Shooting legal Fees

This is a discussion on Shooting legal Fees within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Since this seems to always be a hot topic, does anyone have specific knowledge of someone being involved in a justified shooting going through the ...

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 72

Thread: Shooting legal Fees

  1. #1
    Member Array philman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Centerville, Ohio
    Posts
    190

    Shooting legal Fees

    Since this seems to always be a hot topic, does anyone have specific knowledge of someone being involved in a justified shooting going through the entire event with no legal fees, regardless of what the State says your civil liability is?

    It seems a lot of folks say that if your State states your are not liable for injuries to someone committing a crime, then you have zero worries in a shooting. Since the State of Ohio just changed that law, I am of the belief that regardless what Ohio says, I will incur legal fees to prove that I fall under the State law. Not being a lawyer, I ultimately have no idea, just wondered if anyone had more than a personal opinion.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Member Array MRPOWER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    51
    good question, im curious as well
    when I leave this Earth, It's gonna be on both feet; NEVER KNEES IN THE DIRT

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array sass20485's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    2,093
    Maybe no criminal charges, BUT there is always the possible civil suit brought against you by the person you shot or their family. As I understand it the Supreme court said the state does not have the authority to deprive someone their day in court.

  5. #4
    New Member Array gdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    4

    South Carolina

    A person who lawfully uses deadly force is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action, unless the person against whom deadly force was used is a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his official duties and he identifies himself in accordance with applicable law or the person using deadly force knows or reasonably should have known the person is a law enforcement officer.

    Ed

  6. #5
    Member Array philman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Centerville, Ohio
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by gdog View Post
    A person who lawfully uses deadly force is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action, unless the person against whom deadly force was used is a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his official duties and he identifies himself in accordance with applicable law or the person using deadly force knows or reasonably should have known the person is a law enforcement officer.

    Ed
    Again, Ohio says the same thing, want to know of anyone who applied it at zero cost to themselves.

    Example: I have always been taught:

    1: Shoot someone in a defensive situation

    2: Tell the Police you understand their need for a statement from you, but you need to see a lawyer first.

    3: I am not aware of free lawyers.

  7. #6
    Senior Member Array Shizzlemah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    723
    there are no free lawyers.

    if you have any assests (such as a house or even a car) you will not be able to get a public defender.

    If you want the zero dollar approach, you better have one IRONCLAD case, like an escaped pedophile and killer just hijacked a busload of nuns and orphans - because you'll be representing yourself in criminal proceedings. Hiring a lawyer is really the sane approach.

    Civil proceedings - well some states cap amounts for wrongful death. If you are civilly liable, Maine has a $100k cap on it. So, worst case, no lawyer and you just write the $100k check.... Note that typically there are no caps on "impaired function", so someone with a limp or in a wheelchair forever could be millions....

  8. #7
    Member Array calmp9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by Shizzlemah View Post
    there are no free lawyers.

    if you have any assests (such as a house or even a car) you will not be able to get a public defender.

    If you want the zero dollar approach, you better have one IRONCLAD case, like an escaped pedophile and killer just hijacked a busload of nuns and orphans - because you'll be representing yourself in criminal proceedings. Hiring a lawyer is really the sane approach.

    Civil proceedings - well some states cap amounts for wrongful death. If you are civilly liable, Maine has a $100k cap on it. So, worst case, no lawyer and you just write the $100k check.... Note that typically there are no caps on "impaired function", so someone with a limp or in a wheelchair forever could be millions....
    True. If I were involved in a shooting, I would want the best legal counsel I could find. There is going to be a considerable expense. I don't have a California CCW, but if I were to shoot someone in self-defense in my home, I was told that a defense attorney could be in the tens of thousands. This is not a Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground state so anything can happen in court. Here, the criminals have more rights than the victims do. On top of that, they can sue you.

    My move is imminent, but years away. I can't wait to get out of here.
    "[A]rms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."

    - Thomas Paine, Thoughts On Defensive War, 1775

  9. #8
    bae
    bae is offline
    Member Array bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    San Juan Islands
    Posts
    257
    Let me turn it around: let's see some examples of law-abiding citizens who legitimately used a firearm for self-defense who then lost huge amounts of money on related civil cases.

    How often does it happen?

  10. #9
    Member Array philman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Centerville, Ohio
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by bae View Post
    Let me turn it around: let's see some examples of law-abiding citizens who legitimately used a firearm for self-defense who then lost huge amounts of money on related civil cases.

    How often does it happen?
    I'm game for either angle. Just need someone with true experience, not just all us Internet lawyers.
    Last edited by Scott; August 31st, 2008 at 12:42 PM. Reason: removed profanity work around.

  11. #10
    Member
    Array Cakewalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    292
    This is yet another thing that will (or should) go through your mind before you even present your weapon... "Do I have the money for a lawyer?"
    Keep emotionally active. Cater to your favorite neurosis.

