SYG Legal Discussion and poll

SYG Legal Discussion and poll

This is a discussion on SYG Legal Discussion and poll within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; First the link: Taking Justice Into Your Own Hands: Part 3 - Cases that Prove the Rules ... or Not This is part of a ...

Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By noway2
  • 2 Post By Hatrix

Thread: SYG Legal Discussion and poll

  1. #1
    Distinguished Member Array noway2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,952

    SYG Legal Discussion and poll

    First the link: Taking Justice Into Your Own Hands: Part 3 - Cases that Prove the Rules ... or Not

    This is part of a series that a group on the Daily Kommunist has been running. The group is predominantly antis who are operating under the guise of trying to understand firearms law so that they can make better reasoned arguments against it.

    The link contains a poll: "Should more responsibility be imposed on those who carry a gun?" with a simple yes no response. Site registration is NOT required to answer the poll.

    Let's light this one up and give the antis a serious kick in the rear.
    Nmuskier likes this.


  2. #2
    Distinguished Member Array Nmuskier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Upper Michigan
    Posts
    1,756
    Communists are against an armed populace? (elsewhere on the sight) Communists are for population control is abortion, and are against freedom of religion? Thank you Captain Obvious!

    OP is spot on. Light this up, and do not take the progressive nature of these groups write your future.


    (is it coincidence that nearly all of the headlines on that site are also on MSNBC?)

  3. #3
    VIP Member
    Array msgt/ret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,772
    Taking Justice Into Your Own Hands:


    The title alone screams anti-gun, after all they accuse us of being bloodthirsty vigilantes just looking for any excuse to gun down anyone.
    When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
    "Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array Hatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    918
    They'll just claim their site was hacked, same thing every other failed anti poll claims when they don't get the results they want.
    msgt/ret and noway2 like this.

    Master of the Tactical Back Flip
    Internet Gun Expert

  5. #5
    VIP Member Array Harryball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lansing Mi
    Posts
    7,751
    From the article
    1.When you hold a firearm, you have lethal power in your hands. 2. A gun is not like a baseball bat or a knife or a lawnmower. 3. It is a dangerous and powerful weapon readily used by the unskilled, the care-less, the trigger-happy. Carrying a gun enhances, empowers and enables the carrier.
    1. To his first point, yes guns do carry responsibility.

    2. Really..

    3. A antis view of what gun owners are. Nothing more than typical anti BS.....
    Don"t let stupid be your skill set....

    Never be ashamed of a scar. It simply means, that you were stronger than whatever tried to hurt you......

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array sdprof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Near the Black Hills of SD
    Posts
    1,174
    That poll question is loaded, so to speak.

    How does one "impose" responsibility on someone?

    We are responsible for our actions, SYG or not. How can more responsibility be imposed?

    I'm not falling into that one, there's no good answer either way.
    ~~~~~
    The only common sense gun legislation was written about 224 years ago.

    I carry always not because I go places trouble is likely, but because trouble has a habit of not staying in its assigned zone.

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,434
    It's pathetic, IMO, how the anti-gunner claims regarding Stand Your Ground statutes typically entail one unrelenting drum beat: claim SYG, and get off scott-free. Nothing could be further from the truth, of course. It still has to be vetted through the judicial process; it's not a blank check, a free pass or anything else the anti's claim. Not a single state's SYG statutes are written that way. Even the stiffest of them simply dictates that the DA must essentially show that it couldn't have been self-defense in order to proceed with a prosecution. IMO, that's as it should be anyway. Fail to have your ducks in a row as a claimed defender, via screwing up the story or claiming things the forensics roundly prove false, then you earn every bit of prosecution that comes your way.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •