CCW Vs medical mary jane

CCW Vs medical mary jane

This is a discussion on CCW Vs medical mary jane within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; question.... I have a good friend who has his CCw here in Colorado. He is also disabled and on social security. His doctor is willing ...

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 91

Thread: CCW Vs medical mary jane

  1. #1
    Member Array denverbear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denver Metro area
    Posts
    168

    CCW Vs medical mary jane

    question....

    I have a good friend who has his CCw here in Colorado.
    He is also disabled and on social security.
    His doctor is willing to give him a medical card for marijuana but I told him he might not be able to carry if he does this....has there been any discussion on this at all...if a doctor does authorize can he still legally carry or does that make null his CCW license.
    here in Colorado on your application it does ask about drugs.
    since it is considered a prescription and is legal here to use will this effect his CCw?????
    never run into this question before.
    Glock 23
    Beretta 92fs
    Ruger Mark 3
    S&W 642
    Looking


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array farronwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,880
    I guess one would have to see what the exact wording is on both the CCW application or laws regarding the CCW, and the laws regarding medical useage of pot.

    Since we don't allow medical usage down here in Texas it wouldn't fly here.
    Just remember that shot placement is much more important with what you carry than how big a bang you get with each trigger pull.
    www.ddchl.com
    Texas CHL Instructor
    Texas Hunter Education Instructor
    NRA Instructor

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Array Bark'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    West Central Missouri
    Posts
    9,916
    As far as I'm concerned, it's no different than drinking alcohol and carrying or taking narcotic pain killers and carrying.

    While you are under the influence, you shouldn't be carrying...

    Not to say that your right to defend yourself, ends because you are under the influence, however, if you use a firearm, you may very likely get jammed up in civil litigation as well as possibly criminal charges.

    In Missouri, when ccw was passed, the penalties for gun offenses became enhanced. More serious charges and penalties for gun offense if you are also deemed under the influence.
    -Bark'n
    Semper Fi


    "The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."

  4. #4
    Member Array denverbear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denver Metro area
    Posts
    168
    My friend tells me that he would only use at nite when he goes to bed to help him sleep better....that being said it does stay in system about 30 days I hear so would he be considered under the influence even during the day when he has not used it since the previous nite....I mean how long does being under the influence last?? and are you really ok when you have not used it in 12 hours or so??
    Glock 23
    Beretta 92fs
    Ruger Mark 3
    S&W 642
    Looking

  5. #5
    New Member Array DanF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Spring, Tx
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Bark'n View Post
    As far as I'm concerned, it's no different than drinking alcohol and carrying or taking narcotic pain killers and carrying.
    Not that I condone any of it, but there is a HUGE difference, especially when compared to alcohol.

  6. #6
    VIP Member
    Array Hopyard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Disappeared
    Posts
    12,041
    I agree with the person who wrote that it would really depend on the exact wording of the specific laws regarding issuance/retention of a CHL in your state.

    You might start by looking into what the law (and actual state practice) does with the CHLs of folks taking pain medication or similar, perhaps anti-seizure meds, on a regular basis. I don't know for example if in your state taking diazepam like meds or barbiturates to prevent epileptic seizures would prevent you from obtaining a license.

    In the end, regardless of the law, the important question is one of impaired judgment.

    Sorry to hear your friend is ill.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Array Bark'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    West Central Missouri
    Posts
    9,916
    You make a good point, and that is going to have to be addressed via one avenue or another.
    -Bark'n
    Semper Fi


    "The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."

  8. #8
    VIP Member
    Array Hopyard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Disappeared
    Posts
    12,041

    toxicology

    Quote Originally Posted by denverbear View Post
    My friend tells me that he would only use at nite when he goes to bed to help him sleep better....that being said it does stay in system about 30 days I hear so would he be considered under the influence even during the day when he has not used it since the previous nite....I mean how long does being under the influence last?? and are you really ok when you have not used it in 12 hours or so??
    Having detectable levels of metabolites in your body and being under the influence are two different things. You can detect most drug use in hair samples 90 days after the fact; that doesn't mean the person is intoxicated for 90 days. Same for detection of metabolites in urine a couple of days after the fact; it doesn't translate to impairment. (Some of you may recall my previous posts advocating employment impairment testing rather than drug testing in the workplace.)

    That said, there is so much craziness in our society about drug use that one might well not expect jurors or jurists to rationally sort this sort of thing out.

    I have read somewhere along the way that the effect lasts about 8-12 hours, but I don't know if that is true and I am no expert, and moreover, it would depend on how much was used and its potency.

    I think if I were in your friend's situation, and out of an abundance of caution, I would not carry if I were using on a regular basis. Not, because I think it would necessarily be illegal or unsafe, but because it almost certainly would be misrepresented if he were involved in an SD shooting. The situation could be used to turn a perfectly good shoot into a charge or accrual of civil liability.

  9. #9
    Member
    Array Queensidecas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Posts
    147
    "intoxication" is intoxication. I know from the experience during my youth that a couple of bong hits or sharing a joint with someone puts you in an altered state. You are not stumbling around but you are most definately intoxicated. In fact I dont realy believe it is possible to smoke weed and not become intoxicated. You can drink a beer and maybe even two depending on weight and not experience intoxication, but the effects of smoking marajuana is immediate and noticable.

    I think most people understand this and that is why marajuana is not already legal everywhere. The loss of reasoning and motor function occurs along a different path than alcohol intoxication and cant be directly compared at all stages but it most defenately applies and will occur if consumed in excess just like with alcohol.

