Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law

Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law

This is a discussion on Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; i came across this site by accident when i checked on the weather in grand lakes st mary The Evening Leader - Representative attempting to ...

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law

  1. #1
    Member Array megatron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009

    Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law

    i came across this site by accident when i checked on the weather in grand lakes st mary

    The Evening Leader - Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law
    Megatron: Power flows to the one who knows how. Desire alone is not enough.

  2. #2
    Member Array jdivence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Northwest Ohio
    sounds good to me
    God invented cops so that firemen could have heroes too!

  3. #3
    New Member Array SigGuy4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Can you check the link to see if it is correct? When I went to the link it was just a blank page...

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array tns0038's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    blank page for me too.

  6. #5
    Member Array rcsnpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    NPR Florida

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array randy7601's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Ft Worth TX
    Works for me.

    The Evening Leader - Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law

    Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law
    Friday, 17 April 2009
    Managing Editor

    ST. MARYS — For the second time in two years, an area legislator is attempting to change the concealed and carry law via a new bill. State Rep. John Adams, R-Sidney, last week introduced House Bill 129 — a measure that seeks to change the current concealed and carry law. The proposal would not require residents who are legally allowed to carry, possess and purchase firearms to obtain a permit to do so. Other changes include stripping the stipulation requiring permit holders to carry the permit while carrying a firearms as well as informing approaching law enforcement officials that a person is carrying a concealed weapon.

    "I introduced this last year in the General Assembly and it only had one committee hearing," Adams said. "We made some changes to it."
    Adams said the most glaring change comes in the form of stripping the requirement of obtaining a permit to carry a concealed weapon. The change, Adams said, is aimed at protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens.

    "You still have to go through the training and keep the paper that says you went through the training," Adams said. "All it does is eliminate the licensing aspect, but it does allow you to choose to go through that process. It's a hybrid — you can do either."

    The bill, which Adams likened to the Alaska-style Carry, also repeals mandates for re-qualification. The proposal also would allow the weapons to be carried on college campuses.

    "Vermont has no licensing aspect whatsoever," Adams said.

    "The law-abiding citizen doesn't change from state to state. That's always been my main thrust on arguing these points — the law-abiding citizen."

    Adams said he believes law-abiding citizens should not be punished because of a fear of criminals. Instead, Adams said the law should protect the rights of the law-abiding citizens.

    "There shouldn't be any alarmism on this," Adams said. "A law-abiding citizen in Vermont is not required to be licensed and I think it is a fundamental right (to carry)."

    While the bill failed to clear committee hearings last year, Adams said he hopes the proposal makes it to the floor for a vote. However, the Sidney resident stopped short of making any predictions.

    "I look forward to the committee hearing process," Adams said. "We are guaranteed one hearing and you go from there. I find on both sides of the aisle that they do understand the law abiding citizen aspect of it. They are not criminals and shouldn't be treated as such."
    Auglaize County Sheriff Al Solomon said he agrees with the protection of law-abiding citizens' rights, but favors some type of oversight on the topic.

    Solomon said the current system, which implements background checks, has safeguards in place to reduce the chances of a disqualified person from obtaining a permit.

    "I think you have to have some regulations in place," Solomon said. "You still have to consider the safety of law enforcement officers who are making those traffic stops in are in other situations."

    St. Marys Police Chief Greg Foxhoven said he favors keeping the licensing aspect of the law as well as background checks. The measures, the police chief said, offer some safeguards for the public.

    "If it isn't broke don't fix it," Foxhoven said. "I support the idea there is training and there is a license. I think it's been working and there haven't been any issues, at least locally."
    - - - - -
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho Marx

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array DaRedneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    I like the way that guy thinks!!! I hope he can get it passed. The only thing I disagree with is not having to be upfront with LEO. I'd rather tell them upfront rather than let them find out on their own.
    "He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." - Leonardo da Vinci

  9. #8
    New Member Array bacula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Nobody prevents you from doing so.
    If you get stopped by LEO, you can tell him that you carry.
    IMHO, the new law would prevent all those cases, where the LEO writes you up, because you have not told him up front.
    In one case the officer asked for the drivers license and insurance, before my friend was able to tell him about the gun.

