Andrew Jackson: Brilliant guy
This is a discussion on Andrew Jackson: Brilliant guy within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; To take from the people the right of bearing arms and put their weapons of defense in the hands of a standing army would be ...
Post By CAS_Shooter
Post By Hiram25
Post By Rock and Glock
January 24th, 2012 09:19 PM
Andrew Jackson: Brilliant guy
In other words, it makes no more sense to take from the people the right to bear arms than it does for the government to accumulate monies beyond what is necessary to support its legitimate obligations. To him, either action would lead a government, tempted with ambition, to endanger the liberties of the people. Note his clear distinction between a standing army vs the right of the people to bear arms.
To take from the people the right of bearing arms and put their weapons of defense in the hands of a standing army would be scarcely more dangerous to their liberties than to permit the Government to accumulate immense amounts of treasure beyond the supplies necessary to its legitimate wants. Such a treasure would doubtless be employed at some time, as it has been in other countries, when opportunity tempted ambition.
Jackson could say a lot in a short space.
January 24th, 2012 09:39 PM
He would be imprisoned today for that brilliant statement sadly......or worse
January 24th, 2012 09:48 PM
Face it, he couldn't even get elected today! Too smart in the right direction!
You can educate ignorance, you can't fix stupid
Retired DE Trooper, SA XD40 SC, S&W 2" Airweight
dukalmighty & Pure Kustom Black Ops Pro "Trooper" Holsters, DE CCDW and LEOSA Permits, Vietnam Vet 68-69 Pleiku
January 24th, 2012 10:35 PM
I didn't think much of Jackson (for many reasons) until I read Lions of the West, Heroes and Villains of the Westward Expansion, by Robert Morgan. A marvelous read on a number of notable figures in history. It really filed a gap in my knowledge in US history, as well as more fully developing a better understanding of the framework the the myriad characters worked in at the time.
Morgan makes Jackson a more sympathetic character than my personal perception allowed, but does so in a fashion to explain it more as a function of the time in history and the inexorable tide of settlers westward.
America’s Manifest destiny comes to life in Robert Morgan’s skilled hands, from Thomas Jefferson’s birth in 1743 to the California Gold rush in 1849. Jefferson, a naturalist and visionary, dreamed that the United States would stretch across the continent from ocean to ocean. The account of how that dream became reality unfolds in the stories of Jefferson and nine other Americans whose adventurous spirits and lust for land pushed the westward boundaries: Andrew Jackson
, John “Johnny Appleseed” Chapman, David Crockett, Sam Houston, James K. Polk, Winfield Scott, Kit Carson, Nicholas Trist, and John Quincy Adams. Their tenacity was matched only by that of their enemies—the Mexican army under Santa Anna at the Alamo, the Comanche and Apache Indians, and the forbidding geography itself.
Anyway, a interesting quote.
"He went on two legs, wore clothes and was a human being, but nevertheless he was in reality a wolf of the Steppes. He had learned a good deal . . . and was a fairly clever fellow. What he had not learned, however, was this: to find contentment in himself and his own life. The cause of this apparently was that at the bottom of his heart he knew all the time (or thought he knew) that he was in reality not a man, but a wolf of the Steppes."
Search tags for this page
andrew jackson and the right to bear arms
andrew jackson on bearing arms
andrew jackson right to bear arms
was andrew jackson against standing army
what was andrew jackson's view on the right to bear arms
would you describe andrew jackson as brilliant
Click on a term to search for related topics.