Intervention Rule? - Page 2

Intervention Rule?

This is a discussion on Intervention Rule? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I voted #2. Circumstances vary so it's hard to say what I would do in every case but I hope I would try to help ...

View Poll Results: Intervention Rule?

378. You may not vote on this poll
  • Absolute "For me and mine, ONLY!"

    12 3.17%
  • I'll NOT stand idly by.

    66 17.46%
  • Primarily "for me and mine," but may intervene under certain conditions.

    275 72.75%
  • I don't honestly know.

    25 6.61%
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 111

Thread: Intervention Rule?

  1. #16
    VIP Member Array havegunjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    I voted #2. Circumstances vary so it's hard to say what I would do in every case but I hope I would try to help my fellow man or woman should they be in a life threatening situation.

    I don't know if you all remember the abduction and killing of Katie Pourier(sp) a few years ago here in Minnesota. She was working alone in a convience store when she was abducted. I have a daughter about her age and I think if I was there that night she would be alive today. No matter how much the lawyers scare us I would not let this happen. I would hope someone would do the same for my daughter if it was her in that situation.

    Certified Instructor for Minnesota Carry Permit
    NRA Pistol and Personal Protection Insrtuctor
    Utah Permit Certified Instructor

  2. #17
    Member Array crookcatchr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Birmingham, AL
    HOnesty I don't know what I would do in that situation (as that was what I voted). I do hope that in a situation like that I would be able to do something to help out.

    Theres no such thing as owning to many guns.

  3. #18
    VIP Member Array Ti Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Under Cover

    Legal aspects keep many circumstances left alone but if it comes down to life or death of a GG then I have no doubt I would help an innocent person in need. The legal system is at fault for even having a poll for such a thing and we should not have to second guess our actions to do the right thing and help someone in need and end up in court fighting for your freedom because of an overzealous DA that wants to set an example of you or fear that the BG's family will sue you for everything you have because you shoot there criminal son or daughter.

    If the legal ramifications do not make one think long and hard about taking action! they don't have anything to protect from the court system because that is what it comes down to. The court system put's all of us in a position we shouldn't have to be, in order to protect another.

    I also have a problem with people "NOT" taking there own action and protecting themselves and there own (the sheeple) or anti's against threat's/attacks and will leave things up to the police and or a CHL permit holder to take action and protect them. I would bet that 9 out of every 10 times something goes down a CHL permit holder will be in a better position to end a threat in the real world. So with this, it even makes things much harder for me at least in making a decision to intervene.

    Train and train hard, you might not get a second chance to make a first impression!

    I vote for Monica Lewinsky's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife for President.....Not!

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #19
    Member Array vzwnnj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Put me down for "primarily for me and mine, but..."

    Given certain circumstances, I believe I would get involved

  6. #20
    VIP Member Array maclean3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Nashville, TN
    Like so many others here, I chose #3. The safety of my family and myself are the primary reasons I carry though I can imagine a few circumstances where I'd be compelled to intervene. The problem is, there are so many variables that it's impossible to say what I'd do in a given situation. Anything short of a rape or a child in danger I'd have to let the situation dictate my actions.

  7. #21
    Senior Member Array madmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Spring Hill, FL
    This thread is going about like I'd hoped!

    That was NOT a comment on how the votes are going, but for how everyone (who choses to post,) seems to be giving some insight on their postion without making negative statements on the choices others make.

    That's exactly what I was hoping to see.

    Please keep it going!!

    EDIT: I hope that some who have made the "me and mine, alone" statement get involved with this thread. So far, none have chosen that one. If you truely feel that way, cast your vote. If you feel so inclined, post your thoughts as to "why." If not, no problem, but at least cast a vote.

    Political Correctness has now "evolved" into Political Cowardice.

  8. #22
    New Member Array kobun kibun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    near LaPorte IN
    I would lean strongly toward option #3.

    If I intervened, I would have to be absolutely certain as to how the scenario unfolded, who the real victim and assailants are, etc.
    As already discussed in this forum, there have been many instances of mistaken identity in regards to who is the BG and who is the GG.

    I would also have to be certain that I would be able to control the situation without being harmed myself, or causing harm to innocent bystanders.

    Ussually in a situation like this, the best course of action is to call 911, monitor the situation, and then make a judgement on whether or not to intervene based on the cirumstances of the situation.
    Being proactive is the best way to avoid having to be defensive.

    Follow not in the footsteps of the masters, but rather seek what they sought.

    "Stategy is the craft of the warrior."-- Miyamoto Musashi

    Ars sine scientia nihil est.

  9. #23
    VIP Member
    Array Betty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    I said "I'll not stand idly by."

