21 Feet Is Way Too Close
This is a discussion on 21 Feet Is Way Too Close within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by rstickle
The sad part is I can almost hear the lawyer now, "and then you shot him in the back (side)?"
November 7th, 2005 03:12 PM
I know what you mean. But you only have to shoot him as you perceive the need. The point of the step and pivot is to gain time and distance and from what I have seen, even if he recovers rapidly, you are at some distance from him, he's got to change directions, and this time, your recognition, draw and fire time are non factors because you've already responded, and your gun out, if he turns to charge again, you could put five rounds in him by the time he gets back up to speed.
Originally Posted by rstickle
November 7th, 2005 03:12 PM
November 7th, 2005 03:17 PM
Interesting observation from a LEO:
In the verbal stage, addressing the potential BG, and instructing them along the lines of, "Hey, buddy, wait right there.", and holding up the "Stop" hand, and assessing your situation. If the BG does not appropriately respond, be more "forceful" in your address, and begin the arc. In otherwords, begin stepping off-line and lateral, as the exchange continues. This allows you to choose ground, require the BG to move, and allows you to scan the surroundings(more BG's, maybe?). His observation (and mine, when I played with it a bit), was that it makes it much harder for the BG to finalize an approach and when he does, you're in a better position to respond.
November 7th, 2005 03:27 PM
The way I have always taught the 21' rule is simply that distance, or less, is the distance that a self defense shooting typically occurs. Most police shootings are 10' or less. Given that, you won't have much time to draw and shoot, especially if you are caught completely unaware. Situational awareness and avoidance techniques can save your life. Within 21', by the time your brain registers that you are being attacked, it's probably too late unless you have your gun in your hand.
While this is not a "law" as such remember that if you were to shoot an attacker at say 50' you would be hard pressed to convince a court of law that you were in immediate danger and couldn't at least try to run away, which is required in most states.
DEMOCRACY IS TWO WOLVES AND A LAMB VOTING ON WHAT TO HAVE FOR LUNCH. LIBERTY IS A WELL ARMED LAMB CONtestING THE VOTE.
Certified Instructor for Minnesota Carry Permit
NRA Pistol and Personal Protection Insrtuctor
Utah Permit Certified Instructor
November 7th, 2005 04:07 PM
DING DING DING...we have a winner folks...
Originally Posted by havegunjoe
Exactly...unless you know its happening you wont have your hand ON your gun...close range hand to hand techniques are needed...avoidance and repositioning training IS needed. Force on Force with airsoft guns can teach/train so much on this and really open your eyes...under 5 feet your gonna have problems accessing the pistol and beeing effective with it. Not that you cant getit out and do a rock type retention fire. It can be done and almost every situation can be different.
You MUST move offline period!!! If you dont move you will be shot/stabbed/beaten/etc. YOu have to disruot the BG's thought loop...(OODA). Its provable with FOF drills.
Start doing what ifs out in public...when you are within arms reach of others...you will see how difficult it can be to survive under that 21 feet...
Be aware....be proactive...be aggressive....
November 7th, 2005 09:03 PM
I also read 10 seconds.
Thanks for the post. I actually copied the info onto a microsoft doc in case....God forbid I ever need it to defend my actions.
November 8th, 2005 03:08 PM
Ah. Cool. I had to scroll through the posts awhile to find it, but I KNEW SOMEONE would mention the Teuller Drill. We actually did the drill during LFI-I. Bottom line was that we had 14 guys, the largest of whom was 320 pounds and 6'9" tall and had bad knees, and he STILL covered the distance in about 3 seconds. Very sobering.
Originally Posted by CombatEffective
CE - I have heard folks screw it up too and consider the "21-foot rule" some sort of legal principle, which it is certainly not. Instead (as I know you are aware - just reinterating here for all of us to consider), understanding how fast a bad guy can get to you with a contact weapon can go to establishing reasonableness of your defensive actions. But, of course, from a legal standpoint it is always better not to go there in the first place if it can be avoided.
"You may not know it, but there's things that gnaw at a man worse than dyin'."
Charles Travis Postlewaite, 1882
November 8th, 2005 04:58 PM
I got a CCW while in Iowa, the course was taught by a sheriffs deputy, he said in Iowa (and a few other states) the "21' rule" IS a rule set through court action (I think). Basically he said if threatened by a stabbing, slashing, bludgeoning or crushing weapon at 21 feet or less you were automatically justified in shooting, no questions asked, greater than 21 feet you would have to prove your justification. He then said " If threatened and you are not sure if the distance is 21' here is the proper shooting stance" He assumed the Weaver stance, making like he was firing and saying BANG, BANG, BANG while walking forward.
