Intervention Rule? - Page 3

Intervention Rule?

This is a discussion on Intervention Rule? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; #3 . it would depend on the situation and circumstances, if I actively become involved or not. I would call 911 if needed. Alot depends ...

View Poll Results: Intervention Rule?

378. You may not vote on this poll
  • Absolute "For me and mine, ONLY!"

    12 3.17%
  • I'll NOT stand idly by.

    66 17.46%
  • Primarily "for me and mine," but may intervene under certain conditions.

    275 72.75%
  • I don't honestly know.

    25 6.61%
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 111

Thread: Intervention Rule?

  1. #31
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    #3 . it would depend on the situation and circumstances, if I actively become involved or not. I would call 911 if needed. Alot depends on who needs what kind of help. As if I had my lids with me or not.

  2. #32
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Making ammo.

    Good topic. Like the atmosphere.

    I choose to not stand idle. I carry for my protection, my families protection and the innocent victims who don't have the means to defend themselves for whatever (irrelevent) reason. Just because someone chooses not to carry a firearm doesn't mean they have any less privilege of being defended.

    I couldn't look myself in the mirror the next day and be proud of myself if I could have stopped something and somebody got hurt or killed because of my inaction.

    That being said, if I didn't know or couldn't tell if the 'victim' was an innocent victim or if they provoked the attack, then it's time to err on the side of caution and use the very least amount of force. Basically tell them to stop then spray everyone involved down with OC in a sort of spray and pray. Everyone with a clenched fist gets a one second burst for starters. Then we go from there.

    Every situation is different and I may stay back in some, but for the most part my rule is if it happens around me it it my business and I will do what I can to help out. My fiance already knows if I go to clear leather or tell her to leave to not question my words/ actions and just do it.
    07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006

    Probably the only home based FFL that doesn't do transfers.

  3. #33
    Member Array chiefs-special-guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    St Augustine solved this problem for me about 1600 yrs ago- so-called "Just War" theory. You may intervene,and you should, when 1. there is imminent danger to the innocent;2. intervention with force is the only effective choice; 3. you use proportionate force, sufficient to stop the attack, but not gratuitous punishment;4. there is a reasonable chance of success; believe you will do more good than bad, where the lives of aggressors are not counted as worthless, but are due less weight than innocent persons.
    Now, no one can run through this very carefully at the time- you need to reflect on it in advance as much as possible. This is my Christian understanding. You may kill someone if it is necessary to protect the innocent, especially the defenceless, children, women and so on.
    To do so is NOT a sin, and the Church teaches this as I have stated it.
    Admittedly these are the views of my faith tradition- others have other views and I honor those.
    God Bless
    Six for sure...Uh, I mean Five. Five for sure..

  4. #34
    Senior Member Array madmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Spring Hill, FL
    Being an agnostic, I just have to ask!

    Would you then say St. Augustine could be "our" patron Saint of Concealed Carry? (Prob'ly shouldn't have posted this.)

    mm < who sometimes cannot help himself!
    Political Correctness has now "evolved" into Political Cowardice.

  5. #35
    Senior Member Array madmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Spring Hill, FL
    I knew we'd get some "Honestly don't know" answers, those are not really hard to understand.

    And thanks to those who chose to add their votes to the "Me and mine, alone" catagory. Maybe not the most popular choice, but I was looking for honesty, thank you for providing that.

    I hope this thread and poll continues on a while longer. The bigger sampling, the better.

    Political Correctness has now "evolved" into Political Cowardice.

  6. #36
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Away - Health Problems

    heres the thread we had about a gun saint before

  7. #37
    Distinguished Member Array AKsrule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    For me , it would depend on the Actual situation.

    But , even though there might be legal consequences , I could
    not let an innocent come to harm if I felt I could prevent it.
    -SIG , it's What's for Dinner-

    know your rights!

    "If I walk in the woods, I feel much more comfortable carrying a gun. What if you meet a bear in the woods that's going to attack you? You shoot it."
    {Bernhard Goetz}

  8. #38
    Senior Member Array glock21guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Colorado Springs, CO
    I would like to say not stand idly by, but given the current sew happy clement we live in, I would have to be very, very sure before I pull the trigger. If we did watch out for each other the world would be a better place.

    Protecting a family member no hesitation on my part.

    If you don't protect your self, who will?

  9. #39
    Member Array rycher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Church Hill Tn
    Just voted number 3. This is honestly a hard call, I would definately want to help but also have all the facts. As Betty said, I would hate to shoot someone only to find that they were the victim and had fought back. Anyone had better know the situation, especially before using deadly force.

  10. #40
    New Member Array EN 1Lt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006


    Hello this is my first post and I dont know if this is off topic.
    But the question to intervin or not, in not so much about if you are carrying at that time. But rather is you would become involed if you were unarmed.

    Though the legal ramifications of carrying are important. I think they are secondary.

    I voted #2

    Sorry for the crude post

  11. #41
    Senior Member Array rfurtkamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Pocatello, Idaho
    I've done #2, been convicted for #2, will do #2 again.
    Driver carries less than $45 worth of remorse.

  12. #42
    VIP Member Array Euclidean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    And that's why when I am king, rfurtkamp will be president. He carries less than $45 worth of remorse.

  13. #43
    VIP Member (Retired Staff) Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    South West PA
    Haha - Robert for Prez!!

    EN 1Lt - welcome to CC
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!." - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  14. #44
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005

    I'm no LEO nor coward, but I am a dad and employer who's depended on.
    As such I'll do what's situationally required, no less and no more.

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  15. #45
    mik is offline
    Member Array mik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005

    There's not much difference between #2 and #3, but enough to discriminate as to getting involved or not. I'll observe the situation (possibly very quickly), and then decide. Domestic arguement? - Probably not. Crazed ex-lover about to stab the other ex? - I'd intervene in some way. Pulling the trigger will be the last resort intervention, as I'm sure it would be for all you, but if the ex-lover won't stop his attack and I'm sure it's lethal, I'd stop it for him.

    As the saying goes ... "It depends"

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Divine Intervention???
    By oneshot in forum Bob & Terry's Place
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: January 10th, 2010, 09:48 PM
  2. the dangers of intervention
    By seawolf1956 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: April 20th, 2009, 11:28 AM
  3. How Many Of Y'all See THIS As The First Step To UN Intervention....HERE?
    By ExSoldier in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: June 25th, 2006, 11:25 PM
  4. Intervention v. Non-Intervention
    By Miggy in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: October 20th, 2005, 10:46 PM