Crimson Trace versus LaserMax

This is a discussion on Crimson Trace versus LaserMax within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I prefer CT grips for two reasons. One I am not a fan of the blinking, and two I like that there is no extra ...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 41 of 41

Thread: Crimson Trace versus LaserMax

  1. #31
    Member Array ShadeAngel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    384
    I prefer CT grips for two reasons.

    One I am not a fan of the blinking, and two I like that there is no extra manipulation of the weapon to get them to turn on. Simply grip it, and its on.
    "You can't shake the devils hand and say you were only kidding"

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #32
    Senior Member Array TonyW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    791
    Quote Originally Posted by peacefuljeffrey View Post
    I guess that must be an easy-to-overlook issue: does your laser device work correctly in conjunction with your holster.

    After all, any gun we're going to carry is going to be holstered, yes?
    I think that would probably vary with the gun and holster. I put the Airweight in my Milt Sparks holster (it's for a SP101 but the Airweight fit) and didn't seem to have that problem.
    <a target="_top" href="http://www.cybernations.net/default.asp?Referrer=TonyW"><img src="http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd188/18932471/imgad2-1.png" border="0"></a>

  4. #33
    Member
    Array garyacman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    copperas cove,tx
    Posts
    156

    Thumbs up

    I have CT on both my Glock's ie.G26/G39 and love them.Works fine in all my holsters.
    God Bless our troops,Pass the ammo
    carry guns,g30,g39
    1911,colt defender 90 / .45
    OLD F##T W/ .45:
    my avater is part of the reason i feel the way i do.

  5. #34
    Member Array My73LT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Orlando, Fla
    Posts
    35
    Count me in for CT's on my S+W .40 tactical. Love 'em. No issues, no fumbling. Just grip it and it's on, relax my ring finger, and it's off.
    Once you get it dialed in, it's dead on every time.

    Now, while I was having my CT's put on ( at a show, free install ), they were also installing an LM for another guy, and couldn't seem to make it work reliably. It would work fine for a few times, then not, then it would again. The guy was fairly annoyed. It could've been the gun, a bad LM unit, or the guy installing, but I was very under-whelmed. Right there, I decided I wouldn't consider a LM for ANY gun I owned. I didn't like substituting parts that came from the factory.

    Two things to consider about any laser :

    1- That laser works both ways in a smoky/foggy enviroment, the main reason I don't like constant on or rail mounted lasers ( that you have to activate separately ).
    2- Don't count on the laser. Practice with the iron sites. The day you count on it, is the day it will fail.

  6. #35
    me
    me is offline
    Senior Member Array me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Shanandoah Valley VA
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by zero View Post
    The CT prototype for the XD is on their website. Also seem to remember the LM website saying something about non pulse being new too. Hard to keep up with all the changes, and who knows how prototypes work out/
    I stand corrected about the CT. I am surprised to hear LM is going to a solid beam since their selling point is the blinking laser. Yeah these new prototypes are hard to keep up with.
    Mark

    "The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose."

    -James Earl Jones

  7. #36
    Member Array Mike from Texas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    D/FW Texas
    Posts
    152
    I have the CT grips on my Ultra Carry and honestly, the jury is still out to me as to whether they are a good thing or bad thing. I can certainly see the advantage to them but I can also see where they can create bad shooting habits in regards to sight aquisition and placement. When at the range, I usually try to shoot 2 or 3 mags with the laser and after the 3rd mag I catch myself looking over the sights to see the laser. I could see where it *might* cause bad habits if you shoot them a lot. That's why I practice with my sights more than the laser. I know unless something *REALLY* bad goes down that my sights will always work.
    Kimber Ultra Carry - CT Lasergrips
    Glock 19, 21SF, 29
    KelTec P3AT
    Built M4 Carbine - My Evil Black Rifle
    ********************************

  8. #37
    New Member Array nightforce53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6
    I have a crimson on my sig-sauer p-239 and on my kimber ultra carry
    and I like em.
    nightforce53

  9. #38
    Member Array Skye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    96

    Great for practice!

    I've had a CT on my Commander for several years now and no problems encountered.

    I have noted that in bright daylight the tiny dot cannot be seen beyond about 25 feet.

    I've also noted that in daylight, I don't even look for the dot but just use the trusty iron sights.

    What I've done for a long time now, is when I get home and park the vehicle in the garage, I try a draw and point shoot at something (not really shoot but draw and say "bang") and then look at where the dot is.

    Two conclusions here - Point shooting at close range really has something to say for it. And, the CT dot lets you know where you would have hit right away.

    ...Skye...

  10. #39
    Senior Member Array zero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by Skye View Post
    I've had a CT on my Commander for several years now and no problems encountered.

    I have noted that in bright daylight the tiny dot cannot be seen beyond about 25 feet.

    I've also noted that in daylight, I don't even look for the dot but just use the trusty iron sights.

    What I've done for a long time now, is when I get home and park the vehicle in the garage, I try a draw and point shoot at something (not really shoot but draw and say "bang") and then look at where the dot is.

    Two conclusions here - Point shooting at close range really has something to say for it. And, the CT dot lets you know where you would have hit right away.

    ...Skye...
    The whole idea/desire for the little red dot (especially on my J frame) is for point shooting like you described. Thanks for your input.

  11. #40
    New Member Array markand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    3
    I've had CT laser grips on my SIG P229 for some time and more recently my P220. No complaints at all. I chose the CT product over the LaserMax mostly because I was about to, or already had, replaced the factory grips with rubberized grips anyway. Activating the laser upon presentation seemed more natural as well. No problem with holster or body interference with the switch. Bright even in daylight, in my experience. I devote some range time to practice with the normal sights, but my older eyes, bifocals, lack of dominant eye, etc. make that difficult. Putting the dot on the target and shooting is a great concept, despite disadvantages of the laser (giving away position, reliance on battery powered gizmo, etc.)

  12. #41
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,482
    I might mention one potential problem with the CT's - and it's not a failing so much as something to do with user proportions.

    I have CT's on all three of my SIG's (and love 'em!) ......... now with the 226 and 228 in particular, being double stackers, the grip circumference is quite large. Suits me fine and in fact the CT grip feel is even better than factory grips.

    However - one or two folks who have tried these guns, and have smaller hands with shorter fingers, do find the strong hand middle finger pad does not quite make the pressure switch every time. Thus no 100&#37; reliable automatic turn-on every time.

    The 220 being single stack is slightly less of a problem with short fingers but - point is - folks with smaller hands need to bear this in mind, so as not to be disappointed.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Crimson Trace or Lasermax.
    By kimberhappy in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: April 5th, 2011, 10:47 AM
  2. Crimson Trace vs lasermax on Glock 26
    By wizardofgore in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: December 6th, 2008, 05:08 PM
  3. Crimson Trace LG-305 & 105
    By kentuckycarry in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: March 9th, 2008, 07:57 AM
  4. Lasermax or Crimson Trace?
    By Ace12 in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: August 17th, 2007, 09:27 AM
  5. G26 Lasermax vs. Crimson Trace?
    By js in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: August 20th, 2006, 05:33 PM

Search tags for this page

crimson trace j frame review

,
crimson trace versus lasermax
,

crimson trace vs lasermax

,
insight j frame laser
,

insight laser for j frame

,
insight laser j frame
,
lasermax in daylight
,

lasermax j frame review

,
lasermax j-frame review
,

lasermax vs crimson trace

,
lasermax vs crimson trace j frame
,
lasermax vs crimson trace reviews
Click on a term to search for related topics.