Do you think additional training should be mandatory to carry concealed? - Page 2

Do you think additional training should be mandatory to carry concealed?

This is a discussion on Do you think additional training should be mandatory to carry concealed? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I think some states need to require more training for carry permits. I have known a few people that have permits that really dont have ...

View Poll Results: Should states mandate additional training in order to allow handgun carry?

Voters
315. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes! I want more mandated training!

    49 15.56%
  • No! We have enough mandates already!

    88 27.94%
  • I am not against more training as long as it is not mandatory.

    172 54.60%
  • I am undecided.

    6 1.90%
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 142

Thread: Do you think additional training should be mandatory to carry concealed?

  1. #16
    Member Array J Bowen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    371
    I think some states need to require more training
    for carry permits. I have known a few people that
    have permits that really dont have enough training
    to be carrying a firearm. Think in VA you dont even have
    to qualify with a gun to get a permit.
    However the training shouldnt be crazy expensive either.
    I would feel better if it took more training to get a permit
    as it could save a innocent bystander's life in a shootout
    and who knows I could be the innocent bystander one day


  2. #17
    Member Array woodstock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    155

    Along with mandatory training...

    Science fiction author Robert Heinlein created an entire future world and one of the tenets of that society was that you were only eligible to vote if you had served a career in the military.

    Just serving an enlistment wasn't enough, a career. He figured if you weren't interested enough to protect and defend the country then you got no say in how it was run. Full citizenship required payment up front.

    Both ideas are too extreme for me. When I was younger I liked the idea of earning the right to vote by serving first. But the founders saw more clearly than I did - on both counts.

    We have our rights and now must protect and defend them. We don't get to tell the other person how they have to earn their rights.
    The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good.

    George Washington

  3. #18
    Member Array TravisABQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Moving to Texas
    Posts
    499
    How about if the states require a $1000 license fee, a $3000 training course which is only available from a handful of trainers, with a waiting list of 2 years, to make sure the poor, inner city blacks, and "trailer trash" can't afford it, or don't bother?

    Because that really IS the point isn't it?

    Every gun control law in the last 150 years was designed to disproportionately afflict people of the wrong race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic class.

    Any call for "more training" is intended to make CC difficult and expensive, so that the "wrong people" stay disarmed.

  4. #19
    Member Array Cericko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    44
    The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution simply states "...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It doesn't say "only after demonstrating proficiency" or "only after eight (8) hours of classroom instruction from a certified instructor."

    I don't argue that education is important and practice is extremely valuable; however, to limit a law abiding citizen's ability to "keep and bear arms" or obtain a CWP and carry hurts the community, state, and nation.

    Both Pennsylvania and Georgia (the two states that I reside and have CWP's) only require the applicant to be able to write a check. I had my PA-CWP before I had a weapon. I practice drawing and shooting multiple targets with multiple magazines at least twice a month or I don't carry. As so many have said more often and better than I, "in a survival situation, you react based on what you've practiced." So those that buy a gun, get a CWP, and then carry without instruction or practice are putting themselves in harms way. And they aren't going to be a member of this forum either!
    "A strong body makes a mind strong. As to the exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives a moderate exercise to the Body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind . . . Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks."
    --Thomas Jefferson August 1785

  5. #20
    Member Array error4o4's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lawrence, KS
    Posts
    28
    I look at this as a RKBA issue. I don't need a permit to exercise my right to free speech, or any other rights outside of RKBA, with the emphasis on 'bear arms', and arguably the right to peaceably assemble. Seeing as how we already have to jump through hoops to participate in a god-given right, i don't think it's necessary or constitutional to mandate additional training. Further mandates will only serve to turn concealed carry into a means of defense only certain citizens are able to afford.
    ________________

    "The first thing you have to do is disarm the people. A disarmed public can't fight back" -- Adolf Hitler

  6. #21
    Senior Member Array JohnK87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hastings, MN
    Posts
    600
    Rights should not be subject to licensing.

    I'm all for training, get as much as you can, but adding costs before you are "allowed" to carry the handgun is a form of rationing.

    Minnesota requires an 8 hour classroom including live fire. It cost me $125 for the class, another $100 for the license, plus I had to take a day off work.
    ‎An enemy of liberty is no friend of mine. I do not owe respect to anyone who would enslave me by government force, nor is it wise for such a person to expect it. -- Isaiah Amberay

  7. #22
    Member Array Smoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    61
    Jeez, has anybody seen a goverment run program that ran on time, under cost, or without miles of red tape? Just because of the nature of getting more people involved to certify something like this, it has to become more complicated. If I need training it's my duty to go find it, wether it's shooting targets or Close Quarters Combat.
    Back to the "freedom has responsibities" arguement. Do it because you want to, or feel your need to, not because you're told to, usually by somebody that doesn't have as much idea what you need as you do.
    "Come Watson, the game is afoot!"

