Question: Should someone have free reign to decide who does or does not have a CCP without objective criteria?
That is the real issue once the rest of the crap is removed.
I'm also going to try and go on with the rest of my life, constantly struggling to learn from my foolish and reckless thoughts that this guy is a complete and total TOOL; an unmitigated embarrassment to the entire gun owning public, and an irresponsible and dangerous attention seeking clown. I'll try, I'll try and go on Super Trucker, but it's just so darn hard... Sniff, sniff…snortel.
I'm thinking Jim Zumbo or Dan Cooper would feel right at home in this crowd
Frankly, I think his 2A rights should be revoked for being an idiot. But thats just me.
And by the way, I believe that he painted the tip of the AK-47-type pistol orange just to decorate it as much as I believe in Santa Claus.
I think that the guy is lucky to still be alive. What do you think that many CCWers had done if that guy came walking against them in the dark while holding a big revolver in his hand? I do not think that he even considered that possibility.
I don't think I have ever heard that one has to carry a weapon unholstered in your hand out on the street....I don't think all his dogs were barking.
2) Stupid isn't necessarily illegal and illegal isn't necessarily stupid.
3) The US Supreme Court determined that burning the flag in an act of defiance is no longer illegal under the 1st amendment as free speech.
4) The same people that decided #3 above was OK, once given enough wiggle room, can also decide to take your 2nd amendment right for whatever reason they want. It starts with a bunch of people agreeing to take one person's right for some subjective reason that they all agree upon. Then the group wanting to take rights continues to shrink while the net it casts grows larger and the subjective reasons become more narrowly defined by that small group. It's all fun and games until someone wants to take your right for some reason that they feel is right and you don't.