:47 PM
#5
Member
Array
Insurance policies protect personal property; firearms protect innocent lives.
-
January 12th, 2009 02:15 PM
#6
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
SleazyRider
Insurance policies protect personal property; firearms protect innocent lives.
Bingo! ^^
And plus one to David, Archer, and Ron.
Taking life, putting your own life, and the hard earned acquired and saved wealth of your family all on the line to save your neighbors lawn mower, Hupmobile, or Best Buy bought flat screen TV?!
I mean think about that for a minute.
All items that are insured, or should be!, and if they aren't then they are considered to be of little to no value by the neighbor anyway (!) and they can be easily replaced via a trip to Best Buy, Radio Shack, Sears, or the by All State and Nationwide.
Seriously think about this. How much sense does it make to risk your freedoms, all of your monies and further monies you don't have toward mounting a defense case alone on the criminal justice side alone and having to spend your kids college fund and your wife 401K or IRA....all because you wanted to stop some dirt bag from stealing the neighbors Huffy.
Sleazy Rider said it really well.
Don't get me wrong I'm not for thieves and thievery nor do I appreciate as much.
But lets be realistic. This is life and living in modern day America, rather than a dime store novel speaking to 'justice' at a time and generation long ago gone from actuality.
Notable exception though to all of the above are those few persons who live in Texas, where as based on results just about anybody can seemingly shoot at anyone for any dang reason, and pretty much not have to sweat legal repercussions be it by the po-po and/or a not likely to convict jury of their peers.
- Judge Joe Horn, 'Neighbor'
"Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " -
Robert A. Levy
"A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." -
Florida Div. of Licensing
-
January 12th, 2009 02:27 PM
#7
Distinguished Member
Array
As you probably know by now, I am adamantly against hard rules for dynamic situation; it can get you in trouble, or worse...
This being said I agree that, in most cases, you should let the police handle it; however each situation is a judgment call, depending on many parameters.
The more knowledgeable you are the better will that call be.
If it is a situation you might get into, check with a lawyer; telling the Judge "well I saw that on Internet" is not going to help
The first rule of a gunfight: "Don't be there !"
The second rule: "Bring enough gun"
jfl (NRA Life Member/Instructor - GOA - IDPA - GSSF - ex-IHMSA)
-
January 12th, 2009 02:40 PM
#8
VIP Member
Array
My neighbors are also some of my closest friends.
Beside getting together all the time, we keep an eye on each other’s house, and toys parked in the yard.
A few months ago, I noticed a strange pickup truck parked at my neighbor’s house. I knew he was out of town, the rest of the month so I walked over to his house to investigate.
When I got there I found a friend of his out back cleaning and taking care of the pool.
Not a big deal, but I’m glad I walked over instead of calling the COPs.
So, the way I see it is, I’m going to look after my neighbors house, like I would look after mine.
I have not nor would I shoot someone for simple theft.
However, if they attack me, or threaten me, then that’s a different story.
-
January 12th, 2009 03:07 PM
#9
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
tns0038
.
So, the way I see it is, I’m going to look after my neighbors house, like I would look after mine.
I have not nor would I shoot someone for simple theft.
However, if they attack me, or threaten me, then that’s a different story.

No argument whatsoever with that. I do the same with my neighbors.
"It does not do to leave a dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him."
J. R. R. Tolkien
-
January 12th, 2009 03:23 PM
#10
Senior Member
Array
I think the answers clarified my initial question :-). (and good to bounce stuff like this off the group).
Shooting just for "breaking and entering" would be bad and not appropriate, not even for my own home. Lets say I come home, and see someone working on the door, a call to 911 would probably be more appropriate assuming the house is empty. If I know someone is in the house and probably sleeping, then things get more complex. In the case of a neighbor, I may not know for sure who is in the house.
I do have Gutmacher's book, and will read the respective sections again. But in part he admits that this section of the law is not perfectly clear and not yet proven in court.
as tns0038 said, my neighbors are some of my best friends, and we routinely call each other if we see odd cars parked or things like that. I do feel responsible to protect them.
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. (Thomas Jefferson)
-
January 12th, 2009 05:33 PM
#11
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
PaulJ
I think the answers clarified my initial question :-). (and good to bounce stuff like this off the group).
I do have Gutmacher's book, and will read the respective sections again. But in part he admits that this section of the law is not perfectly clear and not yet proven in court.
Here is the problem: Since the law in this area has not yet been established, you do not, repeat, do not, want to be the case where the law is established, to your everlasting regret. Jail time, and possible financial ruin.
Trust me on this PaulJ, I know from whence I speak.
"It does not do to leave a dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him."
J. R. R. Tolkien
-
January 12th, 2009 05:53 PM
#12
Ex Member
Array
My advice would be to NOT try to defend property with deadly force in this state. Unless you believe they are an IMMEDIATE and lethal threat to you... just call 911 and try to be a good witness, take pictures/video if possible.
Also, keep in mind that generally, the castle doctrine means inside your home - not in your yard, your neighbor's yard, etc. Those areas fall under regular self-defense laws...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By DaveH in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Replies: 7
Last Post: May 5th, 2009, 09:49 AM
-
By GLOCK23FAN in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Replies: 23
Last Post: May 2nd, 2009, 04:01 AM
-
By deadeye72 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 16
Last Post: May 7th, 2008, 08:47 PM
-
By NKMG19 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Replies: 15
Last Post: April 15th, 2008, 11:52 AM
-
By jednp in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 48
Last Post: February 8th, 2007, 12:09 AM
Search tags for this page
deadly use of force to protect property in florida
, fl laws about protecting property
, fl laws on neighbors
, fl terminate court criminal interference
, floorida procting your or your neighbors property
, florida 776.031
, florida law - neighbor parked on my yard
, florida law deadly force protect property
, florida laws protecting property against neighbor
, florida protecting neighbors house
, law regarding protecting neighbors propert
, protecting neighbors
, protecting neighbors property
, what is law about protecting neighbors property
, what is the rule of law on defending a neighbor's property