Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2005

Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2005

This is a discussion on Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2005 within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; HR 47 IH 109th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 47 To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense ...

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2005

  1. #1
    Administrator
    Array Administrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    The Control Room
    Posts
    1,224

    Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2005

    HR 47 IH 109th CONGRESS 1st Session

    H. R. 47
    To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense of self , family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement of such right.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    January 4, 2005
    Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A BILL
    To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense of self , family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement of such right.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Citizens' Self -Defense Act of 2005'.

    SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:

    (1) Police cannot protect, and are not legally liable for failing to protect, individual citizens , as evidenced by the following:

    (A) The courts have consistently ruled that the police do not have an obligation to protect individuals, only the public in general. For example, in Warren v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App. 1981), the court stated: `[C]ourts have without exception concluded that when a municipality or other governmental entity undertakes to furnish police services, it assumes a duty only to the public at large and not to individual members of the community.'.

    (B) Former Florida Attorney General Jim Smith told Florida legislators that police responded to only 200,000 of 700,000 calls for help to Dade County authorities.

    (C) The United States Department of Justice found that, in 1989, there were 168,881 crimes of violence for which police had not responded within 1 hour.

    (2) Citizens frequently must use firearms to defend themselves, as evidenced by the following:

    (A) Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals--or more than 6,500 people a day. This means that, each year, firearms are used 60 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.

    (B) Of the 2,400,000 self -defense cases, more than 192,000 are by women defending themselves against sexual abuse.

    (C) Of the 2,400,000 times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, 92 percent merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8 percent of the time, does a citizen kill or wound his or her attacker.

    (3) Law-abiding citizens , seeking only to provide for their families' defense, are routinely prosecuted for brandishing or using a firearm in self -defense. For example:

    (A) In 1986, Don Bennett of Oak Park, Illinois, was shot at by 2 men who had just stolen $1,200 in cash and jewelry from his suburban Chicago service station. The police arrested Bennett for violating Oak Park's handgun ban. The police never caught the actual criminals.

    (B) Ronald Biggs, a resident of Goldsboro, North Carolina, was arrested for shooting an intruder in 1990. Four men broke into Biggs'residence one night, ransacked the home and then assaulted him with a baseball bat. When Biggs attempted to escape through the back door, the group chased him and Biggs turned and shot one of the assailants in the stomach. Biggs was arrested and charged with assault with a deadly weapon -- a felony. His assailants were charged with misdemeanors.

    (C) Don Campbell of Port Huron, Michigan, was arrested, jailed, and criminally charged after he shot a criminal assailant in 1991. The thief had broken into Campbell's store and attacked him. The prosecutor plea-bargained with the assailant and planned to use him to testify against Campbell for felonious use of a firearm. Only after intense community pressure did the prosecutor finally drop the charges.

    (4) The courts have granted immunity from prosecution to police officers who use firearms in the line of duty. Similarly, law-abiding citizens who use firearms to protect themselves, their families, and their homes against violent felons should not be subject to lawsuits by the violent felons who sought to victimize them.

    SEC. 3. RIGHT TO OBTAIN FIREARMS FOR SECURITY, AND TO USE FIREARMS IN DEFENSE OF SELF, FAMILY, OR HOME; ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) Reaffirmation of Right- A person not prohibited from receiving a firearm by Section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, shall have the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms--

    (1) in defense of self or family against a reasonably perceived threat of imminent and unlawful infliction of serious bodily injury;

    (2) in defense of self or family in the course of the commission by another person of a violent felony against the person or a member of the person's family; and

    (3) in defense of the person's home in the course of the commission of a felony by another person.

    (b) Firearm Defined- As used in subsection (a), the term `firearm' means--

    (1) a shotgun (as defined in section 921(a)(5) of title 18, United States Code);

    (2) a rifle (as defined in section 921(a)(7) of title 18, United States Code); or

    (3) a handgun (as defined in section 10 of Public Law 99-408).

    (c) Enforcement of Right-

    (1) IN GENERAL- A person whose right under subsection (a) is violated in any manner may bring an action in any United States district court against the United States, any State, or any person for damages, injunctive relief, and such other relief as the court deems appropriate.

    (2) AUTHORITY TO AWARD A REASONABLE ATTORNEY\'S FEE- In an action brought under paragraph (1), the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing plaintiff a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs.

    (3) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS- An action may not be brought under paragraph (1) after the 5-year period that begins with the date the violation described in paragraph (1) is discovered.


  2. #2
    Member Array WyattEarp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Administrator
    (B) Former Florida Attorney General Jim Smith told Florida legislators that police responded to only 200,000 of 700,000 calls for help to Dade County authorities.

    (C) The United States Department of Justice found that, in 1989, there were 168,881 crimes of violence for which police had not responded within 1 hour.

    (B) Ronald Biggs, a resident of Goldsboro, North Carolina, was arrested for shooting an intruder in 1990. Four men broke into Biggs'residence one night, ransacked the home and then assaulted him with a baseball bat. When Biggs attempted to escape through the back door, the group chased him and Biggs turned and shot one of the assailants in the stomach. Biggs was arrested and charged with assault with a deadly weapon -- a felony. His assailants were charged with misdemeanors.
    Excellent Read, very interesting, thanks.

    I can't believe some of these things!! I hope this bill gets passsed.
    Stops Jihad on Contact

  3. #3
    Member Array Amegatek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    19
    This is my favorite part of the bill. I hope it gets passed this year. However, this bill has been around for about 5 years now, and seems to get squashed every year. Keep your fingers crossed!

    Quote Originally Posted by Administrator
    (4) The courts have granted immunity from prosecution to police officers who use firearms in the line of duty. Similarly, law-abiding citizens who use firearms to protect themselves, their families, and their homes against violent felons should not be subject to lawsuits by the violent felons who sought to victimize them.
    Gun control is hitting your target.
    -- Amegatek
    Amegatek's Firearms Page

  4. #4
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    Quote Originally Posted by Amegatek
    This is my favorite part of the bill. I hope it gets passed this year. However, this bill has been around for about 5 years now, and seems to get squashed every year. Keep your fingers crossed!
    It's probably too good to be true and you know what they say about that. We can only hope.....
    Bumper
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.

  5. #5
    Member Array nf9648's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Fort Hood, Texas
    Posts
    75
    Would this null the handgun bans in places like Cook County?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091
    How can one find out about the status of this bill. I would like to let my HORep know that I would like them to supprt this bill.
    Fave Quotes

    The main reason Santa is so jolly is because he knows where all the bad girls live!!!

    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

    The worst thing in this world, next to anarchy, is government.
    Henry Ward Beecher

  7. #7
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    Quote Originally Posted by APachon
    How can one find out about the status of this bill. I would like to let my HORep know that I would like them to supprt this bill.
    This has the links and the bill in it's current form. I may need to contact mine again.

    The Orator
    Bumper
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network LLC
    By TheSaiga308 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: January 10th, 2011, 07:48 PM
  2. H.R. 17: Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2009 (A Trojan Horse!)
    By Janq in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: January 30th, 2009, 09:45 AM
  3. H.R. 648: Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2003
    By Bumper in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 10th, 2005, 12:17 AM
  4. Citizens' Self-Defense Act of 2001
    By CHPBill in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 19th, 2004, 03:43 AM

Search tags for this page

citizens using concealed carry for self defense

,

court issues and armed citizen self defense

,

firearm self defense against an armed assailant

,

florida cases where law abiding citizens were prosecuted for shooting robbers in self defense

,

home defense act 2005

,

ron citizen defence act

Click on a term to search for related topics.