    Intervention can mean any number of things, from calling the police and trying to verbally intervene by yelling out that I've called the cops, to actually physically intervening, up to shooting in defense of a third party.

    My primary responsibility is to me and mine. I'll also help a fellow human being in need, to the degree that I can safely and legally do so and based on the interpretation of the scenario. Scenarios can be very hard to interpret. I don't want to shoot a person beating up on another who in reality was the victim who happened to get the upper hand when I came across the event, and I also won't shut my window while another Kitty Genovese is happening outside. Sometimes victims don't want help, like in domestic violence situations where the beatee ends up defending the beater. It may be gang-on-gang warfare that I don't want any part of.

    I must be very careful in how I determine what is going on and how to intervene. I will at least call the police.
    "Americans have the will to resist because you have weapons. If you don't have a gun, freedom of speech has no power." - Yoshimi Ishikawa

  10. #24
    Member Array ka0azs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Dayton Ohio
    I picked #3. Family is my PRIMARY responsibility and I will take no action that endangers them. If I'm not with them, then it becomes a tactical choice.

    My main reason for hesitation then would not be thinking about what an ambulance chaser might make of it, but due to lack of information as to what is really going on. An example is a domestic dispute where you may not know who the agressor is, and both might turn on you.

    I interpreted "intervention" to mean an active role such as verbally challenging or pulling my weapon.

    Calling the cops and observing from a safe location is not intervention to me, perhaps "respond" would be a better term..
    NRA Life Member

  11. #25
    Member Array Spectre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Voted #2.

    "All that is necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing."

  12. #26
    Lead Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    "All that is necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing."
    There ya have it...

  13. #27
    Senior Moderator
    Array Rock and Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    404 Page Not Found
    While I voted for "3", I strongly believe that:

    "All that is necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing."
    But, having agreed with that, this is very situational. If I know exactly what has happened, and what the facts are, and can intervene in a manner that does not put other parties at risk, I believe I'll step up to the plate.

    As paraphrased from the now famous "Sheepdog" speech/article, sheepdogs run to the sound of trouble.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ: Buy These Stickers Here

    "A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon the world" Albert Camus

  14. #28
    Senior Member Array BlueLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    It Changes...
    Too many good citizens have been taken advantage of from helping someone keep from getting their head smashed. Yeah, I'll help 911. Say, you squeeze off a couple and you hurt the one you are helping or damage their property. Now, you have that deal with and the fact you have just neutralized their attacker for good. Two Law suits...curtains for you buddy.
    Listen, Think and React.....Nuff Said.....

  15. #29
    Senior Member Array gddyup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Derry, NH
    I voted #3. I would like to have voted #2, but I feel that everything is situational based. I'll defend myself and my family first and foremost, but I will certainly not turn away from helping someone who is in desperate need if I know my choice is the right one. It depends on the situation and what I can learn about it very quickly. Being FD/EMT it's in my blood and my mindset to help others whenever and wherever I can and I will do so by choice. But, myself, my family, my friends....we come first. Starting in FF1 and EMT class it's been drilled into my head. Risk vs Reward. We don't "Go" unless the reward is worth the risk. Risk a lot to save a lot, risk a little to save a little, risk nothing to save nothing. That's the philosophy I follow.

    So, I'm a #3-#2... somewhere in there....
    "You've never lived until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know" - T.R.

    <----My LT was unhappy that I did not have my PASS-Tag at that fire. But I found the body so he said he would overlook it. :)

  16. #30
    Lead Moderator
    Array MattInFla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Central Florida
    I voted for #3, because intervention is such a situational thing. First, I agree with Betty that interention can mean many things.

    The level to which I will intervene is directly based on the knowledge I have of the situation. If I happen upon two guys fighting, I am not likely to intervene beyond calling 911 and informing them I have done so - I have no idea who the victim and aggressor actually are.

    Now if I happen to see the initiation of hostilities, and am clear on who the victim is, that is a different story.

    Of course, there are variables to consider - for example, if one of the parties is a law enforcement officer in uniform, it is pretty clear who is the party in the wrong and I'll hop in as needed.


Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Divine Intervention???
    By oneshot in forum Bob & Terry's Place
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: January 10th, 2010, 09:48 PM
  2. the dangers of intervention
    By seawolf1956 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: April 20th, 2009, 11:28 AM
  3. How Many Of Y'all See THIS As The First Step To UN Intervention....HERE?
    By ExSoldier in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: June 25th, 2006, 11:25 PM
  4. Intervention v. Non-Intervention
    By Miggy in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: October 20th, 2005, 10:46 PM