    Back to the original topic at hand, you are immediately intoxicated the moment you inhale marajuana. Unless you are an everyday smoker you are far beyond the equivilent of .08 after a few bong hits or a joint. I say all this to stress the fact that if you are going to smoke, you need to put the guns up in your safe and dont even think about carrying.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array Divebum47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    763
    Seems to me your friend would be better served seeking the advice of an attorney who practices in Colorado for the legal answer. From a personal standpoint, if I'm carrying, I don't drink, I don't do prescription meds which might affect my decision making process, and I don't do illegal drugs period, carrying or not.
    "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

  11. #11
    Member Array denverbear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denver Metro area
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by Divebum47 View Post
    Seems to me your friend would be better served seeking the advice of an attorney who practices in Colorado for the legal answer. From a personal standpoint, if I'm carrying, I don't drink, I don't do prescription meds which might affect my decision making process, and I don't do illegal drugs period, carrying or not.
    I am like you in that I stay the straight and narrow...I really don't drink anymore as being a diabetic it really screws with my body.
    I just know this question is going to come up and from my discussions with my friend I know he won't carry if he has been smoking but I was really concerned about the lasting effects when he was not using at the present moment.
    Glock 23
    Beretta 92fs
    Ruger Mark 3
    S&W 642
    Looking

  12. #12
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    13,687
    I would suggest your friend stay at home while he's on his medication. Drug and or alcohol abuse rules one out for a permit in my state. I think it would be a fine line to cross as to use and abuse, the laws, and the term 'under the influence'. My opinion is that alcohol is far worse than weed as far as how they affect the human body and brain. Thing is they can actually measure the effects of alcohol with tests, and with weed they can't. So anytime you smell like weed, it's kind of an automatic under the influence. I think one should always be at the top of their game when carrying. Drugs/alcohol and guns don't mix....it's been proven, and it continues to be proven day in and day out. I want to be around someone under the influence, carrying a gun, on the streets as much as I do working around a co-worker who's under the influence that could get me killed on the job.

  13. #13
    Moderator
    Array Bark'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    West Central Missouri
    Posts
    9,916
    Quote Originally Posted by Hopyard View Post
    Having detectable levels of metabolites in your body and being under the influence are two different things. You can detect most drug use in hair samples 90 days after the fact; that doesn't mean the person is intoxicated for 90 days. Same for detection of metabolites in urine a couple of days after the fact; it doesn't translate to impairment. (Some of you may recall my previous posts advocating employment impairment testing rather than drug testing in the workplace.)

    That said, there is so much craziness in our society about drug use that one might well not expect jurors or jurists to rationally sort this sort of thing out.

    I have read somewhere along the way that the effect lasts about 8-12 hours, but I don't know if that is true and I am no expert, and moreover, it would depend on how much was used and its potency.

    I think if I were in your friend's situation, and out of an abundance of caution, I would not carry if I were using on a regular basis. Not, because I think it would necessarily be illegal or unsafe, but because it almost certainly would be misrepresented if he were involved in an SD shooting. The situation could be used to turn a perfectly good shoot into a charge or accrual of civil liability.
    I agree Hopyard... Very well articulated. I also advocate "impairment testing" as opposed to testing for the presence and attempting to apply a certain or arbitrary level of presence as to what intoxication is. That is pretty archaic.

    For the record, in regards to alcohol. It is so quickly absorbed into the blood stream that you can place a drop on tongue and immediate draw a blood sample from the arm, and there will be a detectable reading showing the presence of alcohol in the blood.
    -Bark'n
    Semper Fi


    "The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."

  14. #14
    Distinguished Member Array Bunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    North Carolina - LKN
    Posts
    1,384
    I think it depends on the letter of the law. Here, it's to the effect of you can only have RX drugs, only ones that have been Prescribed to you by a licensed physician, and only in THERAPEUTIC doses in your system.

    Meaning if you take Adderall, for example, you have to have a Script for it, by a legit Doctor, and you have to take as directed or else you're in violation.

    I'd imagine that if your friend has a script for pot, then it's legal. Although personally, I would never carry while on a sedative/depressant. You open yourself to a world of scary "what ifs" including a messed up reaction time and a host of litigation and possible charges if you're involved in a shooting and you're high.
    Don't frisk me, I am the weapon.


    Sig Sauer P239 DAK (9mm)
    NRA Member & Pistol Instructor

    www.vanguardnc.com

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array Grant48's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    665
    Bear in mind that although state law may allow for prescription of "medical marijuana", possession of marijuana is still illegal under federal law...

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Medical Mary-Jane
    By jp4240 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: December 12th, 2009, 07:44 AM
  2. Britain: British Medical Association plans to "tag" medical records of gun owners
    By Miggy in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: September 3rd, 2009, 04:16 PM
  3. Hanoi Jane's At It Again
    By Captain Crunch in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: August 1st, 2005, 08:33 PM
  4. The Death Of Mary White
    By QKShooter in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 24th, 2005, 02:45 PM
  5. My Antique PLAIN JANE COLT Pic.
    By QKShooter in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 4th, 2005, 06:24 PM

Search tags for this page

ccw drug test

,
colorado ccw drug test
,
powered by mybb alcoholic addiction
,

powered by mybb colorado state

,
powered by mybb denver drug recall lawyers
,
powered by mybb drug addiction
,

powered by mybb drug recall

,

powered by mybb drug recall attorney

,
powered by mybb drug recall lawyers
,
powered by mybb medical association
,

powered by mybb missouri drug recall attorney

,

powered by mybb texas state

Click on a term to search for related topics.