Worthwhile legislation

This is a discussion on Worthwhile legislation within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I found this over @ the 1911forum and I know you all would enjoy knowing about this. ~A Citizens'Self-Defense Act of 2005...

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Worthwhile legislation

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091

    Worthwhile legislation

    I found this over @ the 1911forum and I know you all would enjoy knowing about this.

    ~A

    Citizens'Self-Defense Act of 2005

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091
    Citizens'Self-Defense Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)

    HR 47 IH

    109th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    H. R. 47
    To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense of self , family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement of such right.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    January 4, 2005
    Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A BILL
    To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense of self , family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement of such right.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Citizens'Self -Defense Act of 2005\'.

    SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:

    (1) Police cannot protect, and are not legally liable for failing to protect, individual citizens , as evidenced by the following:

    (A) The courts have consistently ruled that the police do not have an obligation to protect individuals, only the public in general. For example, in Warren v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App. 1981), the court stated: `[C]ourts have without exception concluded that when a municipality or other governmental entity undertakes to furnish police services, it assumes a duty only to the public at large and not to individual members of the community.\'.

    (B) Former Florida Attorney General Jim Smith told Florida legislators that police responded to only 200,000 of 700,000 calls for help to Dade County authorities.

    (C) The United States Department of Justice found that, in 1989, there were 168,881 crimes of violence for which police had not responded within 1 hour.

    (2) Citizens frequently must use firearms to defend themselves, as evidenced by the following:

    (A) Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals--or more than 6,500 people a day. This means that, each year, firearms are used 60 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.

    (B) Of the 2,400,000 self -defense cases, more than 192,000 are by women defending themselves against sexual abuse.

    (C) Of the 2,400,000 times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, 92 percent merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8 percent of the time, does a citizen kill or wound his or her attacker.

    (3) Law-abiding citizens , seeking only to provide for their families'defense , are routinely prosecuted for brandishing or using a firearm in self -defense . For example:

    (A) In 1986, Don Bennett of Oak Park, Illinois, was shot at by 2 men who had just stolen $1,200 in cash and jewelry from his suburban Chicago service station. The police arrested Bennett for violating Oak Park\'s handgun ban. The police never caught the actual criminals.

    (B) Ronald Biggs, a resident of Goldsboro, North Carolina, was arrested for shooting an intruder in 1990. Four men broke into Biggs'residence one night, ransacked the home and then assaulted him with a baseball bat. When Biggs attempted to escape through the back door, the group chased him and Biggs turned and shot one of the assailants in the stomach. Biggs was arrested and charged with assault with a deadly weapon--a felony. His assailants were charged with misdemeanors.

    (C) Don Campbell of Port Huron, Michigan, was arrested, jailed, and criminally charged after he shot a criminal assailant in 1991. The thief had broken into Campbell\'s store and attacked him. The prosecutor plea-bargained with the assailant and planned to use him to testify against Campbell for felonious use of a firearm. Only after intense community pressure did the prosecutor finally drop the charges.

    (4) The courts have granted immunity from prosecution to police officers who use firearms in the line of duty. Similarly, law-abiding citizens who use firearms to protect themselves, their families, and their homes against violent felons should not be subject to lawsuits by the violent felons who sought to victimize them.

    SEC. 3. RIGHT TO OBTAIN FIREARMS FOR SECURITY, AND TO USE FIREARMS IN DEFENSE OF SELF , FAMILY, OR HOME; ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) Reaffirmation of Right- A person not prohibited from receiving a firearm by Section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, shall have the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms--

    (1) in defense of self or family against a reasonably perceived threat of imminent and unlawful infliction of serious bodily injury;

    (2) in defense of self or family in the course of the commission by another person of a violent felony against the person or a member of the person\'s family; and

    (3) in defense of the person\'s home in the course of the commission of a felony by another person.

    (b) Firearm Defined- As used in subsection (a), the term `firearm'means--

    (1) a shotgun (as defined in section 921(a)(5) of title 18, United States Code);

    (2) a rifle (as defined in section 921(a)(7) of title 18, United States Code); or

    (3) a handgun (as defined in section 10 of Public Law 99-408).

    (c) Enforcement of Right-

    (1) IN GENERAL- A person whose right under subsection (a) is violated in any manner may bring an action in any United States district court against the United States, any State, or any person for damages, injunctive relief, and such other relief as the court deems appropriate.

    (2) AUTHORITY TO AWARD A REASONABLE ATTORNEY\'S FEE- In an action brought under paragraph (1), the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing plaintiff a reasonable attorney\'s fee as part of the costs.

    (3) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS- An action may not be brought under paragraph (1) after the 5-year period that begins with the date the violation described in paragraph (1) is discovered.

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,353
    Soulds like a good bill hope it will pass


    Got a new user name for a fun change Formerly know as tc300mag1

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091
    I am liking the new Name Bud. :rock: On post note, I have sent this proposed legislation to everyone I know.

    ~A

  6. #5
    Member Array SGeringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pierce Co. WA
    Posts
    330
    I love it. Just the fact we're on the offensive with what even a few years ago would be considered bold and unrealistic legislation is a good sign. Let's keep it up ladies and gentlemen.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091
    SG, please pass it to everyone you knwo in as many states as possible.

    ~A

  8. #7
    Member Array SGeringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pierce Co. WA
    Posts
    330
    Will do! :)

  9. #8
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    Just sent in my letter to J.D. Hayworth and sent the request to 10 of my friends and relatives

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091
    I hope this gains some national attention.

    ~A

  11. #10
    1943 - 2009
    Array Captain Crunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    10,371
    I sent an e-mail to MT Rep. Dennis Rehberg urging him to support this bill. He\'s pro-gun, he\'ll support it.

    Remember, this bill will have to pass the Senate, also.

    Anybody think the Brady bunch will support this legisltation?

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Now THIS is gun legislation
    By kapnketel in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: February 2nd, 2011, 11:48 AM
  2. NJ Legislation
    By rmilchman in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 20th, 2010, 03:35 PM
  3. Is it worthwhile to get licensed in as many states as you can?
    By MikeGoob in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2008, 07:45 AM
  4. SNAP CAPS ~ Worthwhile? Or.......
    By QKShooter in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: September 21st, 2005, 09:02 AM
  5. WorthWhile Reading
    By QKShooter in forum Defensive Books, Video & References
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: June 23rd, 2005, 11:07 PM