Last resort or first choice?

Last resort or first choice?

This is a discussion on Last resort or first choice? within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I was thinking earlier (I know...I probably shouldn't do that ) about our philosophy on self-defense. It seems that most of us feel that our ...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Last resort or first choice?

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array KenpoTex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    2,193

    Last resort or first choice?

    I was thinking earlier (I know...I probably shouldn't do that ) about our philosophy on self-defense. It seems that most of us feel that our weapons are a last resort, something we deploy only after we've exhausted other options for dealing with the situation (OC, empty-hand, etc.).

    Is this really the way we ought to approach the situation? Let me explain where I'm going with this and y'all tell me what you think.

    Let's assume that we are involved in a situation where we are in danger of suffering from serious injury or death. This could be because we have been "ambushed" by someone waiting for a victim to come along. It could also be because we failed to properly handle the "interview" stage of the confrontation (or they guy just isn't going to back down despite our best efforts) and now the perp has succeeded in closing range and is now close enough to do us harm. Either way, we are dealing with a situation in which we have been chosen as the victim of a violent crime (robbery, rape, kidnapping, etc.) These situations do NOT include bar-fights or other "stupid" situations where we are mutual-combatants.

    So here's the question: In a situation like the examples I gave, should we try to run all the way up the "force continuum" (I hate that term) from least dangerous to most dangerous, or should we immediately respond with the most effective tools at our disposal?

    My thinking is that in a situation where we (or someone we're protecting) are in danger of being seriously injured or killed; we should respond immediately with overwhelming force. For example, let's say I've been approached by someone using one of the common ruses/techniques to get close ("hey buddy, you have the time, etc.). I do all the stuff I'm supposed to do: verbal-tactics, defensive posture, etc. and he continues to approach. At this point, he's demonstrated that he has illegal intentions.

    My response at this point would be to immediately access my firearm. Depending on the exact situation and preceding events, I might only obtain my firing grip (showing him that I'm armed and giving him one last chance to disengage); I might go ahead and draw. Either way, I'm not going to waste time with "less-lethal" methods when I've got a articulable threat to my safety/life. I am proficient in empty-hand fighting and defensive/offensive knife use. However, I see these skills only as ways to either buy me time to access my most effective weapon--my firearm, or as methods that I can use if for some reason I was unarmed or unable to access my firearm. Regardless, I'm going to employ the methods that will allow me to neutralize the threat in the most efficient manner possible.

    Hopefully some of my rambling made sense.

    Any thoughts?
    "Being a predator isn't always comfortable but the only other option is to be prey. That is not an acceptable option." ~Phil Messina

    If you carry in Condition 3, you have two empty chambers. One in the weapon...the other between your ears.

    Matt K.


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array CopperKnight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Spokane area, WA
    Posts
    6,742
    I'm going to agree with you on this one. If the guy is close enough and has shown the intent to do damage, I'm probably not going to mess with several of the "less lethal" methods at my disposal if I don't think I have time to employ them and still get the gun if needed.
    eschew obfuscation

    The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Array Rock and Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado at 11,650'
    Posts
    12,732
    I agree also - from a logical standpoint it appears to be the right answer. Personally, I have only my wits of debatable value, some OC, a knife that would get me sliced up like bacon, and my sidearm.

    Overwhelming force, until they stop.

  4. #4
    VIP Member
    Array Team American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,826
    Good post, Matt

    Could carrying a knife or OC spray as a "less lethal" alternative actually prove to be a liability in court...

    "Mr. Team American, you had access to other means of persuasion when Mr. Thugwitt allegedly tried to rob you at knifepoint...why didn't you try one of those instead of pulling your Colt pistol and prematurely ending his life?"

    It is something to think about...
    "I surrounded 'em"- Alvin York

    "They're ain't many troubles that a man can't fix with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six"- Jeff Cooper

  5. #5
    Distinguished Member Array AKsrule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,387
    I am 55 , not in great physical shape , and have some infirmities
    which will only worsen over time.

    If threatened with bodily harm , my first course of action will be
    to prevent it from happening , no matter the cost.

    To quote one of my favorites ----

    "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on.
    I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them."


    John Bernard Books (The Shootist)
    -------
    -SIG , it's What's for Dinner-

    know your rights!
    http://www.handgunlaw.us

    "If I walk in the woods, I feel much more comfortable carrying a gun. What if you meet a bear in the woods that's going to attack you? You shoot it."
    {Bernhard Goetz}

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array A1C Lickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,063
    We were taught to always be ready to go one step ahead in the force structure (or whatever they called it, I really can't remember now..) Basically, if they're talking, talk, but be ready to be aggressive. If they're being aggressive, be ready to use compliance techniques. If they're being physical, use non-lethal, but be ready to use lethal force.
    TSgt. Lickey

    It takes a college degree to break'em;
    and a high school education to fix'em!

  7. #7
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,069
    Quote Originally Posted by A1C Lickey
    We were taught to always be ready to go one step ahead in the force structure (or whatever they called it, I really can't remember now..) Basically, if they're talking, talk, but be ready to be aggressive. If they're being aggressive, be ready to use compliance techniques. If they're being physical, use non-lethal, but be ready to use lethal force.
    Same here. the force response gets steep fast if someone has a deadly weapon & is in close proximity.
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Array Rock and Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado at 11,650'
    Posts
    12,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Team American

    Could carrying a knife or OC spray as a "less lethal" alternative actually prove to be a liability in court...