In Indiana it is also recognized that if confronted by 3 or more individuals “a reasonable and prudent man has cause to fear he is in imminent danger of grievous bodily injury or death” and application of deadly force is justified, as well as shooting through the door if someone is attempting to break in. Here in Misery self defense is always an affirmative defense, you have to raise it and prove you were “reasonably in fear of bodily injury or death” and if the prosecutor doesn’t think your fear was reasonable…..well you are up to your eyeballs in it.
There is already the start of a movement for a castle doctrine law like Florida’s to be introduced in the next legislature, with both houses and the Governors mansion in the hands of Republicans, we might have a chance.
December 28th, 2005 06:58 PM
That method was taught to me also while in Physical Security Training at Lackland AFB. Except that you keep scoring hits with your weapon as long as possible/as close as possible
Originally Posted by rocky
December 28th, 2005 07:39 PM
I thought this was cool and VERY eye opening. All reading says 21 feet is THE distance a person can cover before you can draw and shoot. What about YOUR safe zone?
Face a target at 7 yds.
Have a buddy stand behind you facing the other direction.
When the timer goes off or someone says GO, he starts running away from you....
You draw and fire on the target as fast as it takes you to hit CM.
When the buddy hears the shot he will stop.
You turn around and see how far he ran away from you.
The distance is YOUR SAFE ZONE.
December 28th, 2005 07:59 PM
hph, yeah, that is effectively the ''Tueller drill".
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
- a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
December 28th, 2005 08:18 PM
yes when they Taught our CCW class the Cop teaching it said the Tueller Drill was good but 21 feet was BS
They took The fastest shooters in call and marked off 21 feet behing us we were on the actuall range and said when he lifts his hand up and shoot twice as fast as you can get hits
Most people were at 27 feet for 2 shots i was faster and they told the class there is always someone who can beat the drill but as shown 15 out of 16 couldnt
i got 2 off at 17feet from my Hk 45 That was cocked and locked
At DAO first shot i was 20 foot for 2 hits
December 28th, 2005 10:00 PM
hph, yeah, that is effectively the ''Tueller drill"
I guess I'm right when say that 3 to 5 seconds to get that pistol clear from its location down in the family jewels might as well be an eternity for some defensive scenarios.
December 28th, 2005 10:05 PM
i dont dig the ideal of carrying my Tool next to my other Tool
espically in the Tueller Drill
December 28th, 2005 10:18 PM
1952 - 2006
An Excellent Article
I found this article on the net and thought it worth sharing in the thread.
The Reality Of Edged Weapon Attacks
By By Lloyd De Jongh
I live in South Africa; here knives are commonly used on our streets. Knives are seen as a thug’s weapon, and unfortunately our culture has developed an unusual, sophisticated criminal knife method. Blade-to-blade combat, or facing a knife unarmed, is a reality here. We have learned both to fear and respect the blade because of this.
This article addresses aspects of the very real threat of the blade by examining what we (whether civilians or law enforcement personnel) really face, and the training methods designed to counter it. Hopefully this will benefit your own research and practice.
To best counter an enemy, study him. Know his methods and know why he does what he does. Thus, we learn from those who use blades in their culture, and study the kinds of people that are considered a threat. Then, take those methods apart and learn to respect them. The people who would harm others know only too well how to speak with a knife. Think like a violent, criminal individual.
When you do this you will see that violent people are rarely there to ‘fight’ on equal terms, they are there to win. Their use of a weapon is to give them, quite literally, the edge.
The Dual Fantasy
We, as the potential victims of criminals, have a peculiar idea of a knife ‘fight’ based on the assumption we will be given warning of an impending knife attack, and allowed time and room to prepare. We have a mistaken expectation of a duel. Question: Why would I carry a small, easily-concealed weapon with a very limited range and then reveal it so that you can find an equalizer?
In prison the knife is an assassin's weapon and victims are taken by surprise. Wardens who are assaulted are attacked without warning, with no chance of meeting the assault on equal terms. Policemen who are knifed have fractions of a second to respond, as the weapon is employed at very short range as a surprise attack. People who are mugged with knives usually don't see it coming until way too late. If you still imagine that these scenarios are duels then your wheel's spinning, but your hamster's dead.
There are knifings, there are stabbings, there are threats made with knives, and there is armed robbery. I have seen people trying to kill each other, but I have yet to see people fight an extended duel with a blade. Combat with knives is not the equivalent of a fist fight. In my experience blade-to-blade scenarios involved warring gangs in close-in lethal combat; drunken or otherwise highly emotional individuals in an argument that escalated into physical violence; or assaults in neighbourhoods where residents expect to be accosted with a knife and habitually carry their own. Such duels were brutal, violent and very short. I have yet to see scenes like these at the movies, or in knife training classes.
