Story about armed WA judge makes news
This is a discussion on Story about armed WA judge makes news within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Clark Co. judge’s carry decision makes news, but why?
This week’s revelation by the Vancouver Columbian that a Clark County Superior Court judge has decided ...
2Likes
-
November 19th, 2011 11:18 AM
#1
Member
Array
Story about armed WA judge makes news
Clark Co. judge’s carry decision makes news, but why?

This week’s revelation by the Vancouver Columbian that a Clark County Superior Court judge has decided to carry a defensive firearm nearly everywhere but the courtroom has stirred considerable public interest.
Clark Co. judge
-
November 19th, 2011 11:18 AM
Remove Ads
-
November 19th, 2011 01:13 PM
#2
Member
Array
Smart man, not just depending on a LEO to protect him.

" The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." Thomas Jefferson
-
November 19th, 2011 01:22 PM
#3
VIP Member
Array
I find it annoying that this is considered 'public interest' and wonder how the judge feels about being outed if he's actually on guard for a potential retaliation.
Nicely written tho Dave.
Fortune favors the bold.
Freedom doesn't mean safe, it means free.
The thing about "defense" is that it has practically nothing to do with guns. (As passed on by CCW9MM)
-
November 19th, 2011 02:42 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
9MMare
I find it annoying that this is considered 'public interest' and wonder how the judge feels about being outed if he's actually on guard for a potential retaliation.
Nicely written tho Dave.
The public doesn't always have a right to know!
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. - Robert A. Heinlein
-
November 19th, 2011 02:51 PM
#5
Moderator
Array
The only thing I found questionable about the story is the judge's choice of a minor caliber in light of the threats he's received, but at least he's carrying.
Smitty
NRA Endowment Member
-
November 19th, 2011 03:05 PM
#6
Distinguished Member
Array
That the newspaper would make something of this is curious, almost as though this is very rare. Truth be known, quite a few members of the bench carry firearms, often into the courtroom — depending upon the jurisdiction — and nobody is the wiser.
I really don't see where this is news at all.
I agree with Smitty, if he's going to bother to carry then why limit himself with such a small round? I'm not saying that there's not a time and place for the .380 but if I'm bumping my alert system up a level, then I'm most likely going to carry a service round; at least 9mm & and above.
-
November 19th, 2011 03:26 PM
#7
VIP Member
Array
As a judge, inside the courtroom is one of the places I would definitely want to carry, if legal to do so.
Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.
USAF Retired
NRA Life Member
-
November 19th, 2011 03:40 PM
#8
Senior Member
Array
It is hard for me to imagine, given the nature of the profession, any judge not carrying a self defense weapon. Mark me among those who don't see this as a particularly newsworthy, or surprising item.
Never pick a fight with an old man...If he's too old to fight, he'll just kill you - John Steinbeck
.................................................. .................................................. ......................They Live
-
November 19th, 2011 04:02 PM
#9
Senior Member
Array
I can't imagine ANY judge NOT carrying. It would be like unarmed soldiers at the front lines. Way too many enemies to go out without some sort of protection in these times.
I carry to protect myself and my loved ones from the BG's. Not to solve societies problems. That said: if more carried the deterrent would only have a positive overall effect on those problems.
-
November 19th, 2011 04:09 PM
#10
Senior Member
Array
So just because he took a handgun course, we should trust him in a court room, with a loaded gun?
-
November 19th, 2011 04:12 PM
#11
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
ntkb
So just because he took a handgun course, we should trust him in a court room, with a loaded gun?
Yes just as we trust each other
I carry to protect myself and my loved ones from the BG's. Not to solve societies problems. That said: if more carried the deterrent would only have a positive overall effect on those problems.
-
November 19th, 2011 04:16 PM
#12
Senior Member
Array
Sorry, I guess the humor didn’t quite show through
-
November 19th, 2011 04:29 PM
#13
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
ntkb
Sorry, I guess the humor didn’t quite show through
OK got it now. You had me worried tho. LOL
I carry to protect myself and my loved ones from the BG's. Not to solve societies problems. That said: if more carried the deterrent would only have a positive overall effect on those problems.
-
November 19th, 2011 04:36 PM
#14
Member
Array
Well, his choice of calibers is his business. It might be the only handgun he owns at the moment, and it also miht just be that he packs a small pistol to keep it inconspicuous. Now, the .380 ACP has ruined more than one day for bad guys, especially if the shooter knows how to use it.
Now, as for this being a news story, I'm a little mixed about that, but it appears the judge was willing to talk. Letting the world know you're packing is a proven deterrent to violence. I'd never second-guess the judge for this, because the knowledge, or at least the suspicion, among bad guys has spared others from unpleasantness.
-
November 19th, 2011 04:38 PM
#15
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
DaveWorkman
Well, his choice of calibers is his business. It might be the only handgun he owns at the moment, and it also miht just be that he packs a small pistol to keep it inconspicuous. Now, the .380 ACP has ruined more than one day for bad guys, especially if the shooter knows how to use it.
Now, as for this being a news story, I'm a little mixed about that, but it appears the judge was willing to talk. Letting the world know you're packing is a proven deterrent to violence. I'd never second-guess the judge for this, because the knowledge, or at least the suspicion, among bad guys has spared others from unpleasantness.
Letting others know was a BIG mistake IMHO
I carry to protect myself and my loved ones from the BG's. Not to solve societies problems. That said: if more carried the deterrent would only have a positive overall effect on those problems.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules