Shooting ability does not equal self defense ability

Shooting ability does not equal self defense ability

This is a discussion on Shooting ability does not equal self defense ability within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; All too often I come across young men who seem to equate their skill in shooting at paper targets that do not shoot back at ...

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 76
Like Tree40Likes

Thread: Shooting ability does not equal self defense ability

  1. #1
    Distinguished Member
    Array Old_Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,596

    Shooting ability does not equal self defense ability

    All too often I come across young men who seem to equate their skill in shooting at paper targets that do not shoot back at a range where the paper threat is only in front of you, with the ability to defend themselves against one or more bad guys who are trying to kill them, are moving fast and coming at them from all or unknown directions. I talk to them and make them try to understand that while target shooting brings something to the table in self defense, it does not bring enough to ensure you will survive. Most do not believe me as they have a mental image of themselves free and clear from the powerful effects of the adrenaline surge they have never experienced that comes when facing death.

    The only way to make them believers is to get them in a force on force class where they can experience a little bit of what it is like to make quick decisions, have to deal with multiple threats, need to fire quickly without the luxury of getting into a proper stance and obtaining a sight picture, etc.. Read a good story recently about someone using one of those video simulators that force you to make decisions. He saw a man robbing a woman at gun point, yelled to the robber to drop his gun and the robber turned and the screen went red meaning that the good guy was dead. The guy who was in the simulator said it was not fair because the robber just turned and shot him and that was not proper behavior. I think that illustrates how many people think. They form mental pictures of their gun fight in their heads and how they will handle certain situations but fail to realize that the reactions of the others involved in their mental image are not going to be as those assigned to them in real life. Anyway, those who know, know. Would be interesting to hear from others and what they think since they say only 1% of gun owners get any self defense training. I am sure that in some cases it is not needed but certainly in many other cases it might save your life or the life of others.
    The chief danger in life is that you may take too many precautions. - Alfred Adler


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array glockman10mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    9,368
    I reckon there is some truth in what you say there, but just between you, me, and the horses:

    I wouldn't have said that to "Jelly Bean" Bryce.
    Mike1956 and Aceoky like this.
    Ignorance is a long way from stupid, but left unchecked, can get there real fast.

  3. #3
    Member Array 91wm6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    301
    You have some great points. There are no rules in a gunfight!
    marcclarke likes this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array ntkb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Detroit Michigan
    Posts
    681
    While force on force is fine as a hand to hand thing, but when you start to think in terms of multiple attackers, in most cases the assailants will flee as soon as a gun is produced, weather or not shots are fired or not. With force on force the attackers don't have to risk their lives.
    1911 when a follow up shot just isn't an option

  5. #5
    Member Array gallardo.g23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    k-falls,oregon
    Posts
    407
    ya i would think if u started firing on the multiple attackers they would NOT keep charging like the vietcong, inless they are vietcong.. i made some steel targets a foot wide that sit on the ground i need to make some human sized ones. but i have 4 of them i set them up from 7 yards 4 yards and just set them at different yardage and i practice shooting on the side of my car/truck behind cover at the targets fast, also slow precise shots (i shoot at a gravel pit so i can do alota stuff you cant do at a range). ill also take shots at all different targets while walking back, forward, left and right

  6. #6
    VIP Member Array Ghost1958's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    6,381
    Nothing wrong with ranges and a lot of places i guess this the only place to go to shoot. Im rural so can shoot to my hearts content as far making my own target range changing it up etc. I only practice combat style shooting 95 percent of the time.

    Just a side note. While some BGs may run at the sight of a weapon, heck maybe most, trust me that there are quite a few that wont and making that assumption when you draw will likely get you killed.
    9MMare and manolito like this.
    " It is sad governments are chief'ed by the double tongues." quote Ten Bears Movie Outlaw Josie Wales

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array 9MMare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Outside Seattle, WA
    Posts
    3,309
    Not only that OP, I dont think people realize that the moment they draw that gun, EVERYONE else there reacts. Everyone...good guy and bad guy. You lose your element of surprise, someone may call attention to you, they may misunderstand your actions and interfere with your plan, they may get in your way, they may cause panic in what you thought one second before was a situation under your control, etc.

    And people that think they'll shoot accurately under fire or extreme stress are kidding themselves. That whole 'difficulty with minor motor functions' thing is not a myth and "Thunder Ranch simulation training" is not the same as real life.
    manolito likes this.
    Fortune favors the bold.

    Freedom doesn't mean safe, it means free.

    The thing about "defense" is that it has practically nothing to do with guns. (As passed on by CCW9MM)

  8. #8
    VIP Member Array 9MMare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Outside Seattle, WA
    Posts
    3,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Old_Dog View Post
    Read a good story recently about someone using one of those video simulators that force you to make decisions. He saw a man robbing a woman at gun point, yelled to the robber to drop his gun and the robber turned and the screen went red meaning that the good guy was dead. The guy who was in the simulator said it was not fair because the robber just turned and shot him and that was not proper behavior. I think that illustrates how many people think. They form mental pictures of their gun fight in their heads and how they will handle certain situations but fail to realize that the reactions of the others involved in their mental image are not going to be as those assigned to them in real life. .
    We discuss this here alot but if you have to draw your gun, you have to be ready to use it IMMEDIATELY. No waiting to give the other guy a chance. As you said...there are no rules (for them). No matter what an assailant is 'thinking' when they start to focus their attention on you....if that gun even hints to point towards you, you now must shoot. You are engaged, period. You cant wait to see if 'he really means to pull the trigger.'

    I think that is a huge mental committment that people need to understand and overcome BEFORE it ever occurs. And it's not easy. There are so many 'but what if's?' you can ask yourself. I think I have thought it through. I can only hope that I will actually do so if, God forbid, that time ever comes.

    (With that said, I am not a 'if my gun clear leather, they are going down' person. If the threat clearly stops when my weapon appears, I am more than happy to not fire.)

    It really is a matter of making sure you do not introduce a gun into a situation unless ALL the justifying factors are there...JOA

    IMO
    Fortune favors the bold.

    Freedom doesn't mean safe, it means free.

    The thing about "defense" is that it has practically nothing to do with guns. (As passed on by CCW9MM)

  9. #9
    VIP Member Array Ghost1958's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    6,381
    No FOF training simulation training or other training will truely prepare you for the real thing against an armed BG.
    No matter how you try to mindset yourself in training you will not be able to mindset yourself that you may die in training. Well heart attack maybe but not from your opponents. You know you wont be really killed or shot with a lethal anything.

    There is one heck of a difference and you will have miliseconds to overcome it should you ever face it. Not minutes.
    " It is sad governments are chief'ed by the double tongues." quote Ten Bears Movie Outlaw Josie Wales

  10. #10
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27,835
    Shooting ability does not equal self defense ability
    You're absolutely right. Accuracy is only one small component of ability to defend oneself. In a very real sense, self defense has little to do with firearms, per se. It's about all the rest of the equation. And, you're right, most folks don't have a clue until their eyes are opened for them via training.
    TX expat likes this.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  11. #11
    Distinguished Member
    Array manolito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Milford California
    Posts
    1,480
    Great post in my opinion. Reaction takes on average 3/4 of a second that is why action is faster than reaction. Taking cover may be the right answer not pulling a gun. Repositioning yourself before you deploy the weapon may save your life.

    There are two types of training being taught today as I see it. The police type of training mostly taught by off duty officers and then the military training taught by military trainers. There is a third taught by people that have never experienced the adrenalin rush of a confrontation but regirgitate what they have learned in a class giving the impression they know!

    If I have to survive a street situation I am going with my military training. The person following the police training will probably be on better footing in the court room if they survive.

    Just my opinion.

  12. #12
    VIP Member
    Array archer51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    22,149
    Range time gives you the basics of shooting. SA and training gives you the ability to survive a SD situation. Both are necessary, but I'll take the SA and training over range time if a choice has to be made.
    Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.

    USAF Retired
    NRA Life Member

  13. #13
    Distinguished Member Array BadgerJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic
    Posts
    1,530
    Notice how cops do it. They have two-man teams. This makes an encounter less chaotic. It's almost impossible to deal with multiples alone.

  14. #14
    VIP Member
    Array Mike1956's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Marion County, Ohio
    Posts
    11,461
    Quote Originally Posted by glockman10mm View Post
    I reckon there is some truth in what you say there, but just between you, me, and the horses:

    I wouldn't have said that to "Jelly Bean" Bryce.
    Such a worthwhile story I gave it its own thread: Something Glockman Mentioned on Another Thread-Jelly Bean Bryce
    "If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world, but I am sure we would be getting reports from Hell before breakfast."
    William T. Sherman

  15. #15
    Distinguished Member Array BadgerJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic
    Posts
    1,530
    In addition I don't think you can rely on your target-perforating skills in real life. Remember the IPSC guy who shot nearly point blank at a getaway car and missed with all five rounds from his revolver.

    I don't think Situational Awareness works - at all - you never get into it or attacked when you expect it. Yes you can have a highly developed SA but it has fail points. Finally, I don't think ANYONE (but a lucky few) can go from all range time, all F-on-F time to a real encounter and performs as expected. Freeze, flee, fight. Most freeze.

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

average gun shooter ability
,
defensive shooting ability
,
problems with shooting in self defence
,
shooting a man in the belly wont kill him but its a fast way to end a gunfight
,

what does cadence mean in terms of shootings for self defense

Click on a term to search for related topics.