Criminals and others who have experienced knife assaults respond in two ways. Either they get a better weapon with a greater range, or they just run from a potential assault. If they don't want to go toe-to-toe on an equal basis with a determined knife-wielding attacker, why would you think about it?
The Fantasy of Empty Hand Defence
Since we know that a knife can provide a massive advantage psychologically and tactically (and is employed for these very reasons), let us examine another potential fantasy in our knife training: going it empty hand. Empty hand against a blade is not your first option because it is potential suicide. You see, you don't “fight” an armed attacker, you SURVIVE the assault.
Why then do exponents of various knife systems speak of how lethal or disabling knives are, and then go on to say one should "expect to get cut"? Somehow this makes a committed assault with a legally recognized deadly weapon seem a minor inconvenience when used by the bad guy. An assailant uses a weapon to minimize his risk by removing your options, allowing him to overwhelm and dominate. If you play his game you will be more than inconvenienced.
To quote a brilliant observation by self-defense expert Marc Mac Young: “self defense is not about fighting, it’s about not being hurt by physical violence”. If you must get cut, do so on your terms. Unarmed, you do not trade blows with a knifer. Only trade a cut for a kill.
The Fantasy Of Protection By A Handgun
Ownership of a handgun does not guarantee immunity from a knifer, and Law Enforcement Personnel have their own unique set of concerns – which we’ll bring into the picture from this point on. But many of the same principles apply to any owner of a handgun.
An edged weapon does not guarantee a quick kill. Neither do bullets. Often there is no time to draw; very often this is by design. It is well documented that bullets often fail immediately to stop a motivated attacker. Law enforcement officers thus need control tactics to deal with someone at close range so that injuries sustained from bullets can take their toll, or to create an opportunity to draw and bring a weapon to bear.
Prison warders have perhaps a greater awareness of the dangers of edged weapons due to the fact that they are unarmed when they go about their duties, relying on instinct, natural weapons and the use of their environment. Armed officers however, may have an unrealistic, perhaps false, sense of security
There is a saying “Don’t bring a gun to a knife fight.” Here is the reason. The Tueller Drill (named for Sgt. Dennis Tueller of the Salt Lake City Police) demonstrated that the concept of draw and fire on a target at 7 yards (6.5m or 21ft) was not decisive, but resulted in a tie when the aggressor charged the shooter. An average time of 1.5 seconds was calculated for an aggressor to cover a distance of 21 (6.4m) feet.
In local experiments it has been shown that 7 metres can be covered in just over 7/10ths of a second, and an expert draw time was calculated at 1.3 seconds. If you are taken by surprise by a knife wielding assailant, or the assailant takes evasive action, you are almost sure to lose the confrontation should you rely solely on your firearm.
Sgt. Tueller concluded that someone with a knife or club at a distance of 21 feet or less was a potentially lethal threat. (Note that Jeff Cooper at GunSite teaches a drill time of 1.5 seconds for drawing a handgun and firing two aimed shots)
To illustrate the seriousness with which this threat is viewed, the "Tueller drill" is now a standard part of Massad Ayoob's Lethal Force Institute classes (nationally known for arms training programs for law enforcement).
Facing An Armed & Motivated Aggressor
Let us assume that we are facing a highly motivated, determined and goal-oriented aggressor.
What we need then to follow up on this new awareness is to be at least as motivated and goal oriented in our tactics to confront violent aggressors who wish to attack us with knives, clubs, machetes, bricks etc.
The aggressor has a goal: use violence to neutralize you as a threat and to achieve their aims.
To follow up on our awareness of the threat we need to have equal or greater intent than who we face, and make use of sound goal-oriented tactics to deal with them when we are attacked with knives, razors, machetes and clubs. Why? Well, those are the tools used successfully by those who regularly use violence. With that in mind, your goal should be to survive the assault and stop your assailant.
The horrific events of September 11th 2001 brought home to us all the reality of how effective even a small bladed weapon is in the hands of a determined man. It also taught us how only equally committed action will allow us to prevail against this kind of threat when we cannot retreat.
Potentially Threatening Situations
Since police officers carry weapons and face dangerous people and situations on a regular basis, it makes sense to examine some of the scenarios they have faced.
• One might have to face multiple opponents, one or more armed with knives.
• We might not be able to reach our firearm, or not immediately.
• You have shot an assailant, but he is still attacking. (In one incident in Cape Town, three police officers shot a knife-wielding man who had randomly assaulted people 12 times with a police issue weapon. He still assaulted two of them and ran a fair distance in an attempt to escape before collapsing.)
