a twist on using reloads for self defense

This is a discussion on a twist on using reloads for self defense within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I don't see any "getting in trouble" for using reloads in the above posts. What gets them in trouble is using a firearm in a ...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
Like Tree25Likes

Thread: a twist on using reloads for self defense

  1. #31
    VIP Member
    Array OldVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    S. Florida, north of the Miami mess, south of the Mouse trap
    Posts
    14,598
    I don't see any "getting in trouble" for using reloads in the above posts. What gets them in trouble is using a firearm in a sometimes questionable (?) circumstance, and them some prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves by harping on the reloads. And how many of those rediculas attempts resulted in a conviction? No more than any other lame concept a prosecutor can come up with. So what if forensics can't duplicate your reloads. That evidence against you becomes "inconclusive."

    For those who wish to "reduce the risks," perhaps you should consider further reducing those risks by not carrying a firearm at all.
    glockman10mm likes this.
    Retired USAF E-8. Avatar is OldVet from days long gone. Oh, to be young again.
    Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #32
    Member Array ares338's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    NE Texas
    Posts
    49
    Doesn't matter if you use hand loads, factory loads or horny toads....they will sue you regardless if that is their intent. The clean cut citizen formerly known as scumbag's family is going to ride the golden gravey train to a leisurely life.

  4. #33
    Senior Member Array Devilsclaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    KS
    Posts
    520
    Assume they would know they were reloaded rounds if they had access to the unfired rounds in the firearm. If you got this from Ayoob's book, the situation was actually that the data would have helped defend the shooter, but since it was reloaded ammo, there was no "base-line" to do testing against. In your second scenerio, of using reloaded rounds that they would know to be reloaded, then that just goes back to the first point. If you WANT them to know it is reloaded, then you would just disclose it--but as in the situation in Ayoob's book, that may or may not help your defense. I wouldn't worry about it too much either way. True, factory ammo is the way to go, but if I'm out hunting, and that's all I got, and someone attacked me, they are probably getting the low-powered SWC's used against them.

    I think there are many many other practices done by many shooters that would "Look" much worse if questioned in court. Those "Keep Honking--I'm reloading" bumper stickers on your pickup, the Skull and Crossbones grips on that tricked out 1911, the "Smile-Wait for Flash" Glock barrels, and various other things, that I guess are alright, until you are trying to explain that you really were NOT looking for a fight when the shooting happened. Look at all the trouble Zimmerman has had, can you imagine if he had had some radical gun slogan T-shirt or cap on?

    Apprearances DO matter, no matter how "entitled" one is to freedom of expression.

    Probably more of an issue in some places than others.

  5. #34
    Member Array SFCDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by OldVet View Post
    More super than a Zombie Killer? A Black Talon? That's pretty much the standard answer from those who really don't think about it. It's safe to say that. PDs usually carry something that they get a good discount on a mass government purchase.
    I carry factory ammo that is marketed as "defense". Generally hollow tip as typical. I can see the concerns with issues with self loaded ammunition in a self defense situation, however would that really be brought up in the case? I would expect more of a concern may have been failures due to issues with reloads.
    Former US Army SFC
    LTC-Class A HC: MA
    AG License: RI
    LTC: CT

  6. #35
    VIP Member Array glockman10mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    7,886
    And we must not forget, that in the " due process" part of criminal proceedings, there is a thing called " Motion for Discovery" in which the prosecution,, must lay out all of its evidence, which may later be disputed and, even forbidden for the prosecution to bring up, if it is shot down in a " suppresion hearing", which means, what ever is " suppressed" cannot be mentioned in trial.

    Unless the prosecution has a relevant reason for bring up handloads, such as to attempt to prove a premeditation ,or something else, then the judge may not even allow it, unless it is clearly releveant to the case presented against the accused.

    Unlike TV, the due process system is a long road with a lot of stops and hearings designed to shape the trial into a focused meeting with time constraints.
    Ignorance is a long way from stupid, but left unchecked, can get there real fast.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

anyone use starline brass for personal defence
,
are reloads legal in personal defense guns
,

can you legally use reloaded bullets for self defence

,
reloading for self defense
,
reloading self defense rounds
,
reloads for personal defense
,
reloads for self defence
,

reloads for self defense

,
reloads for selfdefense
,

self defense bullets for reloading

,

self defense reloads

,

using reloads for self defense

Click on a term to search for related topics.