  12. #11
    Distinguished Member Array JerryM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,967
    While I suspect that lawyer fees would be high, and a lawyer probably necessary, I would also like to have some actual cases.

    We often get spooked by the "what ifs" and "smart lawyers."

    Personally I am not concerned about it, because if I do use my gun it will be because I have good reason to believe I am in danger of death or great bodily harm. I will worry about the lawyers and cost after I live through the encounter.

    But I have seen figures that it might cost you $50,000 by the time it is over.

    Regards,
    Jerry

  13. #12
    Ron
    Ron is offline
    Distinguished Member Array Ron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West Linn, Oregon
    Posts
    1,628
    Quote Originally Posted by philman View Post
    I'm game for either angle. Just need someone with true experience, not just all us Internet lawyers.
    The shooting has to be justified or lawfull based upon whatever the legal standard may be in the particular state in order for the "Castle Doctrine" to immunize you from criminal and civil liability,and that is where the problem can arise.

    If the local prosecutor decides, for whatever reason(remember the Duke University lacrosse fiasco),that the shooting was not justified and decides to indict, then you are goingtowant competent legal representation which is going to be very costly.

    It is a serious mistake to assume that because the shooting was seemingly lawful that you are off the hook. Prosecutors may act against you for reasons that have little or nothing to do with the merits of the shooting(again see the Duke case).
    Last edited by Scott; August 31st, 2008 at 12:43 PM. Reason: removed quoted profanity workaround
    "It does not do to leave a dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him."

    J. R. R. Tolkien

  14. #13
    Member Array Rusty Bouquett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lake Wobegon
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by sass20485 View Post
    Maybe no criminal charges, BUT there is always the possible civil suit brought against you by the person you shot or their family. As I understand it the Supreme court said the state does not have the authority to deprive someone their day in court.
    Perhaps so but the state can limit the amount of the reward in a legitimate shooting.

  15. #14
    Member Array oldpoet451's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    My old Kentucky home!
    Posts
    44
    Arkansas.
    1995.
    Home invasion.
    1 assailant dead.
    1 wounded (5 to 15 in the state pen).
    5 months of legal worries.
    Justifiable Homicide.
    Civil case throw out. Castle Doctrine.
    $12,000 in legal fees to local lawyer and hunting pal.
    California & New York lawyers probably a hell of a lot more expensive.
    "Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." --Teddy Roosevelt

  16. #15
    Member Array CowboyKen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    384
    Here is one where it appears that the CCW holder had no costs other then some time to explain what happened to authorities:
    Victims Released; No Charges Filed Against Reno Man In Winnemucca Shootings / Northern Nevada, Reno, Lake Tahoe, News Now, Live Streaming Darren Mack Trial

    Victims Released; No Charges Filed Against Reno Man In Winnemucca Shootings Save Email Print


    Posted: 5:54 PM May 25, 2008
    Last Updated: 6:42 AM May 27, 2008

    13 comments


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A | A | A Two people injured during a shootout at a Winnemucca bar that left three others dead have been released from the hospital.

    Police say a 22-year-old woman and a 34-year-old man were released from the hospital Monday.

    Authorities continue to investigate the shootings that they believe may have been sparked by a simmering feud between several local families.

    Winnemucca Police Chief Bob Davidson says the violence erupted around 2:30 A.M. Sunday when a man entered the crowded Players Bar and Grill. He fatally shot two brothers, 20-year-old Jose Torres and his 19-year-old brother, Margarito. The shooter was later identified as 30 year old Ernesto Villagomez. All three were from Winnemucca.

    According to witnesses, Villagomez at some point stopped to reload his high-capacity handgun and began shooting again when he was shot and killed by another patron - a 48-year-old Reno man who had a valid concealed weapons permit.

    The Reno man was initially taken into custody as a person of interest, but later released after Humboldt County District Attorney Russell Smith determined the shooting was justifiable homicide.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Legal age in FL for shooting at the range without legal guardian
    By cmdrdredd in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 10th, 2010, 03:51 PM
  2. Starbucks shooting Norfolk, VA (prob. not a legal carrier)
    By paramedic70002 in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 16th, 2010, 10:16 PM
  3. CCW Insurance / Legal Fees
    By sig1860 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: July 8th, 2009, 07:55 PM
  4. After a self-defense shooting, where do you get legal help?
    By HowardCohodas in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: April 15th, 2008, 01:41 PM
  5. Legal aftermath of an NJ shooting...
    By Wheel-man in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: January 14th, 2007, 06:17 PM

Search tags for this page

average attorney fees shooting defend yourself
,
average cost of a justifiable shooting civil liabilities
,
average lawyers fees for a concealed carry holder taht pulls a gun
,
average legal fees for self defense shooting
,
examples of civil cases in concealed carry shootings
,

justified shooting costs

,
justified shooting lawyer fees
,
legal cost for officer involved shooting
,
legal cost of defensive shooting
,
legal fees shooting
,
legal shooting legal fees
,

self defense shooting legal fees

Click on a term to search for related topics.