• You have slipped and fallen, or were knocked down.
• Your attacker has two knives.
• Only after you have been struck do you notice blood and realise you have been cut.
These incidents are based on actual events. Speak to those who deal daily with violence, and you will hear worse examples.
There have been situations where guns have been emptied into an on-rushing assailant who still managed to kill the shooter, with both dying. In police work this is not an acceptable result.
Too often, training fails to take into account the emotional impact of surprise on performance, such as shock, hesitation, fear and doubt. It also often fails to address the real-life issues of poor lighting, wind, rain, restrictive clothing, crowds and slippery surfaces. Firearm competence alone is thus insufficient.
Adding Strikes To Handgun Retention Tactics
Defensive tactics emphasizing handgun retention skills and close-in evasion and escape to create distance for a draw are necessary. In South Africa, I believe that 4 out of 5 handgun owners are shot with their own guns by assailants. That statistic begs the question why.
I believe that knowledge of striking tactics that do not utilize fist strikes is a requirement for handgun users. Studies done at the excellent Modern Warrior facility have shown that the most common injury due to fist strikes is to the last two knuckles of the hand, and strong hand injuries are the most common arrest-related injury - due to these fisted strikes. Officers who were asked if they could get a solid grip on their weapons after the injury most often said no.
For this and other reasons, the Modern Warrior Defensive Tactics Institute has removed fist strikes from their Police Defensive Tactics curriculum and has replaced them with palm strikes and other open handed alternatives. Palm strikes have been proven to produce the fewest number of injuries when used by police. A fracture will take almost 2 months to heal, while a torn ligament (sprain) can take up to 6 months.
Training For The Real World
Is the training environment dynamic, chaotic and unorthodox? When training for life and death and learning the risks and limitations of using or reaching for a handgun when being taken by surprise or rushed by a knife-wielder, we need to simulate as much stress, confusion and shock as possible to acclimatize to the realities we face.
Does your training teach you to be aggressive? Learn to project all of your energies: voice, gaze and body language as a clear signal. Life and death struggles are no time for timidity.
Since we are dealing with the risks attached to facing a bladed weapon, which necessitates that the aggressor is very close, learn to treat any striking movement as if a knife was coming at you. Don’t find out after the ‘punch’ withdraws that you have been cut.
Protect yourself from harm with your awareness and your own offense. Turn the tables by putting the assailant on the back foot. Use the same game plan and strategies he uses because people who are ‘professionally’ violent know that in these situations those methods work.
The initial stab or cut is usually not fatal or disabling; it simply opens the way for further aggression that will finish you off. Do not allow an opportunity for his momentum to build; you keep fighting no matter what.
Since the chaos of violence is by its nature unpredictable, and thus hard to prepare for, let’s bear a few things in mind:
• Adjust your response when it isn’t working. Have a positive, aggressive, winning mind-set. Believe you can prevail. Learn to deal with surprise and shock and keep going.
• Question and experiment, learn the fact that there is no perfect defense. However, there are attributes that make you far more likely to succeed.
• Learn to react to sudden aggressive arm movement appropriately. Stay close, jam and neutralize; evade and escape; or evade and find/produce a weapon of your own.
Know that an attacker at 21 feet (6.4m) can be a lethal threat, even if you are armed with a gun, and even if they “only” have a knife. Hone your knowledge and awareness. And remember this in a potential life and death struggle. Offense wins fights. Defense keeps you fighting to allow your offense a chance to work.
About the Author:
Lloyd De Jongh has been in the martial arts for 14 years and for five years he has studied and learned criminal methods – from surprise assaults, muggings, fighting methodology, weapons use and psychological tactics. His website is: http://www.urbanshield.za.net
Heroes are people who do what has to be done, when it has to be done, regardless of the consequences
"I like when the enemy shoots at me; then I know where the ******** are and can kill them."
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
December 28th, 2005 10:20 PM
By Ally in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Last Post: January 4th, 2011, 09:52 PM
By LongRider in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: January 8th, 2010, 09:37 PM
By Sneaky in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Last Post: July 7th, 2009, 09:55 AM
By dizzysmurf03 in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
Last Post: November 18th, 2008, 09:36 PM
By SA-XD40 in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
Last Post: November 20th, 2006, 11:20 AM
Search tags for this page
21 feet is way too close
21 feet rule edged weapon training
21 feet to close
21 foot rule affirmative defense
concealed carry 21 feet law
introduce evidence of 21 foot rule police training
tueller drill defense carry
Click on a term to search for related topics.