Are you "qualified" with every gun you carry?

Are you "qualified" with every gun you carry?

This is a discussion on Are you "qualified" with every gun you carry? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Another issue for the masses: Are you qualified on every gun you carry? That is, do you have some documentation that proves that you have ...

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Are you "qualified" with every gun you carry?

  1. #1
    Member Array SSKC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    357

    Question Are you "qualified" with every gun you carry?

    Another issue for the masses: Are you qualified on every gun you carry? That is, do you have some documentation that proves that you have passed some sort of shooting qualification for each model that you carry? Do you feel uncomfortable carrying a gun without some proof of competence, even though you have practiced and are comfortable shooting it? Does anyone think this is important for legal reasons?

    Thanks.

    SSKC


  2. #2
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,577

    It's Interesting

    In Pennsylvania there are no qualifications necessary for any handgun that is carried. We can carry any handgun that we can affford to buy. There is no written documentation and absolutely no range, written, or oral testing required as part of obtaining a License To Carry Concealed.
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array Euclidean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,213
    In Texas about the closest thing we have to something like this is we have licenses split into SA licenses and NSA licenses.

    SA - semiautomatic
    NSA - non semiautomatic

    Now get this logic. If you qualify with any semiautomatic pistol of an appropriate sized caliber, you can carry anything that's legal for you to posess basically.

    However if you qualify with a non semiautomatic pistol you may not carry a semiautomatic pistol.

    It makes me want to go qualify with a single action revolver or a falling block design pistol. What kind of license do I receive then? What if I used my black powder gun? What kind of license is that?

    It's silliness in one of its myriad forms. Look I believe it's my responsibility to learn my manuals of arms for anything I own, but gosh darn it you have to let people figure it out for themselves sometimes.

    I took my driver's license test with a car, but now I drive a pickup truck. My financial situation improved and I found a vehicle more to my tastes. Sure it's different from driving a car but I still drive it every day and I haven't caused an accident yet.

    Now do I agree with the sentiment you should be capable of qualifying with every gun you might carry? Yes. I could do it even with my hard to shoot sometimes 642. Can I see how it might be useful to show in court you have competence? Yes.

    Now this here is the one thing about the Texas CCW program I like. Your training/proof of competency form says either you fired a semiautomatic or a non semiautomatic and it says you either passed or failed. That's as clear as it needs to be in a courtroom.

    It just amuses me though that I could have fired .357 or my snubnose when I took the test and it would have demonstrated more skill to qualify that way than it did with my P89, yet if I had taken the test with one of my revolvers the state would essentially have me classified as not competent to carry any semiautomatic pistol.

    Explain that! You can't! It's madness!

    What fuels this idea? That a semiautomatic is more complicated? Is there really a functional difference between a DAO or decock only semiautomatic and a revolver? They're both pull trigger go bang no safety to get in the way affairs.

    I hate the whole idea to be honest with you. You should be able to take means to protect yourself because you're a rational human being not because you pass some state mandated test. But given the current sociopolitical climate I can see why it would be a concern.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Array APachon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,091
    in Clark Cty NV you can only carry that with which you have qualified so yes I am qual'd to carry everything I chose to carry. I made it a point to qual with every 1911 platform pistol I own.

    ~A
    Fave Quotes

    The main reason Santa is so jolly is because he knows where all the bad girls live!!!

    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

    The worst thing in this world, next to anarchy, is government.
    Henry Ward Beecher

  5. #5
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    I have an military Expert Marksmanship Badge, if that counts. We are not required to "qualify" on any particular design, or worse, a particular gun in Arizona. I have no "official" qualification nor do I feel I need the State to declare me "qualified".
    Bumper
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array rfurtkamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pocatello, Idaho
    Posts
    940
    No qualification requirements here.

    I don't believe there should be any more requirements to carry a firearm than to operate a printing press - these are constitutionally guaranteed rights, and any regulation as far as restrictions go only serve to limit the ability of the people to exercise said rights.

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,353
    No qualification requirments here either sure ive practised a lot with everything i carry

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array Prospector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    615

    Red face

    Being a fellow Texan, Euclidean brings up valid points. The instructors here look to see if you can demonstrate some degree of familiarity and safety in handling the firearm you bring to qualify with and can at least be consistent in hitting a fairly good-sized target...frankly I don't believe it should matter what type firearm you choose to carry.....anybody out there carry a "flintlock" ?
    Attached Images

  9. #9
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    21,961
    Quote Originally Posted by Prospector
    I don't believe it should matter what type firearm you choose to carry.....anybody out there carry a "flintlock" ?
    Yup! Except mine is a bit longer.
    Rick

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

  10. #10
    Member Array armoredman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    484
    I qualified Distinguished Expert with the Department issued Glock 19. I will never carry one off duty, either. My CZ75 PO1 is more comfortable and accurate than the Grock, and I like the short DA of the decocked hammer far better than the "safe action" Grock trigger, (nope, that wasn't a mispselling).
    I don't have to "qualify" with an off duty gun, unlike some Departments do, nor am I restricted to what I may carry, which is very good.
    I don't believe in qualification to carry, because that is yet another restriction on our guarenteed rights, acknowledged by the Constitution. That gives the goverment, whether local, state or Fed, the ability to deny your rigths by saying you didn't "qualify". How high do you think someone like UpChuckie Schumer or Diane Feinslime would make the bar? Perfect score at 50 yards, one handed? 5 shots in 5 seconds, with a single shot pistol?
    No, on the other hand, more training is better, ad looks better in court on a good, justifiable shoot. I have several certificates and such, and I wholeheartedly support people getting all the training they can afford, (some of this is expensive!), including just shooting IDPA when available! Everything helps!
    If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous?

