Revive the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act

[jorge141020]

The petition is on the 'We The People' site. Please sign it here: http://wh.gov/mjod

[DefensiveCarry.com]

[archer51]

As far as I'm concerned, it can stay there forever. I DO NOT want the federal government regulating my carry. I can see them requiring mental health screenings with hand picked physicians. They'll make it so difficult it won't be worth the effort to attempt to carry.

[DontTreadOnI]

No thanks, for the reason stated above.

What the government giveth, the government taketh away.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2

[SmokinFool]

When we see the President and many members of Congress wanting to limit gun rights, why in the world would you want to give them the power to control carry laws??? My vote goes to keeping control of carry laws in the hands of the states. I see you're in WV. WV (at least at this time) allows for concealed and open carry. If you're worried about losing the right to carry in WV I suggest you write your representatives and let them know how you feel on the subject. In the few states that do not currently allow for carry the best thing people can do is let their reps know they support it, and ask everybody they know to do the same. And vote!

[1MoreGoodGuy]

Really?
CharlieBrown-POTUS-GoodGrief.jpg

[Jetfuelrm]

I'm going to go with what was stated above also.

[Brad426]

Welcome to the forum?

[OldVet]

If only it were as simple as if your DL is good here, it's good there. If your CWL is good here, it's good there. Somehow that's too simple for our gov't.

[archer51]

If only it were as simple as if your DL is good here, it's good there. If your CWL is good here, it's good there. Somehow that's too simple for our gov't.

Interesting how simple minded people can't grasp simple concepts.

[WarMachine]

This is your first post OP and its about this. The Gov controls to much as it is now. So thanks but no thanks.

[Grant48]

I DO NOT want the federal government regulating my carry.

Agreed. Once the federal government establishes a regulatory power over a given activity, who's to say that they don't eventually regulate it out of existence?

No thanks.

[Bark'n]

Not a good idea in my opinion.

Keep concealed carry issues on the State level and out of the Fed's hands.

[diver1102]

In theroy it sounds good but as others have stated once concealed carry is under the athority of the federal goverment it will be quickly taken away.

[Hopyard]

Arrrrrrr ayyyyyeeeeeee AGain! Just because you folks don't travel and think the US should work
exactly as it did in 1860 is no excuse for messing with my (and everyone else's) potentially greatly improved ability
to carry across the land.

Been on this board for years. Its always the same bunch, ready to pour cold water on a good idea out of
fear.

LEOSA has been good. FOPA has been good. National reciprocity would be great.

No one is suggesting that Uncle issue the licenses and NO ONE EVER HAS. The only thing being suggested is
that every state honor licenses issued by other jurisdictions. Its a great idea and way past time.

Duh, do they question your marriage when you go to another state? Do they stop you from driving?

I don't get it. All you "pro 2A" folks who don't want nationwide carry permissible.

You were for gun owner rights before you were against them? Or were against them before you were for them?

Look, I know some of you want licensing to disappear entirely but realistically that won't happen.
So, take a good deal when you can get it, if you can get it.

[TX expat]

Except it's not a good idea. It's a bad one.

And I'll be all for "nationwide" carry when the federal government steps in and tells ALL the states that concealed carry is a right guaranteed under the Second Amendment. No qualifications. No hinderances.

Until they do that, I will continue to believe that it's a bad idea. You can continue to think it's a good idea all you want...