No More Safety For Me

No More Safety For Me

This is a discussion on No More Safety For Me within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; So I was doing some draw and dry fire practice today with my EDC (PT145) and got to thinking. Maybe I just havent pratcied with ...

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: No More Safety For Me

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009

    No More Safety For Me

    So I was doing some draw and dry fire practice today with my EDC (PT145) and got to thinking. Maybe I just havent pratcied with it enough but it seems like having to swipe the manual saftey off adds quite a bit of time to my draw/site/fire motion. Now by quite a bit of time we are talking maybe a quarter to 1/2 of a second but in a deadly force scenario that half a second could mean a lot. Since my trigger has a decent amount of take up on it and the gun has a firing pin block I think I am going to try carrying it with the manual saftey off for a while and see if I cant get used to it.
    -It is a seriously scary thought that there are subsets of American society that think being intellectual is a BAD thing...

  2. #2
    Distinguished Member Array GWRedDragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Arlington, VA
    1/2 second seems like a lot. You should be sweeping it off as you raise the gun, which IMO shouldn't add much of a delay at all.

    Now, I personally prefer no safety because I don't want to forget to turn it off, or go through the motion but not actually get it off and then freeze up when the gun won't fire, but I don't think it's a speed issue.
    "Trust in God with hand on sword" -Inscription on my family's coat of arms from medieval England
    ---Carry options: G26/MTAC, PF9/MiniTuck, PPK/Pocket, USP40/OWB---
    ---NOTE: I am not an expert. If I ever start acting like a know-it-all, please call me on it immediately. ---

  3. #3
    Member Array Laser Sailor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Right Here
    I agree.

    As a military police officer I wanted to eliminate any fine motor movements from my draw in the case of an emergency. I started doing this after one day at the range, during a practical weapons qual I forgot to slip the safety and was late in getting my shots off. The instructor told me if I did that in the real world it "would make me a dead man." So I began to flick the safety off when I went out on patrol, and flick it back on before going somewhere like the NEX or back to HQ.

    Now, on my personal Beretta (Px4 9mm) the safety is a smaller switch, when shooting from the holster or dry firing my thumb merely grazes over the safety about 1/4 of the time. So I've done away with it and now carry condition one, hammer down safety OFF. This is only when the weapon is on my belt under my direct control, when it goes on the headboard for the night or in the safe 9for whatever reason) the safety goes back on.
    Last edited by JD; March 14th, 2010 at 07:58 PM. Reason: addressed via PM
    MA2, USN

    When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state". Love your country, but never trust its government.
    -- Robert A. Heinlein.

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #4
    Senior Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Central Florida
    If your firearm has a manual/external safety, use it. Develop the muscle memory through a lot of practice, and you won't have to even think about it when you draw your firearm.
    Proverbs 27:12 says: “The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and suffer for it.”

    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member

  6. #5
    VIP Member Array BugDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Under an old Volkswagen somewhere in Florida
    With a good holster, it shouldn't matter carrying with the safety off. Pocket carry, even in a holster, I would probably leave it on.
    Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
    No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.

  7. #6
    Ex Member Array maddyfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    It depends on the weapon. Some of these SA autos, I would highly suggest you guys carry with the safety 'on'

  8. #7
    VIP Member
    Array Thumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Dayton, Nevada
    Clicking off the safety shouldn't take any time off your shot at all! When you draw your weapon, as soon as your muzzle is down range and just as you're pressing in to your target "click", off comes the safety, your arms reach full extension (depending on stance), you're acquiring your sight picture as you move your trigger finger to the trigger and "press" the trigger... bang! All in one fluid motion.

    No lost time at all!
    ALWAYS carry! - NEVER tell!

    "A superior Operator is best defined as someone who uses his superior
    judgement to keep himself out of situations that would require a display of his
    superior skills."

  9. #8
    Distinguished Member Array Agave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Nederland & W. Tennessee
    Rollo, I think you are making a wise choice.
    The preceding post may contain sarcasm; it's just better that way. However, it is still intended with construction and with the Love of my L-rd Y'shua.

    NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, World Drifter

  10. #9
    Distinguished Member Array skysoldier29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Miami Florida / Michigan
    They put the safety on it for a reason, I would suggest using it and practice a lot with it. I don't like any pistol with any sort of manual safety on it due to that fact. I am a violator of my own rules about safeties on guns in Afghanistan right now. I don't use the safety at all on my M9 because my hands are kinda small and I can't sweep it off with one hand. I just use the half cock on it to keep the pressure off the firing pin incase i drop it.

  11. #10
    VIP Member Array zacii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    My EDC rotation is between a 1911 and an XD. The difference in holster presentation speed doesn't exist. If the pistol has a safety switch, I would use it. Turning off the safety should be part of the presentation, like retsupt said, it shouldn't be an issue.
    Trust in God and keep your powder dry

    "A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -source

  12. #11
    Senior Member Array Armydad's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    North Carolina


    That is one reason that I like the Springfield XD series. It has built in safeties, but as soon as you properly grip the gun you are ready to go. No need to remember disengaging a manual safety. On the other hand, it is all in what you practice. Muscle memory is the key. I know that I do not practice enough and I carry an LCP or a 357 revolver most of the time. I haven't worked out the clothing thing yet.

  13. #12
    Senior Member Array Divebum47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    I'd be very careful if I were you. The PT145 is an SA/DA gun, and no de-cocker.
    "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array varob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Maybe its just years of carrying a 1911, but I always feel for a thumb safety. Even on my Glock 27.

    I've always thought that the benefits of having the safety on out weighted the risk of the fraction of a second that I may benefit from with it off.
    Don't believe what you hear and only half of what you see!
    -Tony Soprano

  15. #14
    Ex Member Array Treo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    If you want to carry a weapon W/out a safety get a weapon designed to be carried as such. Walking aroung W/ a SA weapon in condition zero is an ND waiting for a place to happen.

    That said, I take no issue W/ carrying a DA/ SA in DA mode W/out the safety

  16. #15
    VIP Member
    Array WHEC724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by varob View Post
    Maybe its just years of carrying a 1911, but I always feel for a thumb safety. Even on my Glock 27.

    I've always thought that the benefits of having the safety on out weighted the risk of the fraction of a second that I may benefit from with it off.
    That's funny. I habitually thumb-sweep my Glocks too. They don't seem to mind...
    __________________________________________________ ____
    You Can Also Find Me On Personal Defense Forum Dot Com

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. M&P9c safety or not?
    By monte in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: November 8th, 2014, 07:33 PM
  2. Range Safety, Combat Safety
    By CR Williams in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 13th, 2011, 10:03 PM
  3. Montana - Public Safety v. Private Safety
    By DOGOFWAR01 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 15th, 2009, 04:34 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 25th, 2008, 11:11 AM
  5. S&W 1911 grip safety/FP safety problems?
    By sheepdog in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: December 8th, 2007, 12:24 PM

Search tags for this page

1911 concealed carry


charles cutshaw


glock selector switch


pt145 review

Click on a term to search for related topics.