  11. #11
    Member Array michael t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    outback Ky
    Posts
    158
    Our permit is the 2nd What the state hands out just makes them money and is a form of gun control. Ky doesn't care what we carry just that we have the card. (shows we paid our bribe )
    1990, 1992 Colt Mustang 1941 Colt USGI 1951 Colt Commander 9MM
    1972 Colt Combat Commander 1994,1997 Colt Officer ACPs 2001 Colt LTW Commander 2005 Colt Defender 2007 Dan Wesson
    early Detonics come visit http://www.americanclassic1911forum.com or www.bersachat.com

  12. #12
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    PA here - so no pieces of paper per gun! I have always however made it priority to have put any and every gun used for carry thru firstly - extensive reliability tests - followed by speed shooting and work from the leather. Some of this is increased thru IDPA as well.

    Regardless of our right via the 2nd - I do feel everyone should make a point of familiarization with their carry platform - such that they have competence, fluidity, and skill.

    The one thing that does give me cause for concern, is the individual who decides to carry - gets permit and buys a gun - only to then carry said piece never even having fired it!!! Those folks do exist - and I think they are foolish both to themselves and others.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  13. #13
    VIP Member Array Euclidean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,213
    P95, I certainly agree with your sentiment you should at least fire any gun you want to carry. But I will play the devil's advocate here.

    My mother has fairly bad arthritis. It's physically painful for her to fire a handgun, especially one with any kind of recoil. Now truthfully she is physically capable of doing it, but it hurts. She could probably fire 6 or 7 rounds in succession though without it hurting too bad. After that she'd have to stop and her hands would hurt for an hour.

    Furthermore she can't load a catridge into a magazine. She can push the cylinder release on a good revolver forward however. It also helps tremendously if the gun has an easy to manipulate hammer so it can be cocked into single action mode. I have plans to get her a Model 10 and have a gunsmith do a trigger job on it so the trigger will be smooth as possible.

    Should she be subjected to a state mandated torture test of having to fire 50 rounds in rapid succession?

    I'm an able bodied 23 year old male with no real health problems. It's reasonable to expect me to be able to deliver such a performance. My mother could not do it. It would hurt too much.

    It depresses me to think she can't get a permit.

    You have to let everyone have a basic right like this and people just need to figure it out for themselves.

  14. #14
    Distinguished Member Array Anubis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arapahoe County CO
    Posts
    1,799

    definition of "qualified"?

    If "qualified" means my score record witnessed and signed by someone else, then my answer is "no".

    There is no legal qualification requirement here--Colorado--for the CWP. One must have passed a firearm safety class including a legal briefing, but qualifying with any pistol is an option of the instructor. I qualified in the course with a Colt 1911A1 owned by the instructor, scoring 299 out of 300; this included blasting a silhouette target at 7, 15, and 25 feet.

    I carry either of 2 Glock 21s, and I frequently shoot a "qualification" perfect score at 25 feet with both of them. I have my own records of this, if it ever becomes an issue. Of course these records could be challenged as fake on cross-examination.

  15. #15
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Euc - good point and my statement was thusly rather too sweeping. Far be it for me to wish anyone disadvantaged and defenceless.

    In your mother's case and similar let me qualify my previous thoughts - I would not wish in any way for them to have to suffer a mandated full training - but would want that they be ''schooled'' by someone - in this case yourself. Exceptions need made but nonetheless, there is still a base level of competence needed I think.

    This would mean they could be totally familiar with the firearm's mechanics - essential still IMO - following which just enough live fire to know what to expect and be competent, without suffering!!

    Don't get me wrong - I would want your dear mother to be able to carry, that's a given - just hope that she can be brought up to a standard that in fact has HER feeling ''in charge'' - not having misgivings or worries that might decrease her chances were it ever needed. If you get my drift!
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. "Blue Force Gear" and "eCop! Police Supply" Review
    By Medic218 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 30th, 2012, 05:31 PM
  2. (Open carry) "Help, Officer, he brandished his weapon at me!"..."No i didn't!!"
    By RR9501 in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: October 9th, 2010, 01:48 PM
  3. 10% Rebate on "the-backup" for Denfensive Carry Members"
    By ajphusker1 in forum Sponsor Buy, Sell & Trade
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 19th, 2009, 05:32 PM
  4. A True Texas Tale: "Bad Guy" "One", "Old Man" "Zero"
    By Rock and Glock in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 17th, 2006, 08:50 AM
  5. My first "carry" out in the "World. . . "
    By madmike in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: February 27th, 2006, 01:34 PM

Search tags for this page

ccw mn do i have to qualify with each gun

,

concealed carry qualified 357 can carry 38

,

do i have to qualify with every firearms i carry concealed off-duty

,

tcleose handgun qualification do you have qualify with each gun you carry

Click on a term to search for related topics.