Red dot or reflex sight for CCW?
This is a discussion on Red dot or reflex sight for CCW? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; In the newest issue (April/May 2007) of Handguns Magazine there is an article by Dave Spaulding (The Combative Pistol Sight on pg 56) which contrasts ...
February 27th, 2007 08:03 PM
Red dot or reflex sight for CCW?
In the newest issue (April/May 2007) of Handguns Magazine there is an article by Dave Spaulding (The Combative Pistol Sight on pg 56) which contrasts and compares the various types of pistol sights from a defensive use standpoint.
One of the sights is JP Enterprises (jprifles.com) version of The Doctor called the J Point.
It is lighter and less expensive than the Doctor but is not as precise.
The question I have is it something you would use for a combat pistol? Either nightstand, open carry or CCW?
February 27th, 2007 08:03 PM
February 27th, 2007 08:08 PM
I wouldn't use one for any type of carry. Good luck getting a holster to fit a pistol with that that allows for a good clean draw. Just one more thing to go wrong, and it doesn't look like you can use the sights with one, so what do you do if it somehow gets turned on and the betteries get run down and then you really need it (like on Murphy's Birthday).
I would buy a set of crimson trace grips for less (and I don't really like lasers on most types of weapons), before I put that sight on a pistol.
As far as home defense, you still have the problem of one more thing that can and will go wrong.
Fortes Fortuna Juvat
Former, USMC 0311, OIF/OEF vet
NRA Pistol/Rifle/Shotgun/Reloading Instructor, RSO, Ohio CHL Instructor
February 27th, 2007 08:10 PM
Opinions may vary quite a bit but IMO a reflex sight is a luxury that may well not really be used to effect, in extremis.
My only concession to additions is my CT grips - beyond which the open sights are all I want. they are night sights but to be honest I doubt those will ever really come into their own as a feature.
Even with very poor old eyes and so a poor sight picture I'd still place all emphasis on a degree of point shooting, with sighting of any sort being a possible luxury.
If time permitted and light was below max bright then every possibility I would see my laser dot without seeking it - but main intention always is to point as primary mode, followed by more defined sighting should time permit.
Thing is - on balance we are most likely to be up close and personal and I don't feel reflex devices gain us anything to speak of - altho great for longer range deliberate shooting. Plus they can add to holster headaches.
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
- a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
February 27th, 2007 10:45 PM
Dot sights are great for target or hunting guns, but I find the optics way too big for CC
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson
Nemo Me Impune Lacesset
February 28th, 2007 12:50 AM
The dot sight he is referring to replaces the rear sight on the handgun, and fits most holsters.
Even if it was a standard red dot sight, couldn't one of our fine custom holster makers on this forum make one? Or he could use one of the speed style holsters that have most of the front cut away.
As for using it for HD, I think that would be a good idea as you focus on the threat, and the red dot is best used by focusing on the target. The battery and reliablility arguments are rather pointless at this time, since we see battery lives in the hundred of hours and reliability good enough for the military to put them on almost every longarm in their inventory.
Last edited by AutoFan; February 28th, 2007 at 12:52 AM.
Reason: spelling, grammar
February 28th, 2007 01:19 AM
The ones the military uses are quite a bit bigger and more rugged than anything you could reasonably mount on a pistol. In addition, most military rifles also have backup iron sights in case the optic fails. As you pointed out, these replace the rear sight, so no backup.
Originally Posted by AutoFan
February 28th, 2007 10:24 AM
A few misconceptions. Here's a link to the Jpoint, although there area few other makes, of similar dimensions.
Carry is not a problem, the sight is no wider than the slide on a Glock, is far enough to the rear of the slide that it does not contact the holster, and, though it is higher, is kept away from your body by any normal sweat guard.
Very fast. More speed/accuracy friendly, as you have more full view of the target; the target is not able to "drop" from sight quite so readily, as the slide and your hands are lower in your field of view. As far as BUIS, this is no different than the Eotech- you put the target in the window and "Bang!".
