how to counter this anti-gun argument?

This is a discussion on how to counter this anti-gun argument? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; My families hearts and prayers/wishes go out to all those touched by this terrible event. In July 1983 Billy Ferry (a known "WACK JOB" in ...

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 67

Thread: how to counter this anti-gun argument?

  1. #16
    Member Array Elder51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Pinellas County, Florida
    Posts
    73

    It is not the method... It's the PERP. Billy Ferry (Tampa Fla)

    My families hearts and prayers/wishes go out to all those touched by this terrible event.

    In July 1983 Billy Ferry (a known "WACK JOB" in the neighbohood) Killed 5 people Mutilated 13 others at a Winn Dixie grocery store in a quiet shopping plaza in Tampa Fl.

    Because of "WEAK" laws, no "BACKGROUND CHECKS", and "EASY" access to his weapons he was able to destroy the lives of 18 people and their families and friends.

    However, he brought no AK-47's, AR-15's, High Cap. Magazines, High power auto loading hand guns or wear a bullet proof vest. What he did bring was a few gallons of gasoline, matches, and ANGER!!!

    This "MADMAN" threw the gasoline across the check out lanes and light a match..... MANY DIED AND MANY MORE WERE HORRIBLY BURNED & DISFIGURED.

    YOU CANNOT KEEP A SOCIOPATH FROM WEAPONS OF MAYHEM AND MASS MURDER.... ALL YOU CAN DO IS BE AWARE AND BE READY TO STOP THEM WHEN THEY ATTEMPT TO STRIKE OR ATLEAST MINIMIZE THE NUMBERS THEY MURDER

    Angry people (I use the term loosely) have and will used cars, gasoline, improvised bombs (Oklahoma), bottles of poisened over the counter medicines, and to many other methods to list.

    OUR ONLY HOPE IS IN VIGILENCE, PREPARATION, AND DETERMINATION NOT TO LET THEM CONTINUE
    Condition "yellow" is a heightened state of awareness & response.
    It is not paranoia...
    "IT IS YOUR ONLY ROUTE TO SURVIVAL"

    An armed & knowledgeble Citizen has significantly increased their chances of continued Freedom & Safety... SO ALSO IMPROVED IS THE FUTURE OF THEIR NEIGHBORS

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    VIP Member
    Array srfl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,870
    Chris....I feel for you, I've gotten into a "debate" of sorts with some moron:

    http://polstate.com/?p=5081

    (I'm SR)
    USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947

  4. #18
    Ex Member Array HOLYROLLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    269
    Rob99VMI04...+1, well spoken.

  5. #19
    VIP Member
    Array Miggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Miami-Dade, FL
    Posts
    6,258
    Julio Gonzalez (87) Cuban born Gonzalez came to the United States in the 1980 Mariel boat lift. Ten years later, in a fit of jealousy, he killed eighty-seven partiers. Pi**ed off at his ex-girlfriend, Lydia Feliciano, who was dancing with someone else, Julio bought a buck's worth of gasoline and torched the Bronx's Happy Land Social Club killing nearly everyone inside. Only six survived. As luck would have it, one of them was lucky Lydia, his ex-girlfriend.
    You have to make the shot when fire is smoking, people are screaming, dogs are barking, kids are crying and sirens are coming.
    Randy Cain.

    Ego will kill you. Leave it at home.
    Signed: Me!

  6. #20
    Ex Member Array HOLYROLLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    269
    When we go into combat, we take a gun. Not gasoline , fertilizer or medicine. It is the best way to take lives person to person, period.

  7. #21
    Distinguished Member Array mr.stuart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    usa-southeast texas
    Posts
    1,646

    I agree with Jah


  8. #22
    Ex Member Array HOLYROLLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    269
    Who?

  9. #23
    VIP Member Array rodc13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    2,753
    "All men are not created equal. Sam Colt made 'em that way."

    Guns have been called the great equalizer. They allow individuals to defend themselves from the tyranny of force and violence as they would not otherwise be capable.

    Without them, power is in the hands of those individuals or groups with greater physical strength. Women are chattel, the slight are slaves to the strong. Gangs rule. Civil servants are civil masters. There is no check on the power of a despot.

    Getting rid of guns would not get rid of the power of force and violence, but rather concentrate that power in the hands of those with the greatest potential to abuse it.
    Cheers,
    Rod
    "We're paratroopers. We're supposed to be surrounded!" Dick Winters

  10. #24
    Senior Member Array tanksoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,133
    Criminal still get guns in the UK where private ownership of handguns is almost impossible. Even their Olympic pistol team has to practice outside the UK... yet crimes committed with firearms have increased since the ban.

    Criminals will ALWAYS be able to get guns no matter what the law says... here, Europe, wherever.
    "I am a Soldier. I fight where I am told, and I win where I fight." GEN George S. Patton, Jr.

  11. #25
    Senior Member Array Timmy Jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    759
    It does not matter!

    There is no way to abolish all guns and therefore all the good people need to carry one, or two.

    Is your sister intelligent enough to understand that there is no way to abolish all guns?

    "She wants all guns abolished"

    I want to keep my loved ones safe!
    Timmy Jimmy

    If it is not in the US Constitution then the Federal Government should not be doing it.

    "Carrying a gun is a social responsibility."

