Anonymous self defense?

This is a discussion on Anonymous self defense? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; In reading about reports of self defense cases in the news, sometimes the people's names are revealed and sometimes they aren't. I'm wondering if there ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Anonymous self defense?

  1. #1
    Member Array sentioch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    394

    Anonymous self defense?

    In reading about reports of self defense cases in the news, sometimes the people's names are revealed and sometimes they aren't.

    I'm wondering if there is any kind of right to remain anonymous when legally defending oneself...what determines if your name gets released to the media?

    Personally if I had to defend myself, and then it went into the media, I would not want to have to explain to all my extended family and friends...it's not really their business.
    "In a world of compromise, some don't." -HK

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array ctsketch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,319
    Names of victims are usually not revealed in most cases unless it is important to the investigation for the identity of the parties to be publicly known or if consent is given. But those rules are for the police...media has no scruples...
    Glock 19
    Kahr PM9
    LMT-M4
    Mossberg 590
    Shodan, Jujutsu

  4. #3
    Member
    Array rigel42's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    474
    Seems like every article I’ve read regarding a self-defense shooting, the name of the victim is published. Even if the right does exist, I doubt the media would honor it [insert MSM rant].

  5. #4
    Member Array DKPRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    35
    I used to work as a journalist (Small town not MSM), and routinely read police reports and did the crime beat. Sometimes the police will black out names, but even if they do, they usually can't/don't black out addresses.

    While I imagine most news organizations have their own internal guidelines, the general policy of our station was to not reveal a victims name unless the name itself was germane to the story. (And never ever for juveniles or sexual assault victims.)

    In other words, We didn't reveal it, unless its only news worthy BECAUSE of the who the victim is. (like if the city councilman gets beat up casting a controversial vote or something like that, you pretty much have to identify the victim because that's the whole story.)

    When it comes to a self-defense shooting, what you are probably seeing is the bias of the media, in that they are not considering the self-defense shooter a "victim," in the usual sense, because the shooter is himself often being subjected to police inquiry (to determine if its a good shoot, etc,) so instead of being treated as a victim, he's being treated as a subject.

    Not saying that is right, but I suspect that's the basis for it.

  6. #5
    Member Array Skippys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    171
    I've been working as a photographer for a newspaper since 1981. generally speaking, anything that's public record is publishable.

    we routinely do not identify juveniles nor sexual assault victims; otherwise the decision comes down to whether the victim is "newsworthy:" if the mayor, police chief or a well-known busineman/woman was the victim we probably would ID them unless it was a sexual assault.

    usually it boils down to what the cops & the DA tell us. usually victims are not specifically identified at the morning briefing, but we'll still quickly figure it out because it's a matter of public record.

    if the victim is john q. public -- even when we know the name -- we rarely publish the identification on the first of several reports. if the victim shoots and/or kills someone in self defense, that person's name will eventually be published in subsequent reports because there will ALWAYS be an investigation & trial.

    if you pull the trigger, even in self defense, be prepared for life as you know it to change, and publicity is the least of your problems. like it or not, fair or not, by pulling the trigger you have opted to step into the realm of "public figure" and your privacy rights have changed.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Giving without reward: Universities receive millions in anonymous donation
    By matiki in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 17th, 2009, 12:18 PM
  2. Defense of others?
    By Hotpockets in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: October 30th, 2008, 04:08 PM
  3. Does anyone know of a GA (Guns Anonymous)?
    By tattoo13 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: September 27th, 2008, 07:32 PM
  4. Dog defense........
    By zelenkajl in forum Defensive Knives & Other Weapons
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: August 24th, 2008, 01:11 AM
  5. LMS Defense Home Defense - Defensive Medical COMBO / Yuba City, CA / March 8-10, 2008
    By Tony Siciliano in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 6th, 2008, 12:55 PM