Batteries are not a durability issue- I've shot a mix of hot (Corbon) and standard loads (WWB), and not had a "blink" or fade. Duration- I'm waiting to see. IIRC, Kelly McCann was reporting >12 months with no degradation. (If you are of the school of "clean my gun once every six months", changing a $1.25 battery each Christmas should not be a problem. )
500 rounds so far. Sturdy enough to rack on my belt/boot/whatever. The experience goes on. My other Glocks still have XS sights, if I continue to like what I'm experiencing with my second-hand Optima, I will be getting a new Jpoint, with the upgraded diode and water seal. At least one......
FYI- you can whale hard (ie, baton-blows)on a dufflebag, using the sight as an impact point and it doesn't hurt it.
Last edited by Rob72; February 28th, 2007 at 10:33 AM.
February 28th, 2007 10:59 AM
I would not use a red dot or reflex sight for my conceal weapons. Steve48
February 28th, 2007 03:21 PM
Nice for hunting and plinking but it stops there. Anything protruding , even as limited as it is, is a high risk of it slowing the draw, not to mention, battery life, in a defensive situation there will be no time to turn the sight on and to look through the glass for the red dot. No thanks, give me good ol'e iron sights that I can acquire quickly and accuratley.
When Seconds Count, The Cops Are Just Minutes Away!!
February 28th, 2007 09:55 PM
I'm not familiar with the sight your talking about, but I just put Suresights on my xd .45 and I love 'em. They pick up super fast, they fit in most holsters, and they're very bright in low light situations w/o fiber optics or battery.
March 1st, 2007 11:34 AM
Looks good to me - but - I'd like to be able to give it a trial use for a month THEN make up my mind & not have to pay until then. Fat chance of this ever happening....
I just might like it but don't want to chance not liking it and losing $$$
For God, Family and Country!
March 1st, 2007 01:12 PM
I'm not affiliated with the seller,other than acquiring one of my Optimas from him. He's GTG:
Originally Posted by ArmyCop
Not everyone has $100 to try something out, I realize. Having done some research, and seeing some of the users and their usage of the Docter-style sight, I decided it was worth the gamble. The Optimas from sacchan appear to be factory refurbs, and are 1/2-1/3 the price
of the JPoint. Having tried one for a couple of high volume sessions,and 6 months, I'm fairly certain I'll be paying for the upgraded JPoint.
Anyone remember night sights being called "novelties", 15-20 years ago.......?
AC, if you have a Glock, LMK. I have another Optima, with Glock base I'd be willing to share for a month or so. Its a "first-generation", and takes a bit more tinkering with the screws to zero, but seems as solid as the one I got from the guy above.
March 1st, 2007 01:45 PM
Yep. I also remember rifle scopes being called too fragile for dangerous game. I remember variable scopes being called too prone to failure for >30 caliber rifles. I remember the hatred for the M16 when it first came out. I remember lasers being called toys until the military/SWAT started using them. I remember red dots being called toys until the military started putting them on almost every longarm. I remember polymer pistols being called junk and toys until Glocks were issued to cops.
Originally Posted by Rob72
Personally I think the JPoint (or something very similiar) is the best sighting option out there right now, especially for those of us with aging eyes.
March 1st, 2007 01:50 PM
Of course, at one point, rifle scopes were too fragile for dangerous game, variable scopes were to prone to failure on high caliber rifles, the M16 did suck when it first came out (at least when firing the ammo the Army issued), and lasers and red dots were toys. Then the quality and ruggedness of all of these things improved until they reached the point where they were ready for serious use. So, the question is: have reflex pistol sights reached this point? Are you sure enough that they have that you'd be willing to bet your life on it?
Originally Posted by AutoFan
Quite frankly, I'm not, but YMMV.
By Macattack in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Last Post: June 7th, 2010, 04:06 PM
By NY27 in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Last Post: April 14th, 2009, 09:35 PM
By vic2367 in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Last Post: May 14th, 2008, 04:12 AM
By Alien Nation in forum Related Gear & Equipment
Last Post: July 2nd, 2007, 02:30 PM
By Bryan in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Last Post: October 22nd, 2006, 03:14 PM
Search tags for this page
ccw red dot
concealed carry red dot sight
concealed carry reflex sight
doctor reflex sight
red dot ccw
red dot for ccw
red dot on ccw
red dot sight for concealed carry
red dot sight for xd 45
reflex pistol sights
reflex sight for concealed carry
reflex sights for pistols
Click on a term to search for related topics.