  8. #23
    VIP Member
    Array Thumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    7,341
    Yeah, we need mandated instruction all right...

    "We are very sorry to in form you Mr. Jones that you Carry Permit has been revoked because you failed to provide proof of antiquate training and or monthly practice under the supervision of a State Licensed firearms instructor."
    ALWAYS carry! - NEVER tell!

    "A superior Operator is best defined as someone who uses his superior
    judgement to keep himself out of situations that would require a display of his
    superior skills."

  9. #24
    Member Array Mountaineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Cycler View Post
    How about adding gun handling and safety to the public school mandatory curriculum? Then at least most folks would make it out of the system with some exposure and hopefully the realization that they need more training if they want to carry.

    Just a nutty idea....flame on.
    This is the BEST IDEA EVER!

  10. #25
    Member Array J Bowen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    371
    I really like the idea of firearm safety classes in our schools.
    good point to mention Cycler.
    They already teach family life and such why not firearms?
    Guns are everywhere and in most homes anyway
    Kids need to be taught firearm safety it would save many lives

  11. #26
    Member Array Mountaineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    116
    MI has some nutty laws. It's OK to OC without a permit, but is you want to put the same equipment under your clothes, or carry it IN your car, you need training, be able to stay on the paper at 20 yrds and license. That I don't understand.

    When I look at all the traffic accidents and think all the pore drivers, I say to my self, "this is the result of a government run licensing program". I'm pretty sure licensing for CC isn't really a whole lot of good...

  12. #27
    Member Array Sgt Z Squad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Democratic Socialist Connecticut
    Posts
    120
    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    I encourage all of you to read, "That Every Man Be Armed" by Stephen Halbrook (Welcome to StephenHalbrook.com), who chronicles what the intentions of our founding fathers and their reasoning for the above language.

    The right to self defense through arms is a natural right. Those who take this seriously, know that training is good, but we should not be curtailing this right to anyone who is lawfully allowed to arm themselves for the purpose of self defense.

    LEO w/ 29 + years of service, USMC 1975 to 1979
    Certifed Sig Classic Pistol Armorer
    USMC: 1975-1979
    Lawdog: 1980 to ???
    Soldier of Christ: January 2000 to Eternity
    A Sheepdog who has found the Shepherd
    Romans 5:8

  13. #28
    Distinguished Member Array Tally XD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    1,830
    Quote Originally Posted by Cericko View Post
    The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution simply states "...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It doesn't say "only after demonstrating proficiency" or "only after eight (8) hours of classroom instruction from a certified instructor."

    I don't argue that education is important and practice is extremely valuable; however, to limit a law abiding citizen's ability to "keep and bear arms" or obtain a CWP and carry hurts the community, state, and nation.
    Could not agree with you more! However, for some reason, those others on that forum I spoke about seem to think that the 2A only protects our right to own a gun, not carry one!!

    Excuse me, I said, "keep and bear" arms seems to indicate that carrying firearms is included in the 2A.
    I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.
    - Barack Obama Chicago Tribune, April 27, 2004

  14. #29
    VIP Member Array TN_Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Shelby County TN
    Posts
    11,134
    My vote is NO.

    Honestly, the Second Amendment allows us to own and carry (Keep and Bear) arms and there is no stipulation on training at all. In the strictest reading of the Constitution, no training at all should be mandated, and indeed the Government shouldn't even be able to mandate that we need a permit to carry our weapons.

    The older I get, the less my carry permit is a badge of honor and more a thorn in my side.
    ,=====o00o _
    //___l__,\____\,__
    l_--- \___l---[]lllllll[]
    (o)_)-o- (o)_)--o-)_)

  15. #30
    Member Array ranburr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by woodstock View Post
    Science fiction author Robert Heinlein created an entire future world and one of the tenets of that society was that you were only eligible to vote if you had served a career in the military.

    Just serving an enlistment wasn't enough, a career. He figured if you weren't interested enough to protect and defend the country then you got no say in how it was run. Full citizenship required payment up front.

    Both ideas are too extreme for me. When I was younger I liked the idea of earning the right to vote by serving first. But the founders saw more clearly than I did - on both counts.

    We have our rights and now must protect and defend them. We don't get to tell the other person how they have to earn their rights.
    You had better go back and read your history as far as what the founders required for someone to be able to vote.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Nebraska Concealed Carry Training Classes
    By cmzneb in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 10th, 2009, 08:45 PM
  2. Richmond, Va. firearms/concealed carry training & Utah class - March/April dates
    By ProShooter in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 28th, 2009, 02:15 PM
  3. Concealed carry training STL, MO
    By bradcat in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 18th, 2009, 12:55 PM
  4. How Many have taken additional training?
    By Sheldon J in forum Defensive Carry & Tactical Training
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: August 14th, 2008, 10:04 AM
  5. Beginning shooter ... .22 mandatory????
    By Interloper in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: April 18th, 2007, 03:23 PM