Real situation tonight - Weapons cleared holsters!!
This is a discussion on Real situation tonight - Weapons cleared holsters!! within the Carry & Defensive Scenarios forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by elkhunter
Okay, from the comfort of my computer chair with coffee in hand, I have a different perspective.
As I read your ...
March 21st, 2009 11:40 AM
+1 Exact same thing I was thinking.
Originally Posted by elkhunter
"Run for your life from the man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another-their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun."
Who is John Galt?
March 21st, 2009 11:43 AM
Well I am glad it worked out for you guys but I think you should have called 911 and let them handle it. Follow him with 911 on the line if you want to go the extra mile. Here is a senario for you: Lets say the guy was a off duty or CC guy and he was trying to get his drunk/drugged out kid back home. You guys show up armed, he fears for HIS life a gun fight takes place.......You see this is heading no where good. My .02
“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.”.... Albert Einstein
March 21st, 2009 11:56 AM
Elkhunter hit the nail on the head
Yup, you guys are lucky it wasn't all a trick. You could have been caught in a deadly crossfire while the guns were stolen.
Originally Posted by elkhunter
G-d invented 911 for a reason.
Even if the lady had been screaming her head off for help, you'd be in an impossible position. It could still have been a trick.
March 21st, 2009 12:16 PM
From these statements, I can't tell if you are truly worried about the guy coming back or if you are hoping to get another crack at him.
That worries me a bit as he might come back with an attitude one day. I might have a second chance with him!
I had no idea Robert Fitzgerald was God. I wish I would have known that before he died. I had some issues he could have resolved.
G-d invented 911 for a reason.
Of course the Brits had 999 since the 30s, the New Zealanders had 111 since the late 50s, and Australians had 000 since the early 60s. 911 didn't come into play until the late 60s. http://www.911dispatch.com/911/history/index.html
Considering yourself to be defenseless is the first administrative step to becoming a victim.
March 21st, 2009 12:59 PM
Originally Posted by bandit383
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" - Thomas Jefferson
"The patriot volunteer, fighting for country and his rights, makes the most reliable soldier on earth." - Stonewall Jackson
March 21st, 2009 01:14 PM
don't take everything literally
Originally Posted by Double Naught Spy
1) don't take everything literally
2) if you truly believe that there is a deity guiding men's actions, the above statement I made isn't absurd.
3) don't take everything literally
March 21st, 2009 04:02 PM
Well, I'm not well-seasoned or anything, but as a recent sheep, I'll say this: Reading your account, I can see where your heart was in the right place, trying to save a potential kidnapping victim. And at least nobody got hurt. As for your actions, I don't know that it was the best way to go about it, things may have ended differently...and your safety is paramount to anything else. I was always told not to draw unless you plan to shoot, not to shoot unless you plan on emptying your weapon, and unless you plan on destroying whatever it is you're aiming at. It worries me because it could have only taken a milisecond for things to go from "tense" to "lethal" and "jail time." But I'm a really bad armchair quarterback, so YMMV.
March 21st, 2009 04:30 PM
I can't help but notice some of the scathing comments here, but some seem to have missed that whole beginning part about the choke hold. Being put in that situation myself, I probably would have done much the same thing, sans the orders to get out of the vehicle. My first concern would have been the potential victim, their status, and getting them away safely after 911 was already called. The aggressor can go about his business as far as I'm concerned as long as it doesn't involved continued physical harm to the victim.
To those who always insist on doing nothing...better be damn sure it's not my wife, sister, mother, etc... that you let some scum of the earth have their way with, because I don't want to go to prison for ripping your arms out of their sockets and feeding them to you for standing by and doing nothing!
Please take a moment to help a Veteran and one of our own: gofundme.com/5d9dfa2s
March 21st, 2009 05:47 PM
I don't believe in doing nothing either.
Originally Posted by packinnova
I would probably have called 911 to report it, then "challenge" the guy to leave the woman alone but with my gun holstered and concealed. As soon as I saw evidence that it was a domestic problem, I would disengage immediately.
I know getting involved can be risky but I was raised to believe that good people help people.
