Permit To Carry--Is A Training Requirement Good?
This is a discussion on Permit To Carry--Is A Training Requirement Good? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by cmidkiff
How about requiring a demonstration of proper punctuation and grammer [sic] from anyone wishing to author an article in the press...
October 25th, 2006 11:29 AM
Interesting example, as the mere publication is demonstration. This can (perhaps should?) apply to the carrying of lethal weapons as well, in which the misuse is addressed, not the mere carrying. Hm.
Originally Posted by cmidkiff
Though, in point of fact, the "major" press has Editors who do exactly this. Can't prove you can handle the basics? Your stuff doesn't see the light of day.
October 25th, 2006 12:39 PM
I haven't read this entire thread, but was just having a similar conversation a couple of days ago and wanted to chime in - I hope I don't repeat anything that's already been said.
Originally Posted by JimmyC
IMHO - Training, or demonstration of proficiency should absolutely be mandatory. In fact where I live, I think there is too little training requirement. I had to do a one day (8 hours if I remember correctly) course that focused on basic handgun safety, and home defense. I think that tactical scenarios as well as threat recognition and stress response should at least be discussed, if not drilled, and that concealment options, statutes and potential reprecussions of a shoooting should be covered in much more detail.
October 25th, 2006 01:02 PM
Originally Posted by SIGguy229
NH - No training required. Fill out your permit and submit it to your local police. 5-7 buisness days later, granted your background check is clean, you recieve your CCW permit that is valid for 4 years. Cost?
I don't want to see a training requirement for ANY CCW permit in the US. None. If you meet the requirements based on the background checks, you should be permitted to carry a concealed weapon. I'll certainly agree with Jeff's post earlier in the thread about the states and/or towns coming up with some type of training made available for free to each individual who obtains a permit. Make the training available, without cost, to everyone who obtains the permit but not mandate that training. The option should be there. I'd gladly pay another $10 for my permit knowing that others would have the opportunity to obtain some type of training after they received their permit.
Mandating is not the way to go IMHO.
"You've never lived until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know" - T.R.
<----My LT was unhappy that I did not have my PASS-Tag at that fire. But I found the body so he said he would overlook it. :)
October 25th, 2006 01:16 PM
FWIW - I don't think one should be required, for much the same reason P95 listed. Where do we draw the line on restriction of our rights? However, I do think there should be some sort of test or demonstration to show you know how to handle a firearm and/or state laws (something you can retake until you get it right). Is that hipocritical? Maybe. Do I know how to better define what I mean? No. I am somewhat leary about this due to a previous thread about what people didn't like about their class.... I recall someone saying that a member of their class wanted a CCW so they could shoot their neighbor's dog or something to that effect...
The Gunsite BlogITFT / Quick Kill Review
"It is enough to note, as we have observed, that the American people have considered the handgun to be the quintessential self-defense weapon." - Justice Scalia, SCOTUS - DC v Heller - 26 JUN 2008
October 25th, 2006 01:23 PM
While a agree with the concept that everyone who obtains a CCW should be able the show some dergee of compancy with firearms from a safety standpoint (if mere to prevent them from blowing their foot off). We run the risk of giving our goverment at some point in the future of regulating the law out of existence. The don't have to make illegal they can just make it impossible.
October 25th, 2006 01:25 PM
To hell with them , if they have a nd and someone is hurt i sincerely hope it is them , not someone in the area who had no involvement except to be there .
if mere to prevent them from blowing their foot off
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .
Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.
October 25th, 2006 01:29 PM
I agree with these points - I guess my concern lies within the ability of Joe Knucklehead who's never held a gun before, to obtain and carry get a ccw (and obviously firearm) with little or no training. For those of us who have some degree of experience, I feel less strongly about it. It is for this group, that I suggested being able to demonstrate some level of competancy - IMO Joe Knucklehead needs more training than is required in CO.
Less concerned with their own safety than that of the GP.
October 25th, 2006 01:37 PM
I don't think training should be required (or permits either for that matter). It is the responsibility of the citizen to know the law. They are just requiring training as a feel good measure to generate more revenue for the state.
07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006
Probably the only home based FFL that doesn't do transfers.
October 25th, 2006 01:42 PM
NONE! Yes training is good and I would hope and do encourage anyone who decides to carry to make the effort and go get that training. However, it should never be mandated or made a requirement. It's wrong in so many ways, I would need a few pages to post it all. It really just starts us moving in the wrong direction at the top of a very slippery slope. As to peaceful's "Free" idea...You all should be ashamed of yourselves, but I'll end with that as anything that mentions Taxes and FREE I'm going to go off ranting on.
Originally Posted by gddyup
October 25th, 2006 01:45 PM
Yes this is more of what I meant, not just a danger to themselves but to everyone else around them. I know most of us probaly have been at a public range were there was someone with no muzzle disclipne or had other dangerous habits. People who had no education with firearms but got a "gun 'cause its cool" or wanted to be a "bad a$$". I would like these people to be educated somehow with out risking my rights. Any suggestions?
Originally Posted by Redneck Repairs
October 25th, 2006 08:54 PM
You have no problem with the idea that there are some people who may want or need a concealed firearm and a license to carry it, but who can't easily come up with $250 on top of the cost of the gun? Why should it be so expensive? To keep out the poor, who shouldn't be able to have guns?
Originally Posted by farronwolf
October 25th, 2006 08:57 PM
I've got it, I know how to give everyone an education in proper handling of firearms......are you ready...... MANDATORY MILITARY SERVICE.
October 25th, 2006 09:08 PM
Makes perfect sense to me. Everyone gets training, they're already fingerprinted. The only extra thing needed would be a pamphlet or some sort of literature with the specific do's and dont's for that state.
Originally Posted by pgrass101
There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11? (Yuri Orlov [Nicolas Cage] Lord of War)
October 25th, 2006 09:39 PM
i agree 1000%
Originally Posted by SammyIamToday
October 25th, 2006 09:48 PM
Honestly, I would have gone kicking and screaming, but I still recognize now that if I'd had to do it, I'd have ended up better off.
Originally Posted by pgrass101
I think it's an idea whose time has come. How long before we are going to have a national guard troop on every corner like in Israel, because our enemies are just all around us and able to enter the U.S. at will?
It's not hard to see that we are in desperate need of a toughening-up of our populace. Been fat and lazy and prosperous for far too long. Everyone thinks that every single thing that's needed is something they can HIRE OUT for, most noticeably protection. We can't last long at this rate.
By JPCleary in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: February 18th, 2011, 07:42 PM
By fmcgraw in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
Last Post: December 23rd, 2010, 08:06 PM
By hayzor in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Last Post: April 1st, 2010, 08:35 PM
By kazzaerexys in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: March 10th, 2008, 04:00 PM
By WAPS in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
Last Post: January 21st, 2006, 09:06 AM
Search tags for this page
maine castle doctrine explained
Click on a term to search for related topics.