Vitter To Introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity: MERGED
This is a discussion on Vitter To Introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity: MERGED within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
Gun Owners of America
Wednesday, June ...
-
June 18th, 2008 05:16 PM
#1
Senior Member
Array
Vitter To Introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity: MERGED
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
Gun Owners of America
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is planning to introduce a concealed carry reciprocity bill next week.
Senator Vitter had been working closely with Gun Owners of America to draft and file a reciprocity amendment a few weeks ago, but that amendment, unfortunately, never saw the light of day -- thanks to powerful opponents inside the Senate.
However, Sen. Vitter has continued undaunted and last week sent a Dear Colleague letter to his fellow senators, asking them to cosponsor his forthcoming bill, the "Respecting States Rights and Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act."
The Vitter bill treats concealed carry permits much the same as drivers' licenses, where one state's license is recognized in all other states.
In addressing the matter of reciprocity, the first concern of GOA and Sen. Vitter is that it be done constitutionally and that it respects states' rights.
Unlike another senate reciprocity measure, S. 388, Vitter's bill does not establish "national standards" for concealed carry. It simply says that states that allow concealed carry must recognize the CCW permits of other states.
Vitter's bill also respects the rights of states that allow concealed carry without a permit. Citizens of Vermont and non-license holders in Alaska are allowed to carry concealed without a permit. Under the Vitter bill, these states would be recognized in the same manner as states that do issue permits.
States that do not allow concealed carry at all are not forced, under the Vitter bill, to recognize out-of-state permits. There are currently two such states, Illinois and Wisconsin. While it is deplorable that these states refuse to trust their citizens with firearms, this is an issue that has to be dealt with at the state level.
Citizens should not be forced to sacrifice their right to self-defense at the state line. The Vitter bill will allow more Americans to defend themselves away from their home state.
Action: Please urge your two Senators to become original cosponsors of the Vitter "Respecting States Rights and Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act." You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at GOA Legislative Action Center to send your Senators the pre-written e-mail message
-
June 18th, 2008 05:16 PM
Remove Ads
-
June 18th, 2008 05:19 PM
#2
Senior Member
Array
I completely understand the viewpoint of those who want ABOLUTELY NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT in CCW permits at all. I really do. It should not be a concern of the federal government and the G can screw up anything they touch! Believe me, I know. 
That being said, this level of involvement seems to be a postive thing. I personally think this would be a good thing for permit holders. I know there will be those who disagree, and I understand where they are coming from, but I think this is a good move. Not perfect, but better.
Gonzo
-
June 18th, 2008 06:13 PM
#3
New Member
Array
A great step in the right direction......may be hope for us, after all....this is amazing, someone in government, that has common sense.....
Basic rights and freedoms are not granted by the government in exchange for good behavior. They are by ours right, God given and unalienable, which means that no government may take them away, for any reason, under any circumstance..
David Horowitz
-
June 18th, 2008 06:37 PM
#4
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
TheGreatGonzo
I completely understand the viewpoint of those who want ABOLUTELY NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT in CCW permits at all. I really do. It should not be a concern of the federal government and the G can screw up anything they touch! Believe me, I know.
That being said, this level of involvement seems to be a postive thing. I personally think this would be a good thing for permit holders. I know there will be those who disagree, and I understand where they are coming from, but I think this is a good move. Not perfect, but better.
Gonzo
I agree, I'd like the Feds out of as much as possible,but this is what I think is the 2nd Amendment(Federal Law). I don't think this passes though..........
"The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree..."
Nunn v. State GA 1848
-
June 18th, 2008 07:15 PM
#5
Member
Array
Absolutely has to be decided federally, and carved in stone once and for all. The Supreme court is about to ruminate on the 2nd shortly if I am correct. God grant them wisdom, and the ability to read and understand our language...
-
June 19th, 2008 09:13 AM
#6
Member
Array
Reciprocity among other states.....
Vitter To Introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
Gun Owners of America
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is planning to introduce a concealed carry
reciprocity bill next week.
Senator Vitter had been working closely with Gun Owners of America to draft
and file a reciprocity amendment a few weeks ago, but that amendment,
unfortunately, never saw the light of day -- thanks to powerful opponents
inside the Senate.
However, Sen. Vitter has continued undaunted and last week sent a Dear
Colleague letter to his fellow senators, asking them to cosponsor his
forthcoming bill, the "Respecting States Rights and Concealed Carry
Reciprocity Act."
The Vitter bill treats concealed carry permits much the same as drivers'
licenses, where one state's license is recognized in all other states.
In addressing the matter of reciprocity, the first concern of GOA and Sen.
Vitter is that it be done constitutionally and that it respects states'
rights.
Unlike another senate reciprocity measure, S. 388, Vitter's bill does not
establish "national standards" for concealed carry. It simply
says that
states that allow concealed carry must recognize the CCW permits of other
states.
Vitter's bill also respects the rights of states that allow concealed carry
without a permit. Citizens of Vermont and non-license holders in Alaska are
allowed to carry concealed without a permit. Under the Vitter bill, these
states would be recognized in the same manner as states that do issue
permits.
States that do not allow concealed carry at all are not forced, under the
Vitter bill, to recognize out-of-state permits. There are currently two such
states, Illinois and Wisconsin. While it is deplorable that these states
refuse to trust their citizens with firearms, this is an issue that has to
be dealt with at the state level.
Citizens should not be forced to sacrifice their right to self-defense at
the state line. The Vitter bill will allow more Americans to defend
themselves away from their home state.
Action: Please urge your two Senators to become original cosponsors of the
Vitter "Respecting States Rights and Concealed Carry Reciprocity
Act." You
can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
GOA Legislative Action Center to send your Senators the pre-written
e-mail message below.
----- Prewritten letter -----
Dear Senator,
Senator David Vitter is planning to introduce a concealed carry reciprocity
bill next week.
The bill, the "Respecting States Rights and Concealed Carry Reciprocity
Act," will allow citizens who are permitted to carry concealed in
their home
state, to carry in all states that allow concealed carry.
This bill does not establish national concealed carry standards, but takes a
sound constitutional approach that respects states' rights.
I urge you to contact Senator Vitter and become an original cosponsor of
this legislation.
Sincerely,
-
June 19th, 2008 11:22 AM
#7
Member
Array
Sent notes to both my senators.
-
June 19th, 2008 01:18 PM
#8
Member
Array
If you're looking for action on this don't hold your breath. This has been introduced every session for the past um-teen years. It never goes anywhere; kind of like the AWB being reintroduced every session since it expired.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
-
June 19th, 2008 01:32 PM
#9
Member
Array
I sent e-mail to my two Senators. Hopefully this gains some traction!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By samh in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 57
Last Post: September 24th, 2011, 03:22 PM
-
By mrreynolds in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 17
Last Post: July 22nd, 2009, 08:27 AM
-
By GizmoHD in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 11
Last Post: May 8th, 2009, 10:36 AM
-
By mrreynolds in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 18
Last Post: December 8th, 2008, 10:03 PM
-
By ArmedAviator in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 2
Last Post: April 16th, 2008, 11:25 AM
Search tags for this page
senator vitter concealed carry