I hear too much about the legal problems of getting involved.
My plan will always be to assess the situation and go from there. I don't plan on going in like Captain America but I can't stand by and watch a woman getting busted up by some guy.
So, you can leave my arms where they are.
fortiter in re, suaviter in modo (resolutely in action, gently in manner).
March 21st, 2009 05:53 PM
I once beat a guy senseless for hitting a woman. He went to the Hospital with blood pouring out of his ears. Only by a miracle did I not go to jail ,the woman actually changed the story and accused me of attacking him....even with all of that ,I'd gladly do it again. Like Paul G said above.
Good people help people.
When you do the right thing you have to believe that it'll work out for you.
Anyone who would watch and do nothing is less than human in my eyes. You may be "right" ,but it's at a cost of something that I wouldn't want to lose in myself.
March 21st, 2009 06:52 PM
I didn't miss it...the scathing comments were directed toward the manner in which it was handled and the tone of how it was related.
Originally Posted by packinnova
Helping somebody out is one thing...going on patrol, acting like an officer, giving unlawful orders and then drawing a weapon when they are not complied with is completely different.
Perhaps the comment about 'maybe he'll have another chance at this guy' or the fact that they commanded the guy away from his vehicle through me off, but I still think the OP and his partner should have ended up in jail.
As always, YMMV.
March 21st, 2009 07:06 PM
Here is my .02, I think you did the right thing. I would have stepped up also. The problem is to many people talk about steping up but don't. Yes It could have been a trick to get you away from the van. Yes it could have been a trick to case the store. But next time if you are standing next to a vehicle loaded with long guns, I think you you should have remained covered and taken out of of the long guns to help with the situtation. Any thought about having 1 loaded long gun while loading up the unloaded ones. CCW is great but nothing beats a long gun.
March 21st, 2009 07:10 PM
So, you think it is a good thing you 'beat a guy senseless with blood pouring out of his ears?' And you are proud of that overreaction? It is a miracle you did not go to jail and that has nothing to do with anyone changing a story. From your telling of the event you did attack him. Chivalry is one thing. Assault is a felony.
Originally Posted by PNUT
I agree with the many that have opined the OP was very much out of line. We are not LE. We cannot command citizens to do our bidding at gunpoint. In Arizona, that action would rightly be considered aggravated assault, irrespective of whether the gun was pointed a the citizen.
This is exactly the type of behavior that is used as evidence by the antis to demonstrate their point. We ridicule the antis, but this action should not be condoned by responsible gun owners.
March 21st, 2009 07:52 PM
I can't 2nd guess what the OP did. I hope that if my wife was in the same situation and I wasn't around, that someone would do the same thing.
Tactically, I think you also did the correct thing: You separated yourselves from each other yet still kept safe lines of fire [towards the subject(s).
The fact that you were not arrested says you did the right thing.
Did the police ask the large man what he was doing in the vicinity [of the gun shop]? Maybe they were the ones who pulled the original break-in.
Just be careful, battered women very frequently will turn on their rescuers.
An armed populace are called citizens.
An unarmed populace are called subjects.
March 21st, 2009 08:13 PM
Yes, I'm not ashamed of it, in fact he tried to hit me first. Maybe I should have posted that. I didn't beat him out of anger or revenge,I hit him once,he started to get up and I thought that he was going to get a weapon,pretty sure he was ,so I kicked him in the face. Once he was no longer a danger I stopped.
Originally Posted by SelfDefense
I don't think that the OP was right to draw a weapon but he did do the right thing by getting involved. We all have loved ones and I wouldn't let someone hurt yours, I would want the same from my fellow citizens if it was my wife,kid or other loved one in a situation.
By Jackle1886 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: December 24th, 2009, 01:30 AM
By Tally XD in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: March 31st, 2009, 07:38 PM
By jfl in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: January 13th, 2009, 04:24 PM
By rangerman2003 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: October 1st, 2008, 02:17 PM
By VtCO in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: May 21st, 2008, 02:55 PM
Search tags for this page
weapons in holsters
Click on a term to search for related topics.