NRA possible sell out
This is a discussion on NRA possible sell out within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; recieved this today from the RMGO of Colorado...........and what the heck is going on
Wall Street Journal, Roll Call confirm NRA Sell-Out
Washington is ablaze ...
-
June 17th, 2010 10:26 AM
#1
Member
Array
NRA possible sell out
recieved this today from the RMGO of Colorado...........and what the heck is going on
Wall Street Journal, Roll Call confirm NRA Sell-Out
Washington is ablaze with news about the NRA's abandonment of free speech.
Some of you still may not believe the NRA could strike such a gruesome deal with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi on the DISCLOSE Act, which is sponsored by the Senate's most shrill gun-hater, Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
Those of you still not convinced need to view this morning's Wall Street Journal editorial, which jumped into the fray, decrying the NRA's sell-out and pointing out that their exemption is not only dangerous but abandons their natural allies.
"Cutting a special deal at the expense of the First Amendment with lawmakers who have decided for now to stop gutting the Second Amendment reveals an NRA that is unprincipled and will be weaker for it in the long run" - Wall Street Journal, 6/16/2010
Or you can check out this story from Roll Call:
"The National Rifle Association is publicly pledging to uphold its end of the bargain with House Democratic leadership over a measure to roll back a controversial Supreme Court decision on political spending." - Roll Call, 6/15/2010
The NRA response (which can be read here) is somewhat different than you might get on the phone if you call NRA HQ.
Some members are reporting the NRA is responding with "Who, us??" while others report the response as "We oppose DISCLOSE". But both of these responses are the type you'd expect from politicians, not allies in the fight for freedom (which they aren't).
But to better arm you in this battle, here is a supply of fact-tipped ammo:
Every news source in Washington, and the NRA itself (in the NRA's own words, linked above) agree that an exemption for the NRA itself (which would not apply to any other gun rights group) will remove their opposition to the DISCLOSE Act.
The existence of the exemption, in the form of an amendment to the DISCLOSE Act, is not being debated by anyone, only whether or not this deal with the Democrats serves their members (again, read the alert).
Only a few organizations will be exempted, as is the intention.
If gun owners do not have the right to free speech, our firearms freedoms are going away... quickly.
How, after all, can we defend the Second Amendment if we're not allowed to talk to voters, the general public, or even our own members?
How can politicians be held accountable if organizations cannot discuss their votes? That's the ultimate politician protection device.
Though the NRA can say it's a one-issue group (just as we are), mark my words: if we get rid of either the First or Second Amendment, the other is sure to follow.
What can you do?
Call the NRA again, as soon as possible, and urge them to kill the DISCLOSE Act, not cut a deal to pass it. Call them at 1-800-672-3888 today.
Sincerely,
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
Glock 23
Beretta 92fs
Ruger Mark 3
S&W 642
Looking
-
June 17th, 2010 10:26 AM
Remove Ads
-
June 17th, 2010 02:22 PM
#2
Member
Array
And another reason the NRA doesn't get my money and RMGO does.
Here is a site with some info on the NRA
NRAWOL - A critical view of the NRA's compromises
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God such men lived."
-General George S. Patton
USAF Master Sergeant, Retired
-
June 17th, 2010 02:49 PM
#3
Distinguished Member
Array
The NRA is a single issue organization and that when the ratings and endorsements are announced, they are based solely on a candidate’s support for, or opposition to, our Second Amendment rights. Other issues, as important as they may be to many people, do not and cannot play any role in those decisions.
And that is the way it should be.
Imagine that NRA would have a stand on abortion; there would immediately be a schism between those who support it and those who fight it.
My wife and I have been NRA "lifers" since the mid 80's; we have not always agreed on all what they did and sometimes we understood there positions later.
But I believe that without the NRA, our Second Amendment rights would not be what they are now. More like England, Canada, Australia, France, Spain, the list goes on.
The NRA is dealing with politicians; sometimes you have to adapt your tactics to that of the enemy ...
Do you think they could say "We are supporting Reid so he loses the Dems gun control votes".
The first rule of a gunfight: "Don't be there !"
The second rule: "Bring enough gun"
jfl (NRA Life Member/Instructor - GOA - IDPA - GSSF - ex-IHMSA)
-
June 17th, 2010 02:55 PM
#4
Administrator
Array
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By Ski in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 15
Last Post: January 24th, 2010, 11:42 AM
-
By Frogbones in forum General Firearm Discussion
Replies: 10
Last Post: November 4th, 2009, 09:10 PM
-
By imthduke in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 43
Last Post: September 12th, 2008, 10:24 PM
-
By PhillyGlock23 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 0
Last Post: March 30th, 2008, 11:43 AM
-
By rcsnpr in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 28
Last Post: March 3rd, 2007, 11:55 PM
Search tags for this page
listing of nra compromises and sellouts
, nra selling out ny