  12. #26
    Distinguished Member Array Bob The Great's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Slidell, LA
    Posts
    1,688
    Quote Originally Posted by HOLYROLLER View Post
    You cant argue that point because she's right. Regardless of the motive of the person wielding the gun, whether to protect life or to take it, this is best accomplished with a gun. Its primary function is to make killing more efficient, and it does just that. That is why we all choose to carry a gun rather than a knife or an axe. The effectiveness of edged and other weapons is always trumped by a gun.
    This is true, but misleading, and it's the reason this argument is so popular.

    Yes, currently the most effective weapon on the planet in the vast majority of situations is the gun. But, in this case, banning the most effective weapon in favor of a lesser weapon is an answer that implies an unrealistic assumption. That assumption is that banning possession of an item will make it impossible for people to get it.

    As was already pointed out, a good analogy is the drug trade. Legitimate gun sales to people who then comit crimes would vanish, this is true, but black-market or other illegal sales would quickly take their place. If your goal is fewer legal guns, this doesn't matter, but if your goal is truly fewer guns total in the hands of criminals, banning them is probably counter-productive.

    As was also pointed out, another assumption is that banning the most effective weapon would have more good consequences than bad. Guns are an equalizer that gives power to those who otherwise would not have it (like the wheelchair-bound grandmother). Taking that power away (even if we go into fantasy-land and assume that the BG's will give up theirs too) will only widen the gap between every-day citizens and those who prey on them.

  13. #27
    Senior Member Array Daddy Warcrimes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    736
    How about, "That's a good idea. How do we get the criminals to go along with it?"

    As much as I like guns, I'd rather not need them. I'd rather not need locks on my doors or a police force or a military. We ought to eliminate crime first.
    "and suddenly I can not hold back my sword hand's anger"

    DaddyWarcrimes.com

  14. #28
    New Member Array Chmara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4
    WARNING - The below thoughts will NOT make you popular or understood in your support of the Second Amendment.


    There is NO argument with someone who comes to a belief out of fear -- and fear is contagious. Yes it is true a gun can kill and wound faster than an ax or knife -- but we have also seen people make bombs out of fertilizer and do much more damage.

    Maybe the answer is to confidently teach people to defend themselves. If indeed the people at the scene had abdicated their rights to self protection with a firearm, and no one except the police was carrying -- it is sure the perp was able to move and shoot without resistance.

    Now can we, as taxpayers, afford to put a policeman (defense gunman) in every school building and public facility to guard against people with guns, axes and knives?

    It may seem calous, but what if there were other students carrying arms who had been trained to protect themselved and thjeir peers as the second amendment contemplated? It is possible the mayhem would have ended sooner -- BUT -- just as with an axe, knife, gasoline or a bomb -- no one could preclude (in a free society)
    this type or irrational act. One could only conclude it with an outcome that was not as inclusive IF guns were used. Bombs and Gas????

    I find it interesting that one teacher had spotted the trend in the individual toward irrational thought -- but could not get any action in a second look at him by mental health authorities.

    If the teachers and profs or students had generally been armed -- would the individual have wide ranged before a response? Interesting too is that he took his own life -- and was not dealt with by uniformed armed response by law enforcement who was away investigating the first two killings.

    That is not to blame them -- it is a realization that lawmen cannot do it all -- cannot be everywhere and citizens MUST take responsibility for some of their own safety. It is horrendous that so many innocents were killed -- and had NO response except flight - with the one lone exception.

    That exception - was a man who survived the dissarming of citizens by the Nazis, survived the camps and knew that if he did not give his unarmed students the chance to flee they would not survive. His is the sacrifice those who oppose an armed citizenry should consider.

  15. #29
    Senior Member Array purple88yj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Piedmont Triad, NC
    Posts
    1,100
    As I put it to some others on another, unrelated board that I frequent:

    Those that would have me disarm fear not me or my gun, but my ability to set myself apart from the rest by being able to fight back.
    "A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in ... And how many want out." British Prime Minister Tony Blair

  16. #30
    Ex Member Array HOLYROLLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    269
    Rodc13...chattel, despot? Bob The Great...I am obviously not for a ban on guns, but at the same time I dont believe we should deny that the primary purpose of the guns we carry, that is to kill. I have chosen to bear the responsibilty of CC and I take it seriously.

    I agree with Chmara, it seems as though many people today cry foul when the "authorities" fail to do enough to protect us. The burden has been shifted from the individual to the civil/federal gov't. Personal responsibilty is avoided at all cost...strange.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Over the counter for Thyroid?
    By ArmyCop in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: December 17th, 2010, 11:06 PM
  2. Anti's "escalation" argument???
    By Agent47 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: August 17th, 2009, 01:01 PM
  3. One Anti-Assault Weapon argument I find flawed.
    By Thanis in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: September 15th, 2008, 01:40 AM
  4. What is the "Anti" argument?
    By DasBoot in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: December 24th, 2007, 10:05 PM
  5. An anti-gun story and my argument
    By Kel-Tec2006 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 26th, 2006, 08:35 AM

Search tags for this page

anti gun counter arguments
,
anti gun wack jobs
,
argument to keep a gun
,
billy ferry fire
,

billy ferry winn dixie

,

billy ferry winn dixie fire

,

concealed carry arguments

,

counter anti gun argument

,
countering anti gun arguments
,
counters to anti gun arguments
,
how to counter gun argument
,
how to counter the anti gun arguement
Click on a term to search for related topics.