This is a discussion on OFCC & NRA Intervene in Cleveland v Ohio (Firearm Preemption) within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; From the Ohioans For Concealed Carry website: OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY AND NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION FILE MOTION TO INTERVENE IN CLEVELAND PREEMPTION LAWSUIT Cleveland, Ohio, ...
From the Ohioans For Concealed Carry website:
OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY AND NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION FILE MOTION TO INTERVENE IN CLEVELAND PREEMPTION LAWSUIT
Cleveland, Ohio, May 29 /USNewswire/ -- Ohioans For Concealed Carry (OFCC) and the National Rifle Association (NRA), today filed a motion in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas seeking to intervene in City of Cleveland v. State of Ohio, in which the City of Cleveland has challenged firearms preemption enacted by the Ohio legislature to clarify and ensure uniform application of gun laws throughout the state.
A temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting the city from enforcing its local gun laws in direct opposition to State and Federal laws was also sought from the court in Tuesday’s filing. Co-affiants who are members of either one or both organizations supported the motion to intervene as representatives of the NRA and OFCC, including city residents, Ohio residents, non-resident Ohioans, and residents of other states who travel to or through the City of Cleveland.
“Mayor Frank Jackson has thumbed his nose at the Ohio legislature’s attempt to bring uniformity and clarity to the possession, transfer, ownership, and carry of firearms by vowing to continue to enforce conflicting and vague city laws without a court order staying state law,” said Jeff Garvas, president of Ohioans For Concealed Carry. “We are asking the court to order Cleveland to stay the enforcement of its local gun laws and comply with Ohio law unless and until they succeed in their challenge to the state statute.”
“The State will defend its authority to pass preemption legislation while Cleveland will argue its authority to pass their own firearms legislation under Home Rule,” continued Garvas. “We are stepping in to represent the interests of all lawful gun owners who are or may be adversely affected by the continued enforcement of Cleveland’s conflicting ordinances.”
Since March 14th Ohio law has preempted all local municipalities from enacting firearms legislation other than zoning ordinances. Cleveland filed its lawsuit in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court the same day.
CONTACT: News media seeking comments should use the Contact Us form at the bottom of OhioCCW.org and choose "Media Spokesman" from the pull down list before completing the submission form.
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.
Learn how Project Appleseed Marksmanship and Heritage events support freedom.
I'm always amazed at the pointless dedication anti-gunners make to their cause. You can throw all the facts in the world at them and it is impossible to shake their belief that guns are somehow evil of themsleves. It's not like Cleveland doesn't have enough other stuff to worry about. It's not like there isn't a ton of evidence out there stating how most anti-gun areas are also high crime areas. What a waste of time. But who knows, maybe the politicians are just trying to throw some smoke and pass blame for their own failings on to the state. ("If the state would just stay out of our way we'd get things done!" Though all those things they try have failed again and again in the past.)
For those in Cleveland, I hope this injunction is approved and that the Cleveland vs State thing is cleared up quickly.
<a target="_top" href="http://www.cybernations.net/default.asp?Referrer=TonyW"><img src="http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd188/18932471/imgad2-1.png" border="0"></a>