  10. #9
    Member Array theheater905's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    I dont know if missed something in the article. What happens to reciprosity with other states that require the permit to carry? How do you prove you have a permit with no paper and what happens if you are stopped by LE out of state?

  11. #10
    Senior Member Array jualdeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Waponi Woo
    Quote Originally Posted by theheater905 View Post
    I dont know if missed something in the article. What happens to reciprosity with other states that require the permit to carry? How do you prove you have a permit with no paper and what happens if you are stopped by LE out of state?
    The same thing that happens if you are from alaska or Vermont. f you want the reciprocity, then you have to get the CHL.
    Bend the knees, smooth is fast, watch the front sight.

  12. #11
    Member Array HKkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Hmm...interesting article...

    HK USP Tactical 45
    HK P2000SK .40, LEM, Night Sights

  13. #12
    Senior Member Array wjh2657's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Lafayette, Tennessee
    Ohio will lose reciprocity if the bill passes. Other states will require some proof of process (permit/license) to allow them to carry within their state. It sounds good, but I can see where it will go astray if a Buckeye travels anywhere else with a weapon and no HCP/HCL. This wouldn't fly under the proposed Federal Law either as it requires full certification (HCP/HCL) from your mother state to allow carrying in another state.

    It will be like not requiring a drivers license. Go driving in a state that does require a license and you will end up with your keister in the clink and your car impounded. You can yell all you want, but you fall under their laws when you cross the state line!
    Retired Marine, Retired School Teacher, Independent voter, Goldwater Conservative.

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array paramedic70002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Franklin, VA
    My reply to that newspaper article:


    Regarding the article "Representative attempting to alter Ohio firearm law" on April 17:

    Does Sheriff Solomon really believe that requiring a background check for a permit will make criminals (they are the ones that break the law, in case I'm moving too fast here) not carry illegal weapons?

    And Chief Foxhoven thinks it's OK to continue taxing citizens for the 'privilege' to carry concealed in these tough economic times! He should have been invited to the tea party.

    It certainly sounds like law enforcement leadership is in need of a house cleaning.
    "Each worker carried his sword strapped to his side." Nehemiah 4:18

    Guns Save Lives. Paramedics Save Lives. But...
    Paramedics With Guns Scare People!

  15. #14
    Senior Member Array MR D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    South Central PA

    He does work for me - I voted for him...

    he is a great American, former Navy S.E.A.L., small business owner and God fearing family man...

    When he runs for re-election I'll vote for him again

  16. #15
    Member Array cobrar97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Marion, Ohio
    I don't know...I don't see the law taking away the license procedure ever. And truely, I don't mind the license. You have to take the class anyhow, why not just get the license. The wait time is what sucks, because you know they could turn those license around in a day if they wanted too...just like a driver's license.

    Now getting rid of the renewal license makes sense to me, or at least making it easy to renew...just like a driver's license. You should just be able to renew online and be done with it. But just getting rid of renewal would be best.

    And I don't mind telling a LEO I'm carrying if the need arises. It's just a professional courtsey that allows the LEO to be at ease for one of the 20 traffic stops he makes each day. There's nothing wrong with that. Most of them appreciate a CC holder.

    I think they should add something in about being able to carry in a resturant (bar excluded) that serves alcohol. Most fancy places serve some sort of alcohol, yet most people are not drinking like it's Friday night. I hate having to leave my firearm in the car when I go to Pizza Hut.

    I just wish the guy promoting this bill would tone it down a little. Try and get smaller pieces of the pie to go through instead of so many changes at one time. But then again...I know little about how politics work.

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Do you alter your patterns for BG?
    By Gunstogo in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:35 PM
  2. Castle Doctrine with Alter Ego Principle
    By FN1910 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: January 3rd, 2008, 06:37 PM
  3. Akron, Ohio CHL holder uses firearm to defend himself
    By buckeye .45 in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: June 6th, 2007, 05:12 AM
  4. OFCC & NRA Intervene in Cleveland v Ohio (Firearm Preemption)
    By MeanStreaker in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 30th, 2007, 07:32 AM
  5. Pro-Gun Ohio Representative Stung By Article In The Enquirer
    By Angio333 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 31st, 2006, 08:48 AM

Search tags for this page

altering a firearm ohio


ohio hcl for concealed carry

Click on a term to search for related topics.