    "Mr. Team American, you had access to other means of persuasion when Mr. Thugwitt allegedly tried to rob you at knifepoint...why didn't you try one of those instead of pulling your Colt pistol and prematurely ending his life?"

    It is something to think about...
    Good question, Sir.....<stall for time...> Hmmm...

    I should probably defer to some more experienced hands here, but here goes. Could this argument not be made that you did not flee? You did not use a cane as a club? I don't know where the line is drawn, but legally it's fear of my bodily safety, so the 21 foot rule is definitely in play here. My knife is for chores (cutting rope, screws, etc.) I'm not trained in the art of "knifework", and it stays in my pocket unless needed for chores (no clip). The OC is for dogs, etc. I think sidearm use perfectly justifiable here from my perspective.

    What I am uncomfortable about is the legal issue - can and has this be used in courts? I would assume yes? If so - successfully?

  9. #9
    VIP Member
    Array dr_cmg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    10,808
    Come June 1 that will not be a problem for me. I have no duty to retreat and I by law have the right to use lethal force to a threat or perceived threat. Of course that does not mean that I will automatically shoot someone who makes a remark that is threatening, but it does mean that less than lethal force does not need to be my first response.

    In a situation where less than lethal force is available and obviously all that is required (with the emphasis on obviously) if I used lethal force I would be in big trouble. Obviously? A 75 year old man comes at me screaming and swinging his cane. The use of lethal force would not be justified. If he requires a cane I should be able to side step him. If I am backed into a corner and have no way of escape? Use of force might be justified, but shooting for COM would probably not be a good idea. At that point unless I am in lots worse shape than I am now I should be able to take care of the situation without resorting to use of a firearm.
    George

    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array Tom357's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Richmond VA
    Posts
    1,068
    Quote Originally Posted by kenpotex
    I was thinking earlier (I know...I probably shouldn't do that ) about our philosophy on self-defense. It seems that most of us feel that our weapons are a last resort, something we deploy only after we've exhausted other options for dealing with the situation (OC, empty-hand, etc.)...Let's assume that we are involved in a situation where we are in danger of suffering from serious injury or death...Either way, we are dealing with a situation in which we have been chosen as the victim of a violent crime (robbery, rape, kidnapping, etc.)...So here's the question: In a situation like the examples I gave, should we try to run all the way up the "force continuum" (I hate that term) from least dangerous to most dangerous, or should we immediately respond with the most effective tools at our disposal?...My thinking is that in a situation where we (or someone we're protecting) are in danger of being seriously injured or killed; we should respond immediately with overwhelming force...
    I'm certainly one of those who thinks of lethal force as a last resort. I don't think the scenarios you described violate that concept, though. Sometimes, the situation escalates so quickly that a less-than-lethal option isn't available or appropriate. Still, we have to quickly and accurately analyze what's happening in a given situation and consider the less-than-lethal options available to us before drawing, and depending on where we live, we may have a duty to retreat if at all possible and we may have to match the force being used against us (or risk having our lives ruined for immediately using overwhelming/unnecessary force). In your scenarios, you've already done that analysis (or determined that you can't us less-than-lethal options) before you get to the point of drawing, by concluding that you are in a life-threatening situation where lethal force would be appropriate.

    You go to the appropriate tool for the situation, which may be evading, persuasion, OC, open hands, or a pistol, staying mindful of what the law says you must do. To save yourself, you may have to violate the law. I don't think it means you have to take OC to a gunfight. Was that coherent?
    - Tom
    You have the power to donate life.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array gddyup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Derry, NH
    Posts
    988
    When confronted with non-lethal force, respond in kind. When confronted with what you perceive to be, and what any normal person would conceive to be, lethal force, respond in kind.

    If it gets to contact distance, strike first and then go for your gun if needed. The last thing a bg is going to expect is a voracious first action by you. He has picked you as a victim for whatever reason and feels he has an advantage. Action beats reaction every time. Strike first, strike hard, be ruthless. Once the bg is on the defense, you are in control. Answer his actions from a vantage point of being on the offense.
    Firefighter/EMT
    "You've never lived until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know" - T.R.

    <----My LT was unhappy that I did not have my PASS-Tag at that fire. But I found the body so he said he would overlook it. :)

  12. #12
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    ''Thinking time'' is almost certainly going to be in short supply - so we have to decide, FAST what it is we will do.

    Bottom line I think is, if the threat is immediately perceived as presenting great danger then probably the gun has to come out - we cannot always enjoy the time luxury of grading a threat into non-lethal - less-than-lethal - and lethal, and then fishing for what might be the appropriate tool to match that - things go down too fast.

    We either have to defend aggressively or find a way to get the heck out of Dodge if not already attempted. I also am far from fit compared with 20 years ago and more - I would have to depend on ''tools'' other than a hands-on approach mostly.

    Whether we can retrospectively explain our choice of firearm's use will depend obviously on whether we made our assessment correctly - that is down to the split decision needed when faced with severe threat. This all shows yet again just how important alertness has to be - to give us more options and time to make a best judgement call.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array '75scout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,170
    Same as Rock and GLOCK, my knife is for chores and although it has a clip I don't like others knowing that I have one. And anyone in close proximity with any deadly weapon has just forced me to draw and most likely fire. Not many other possibilities for me. No training in knife combat or hand-to-hand, thats why I'll carry when I turn 21 and get my CHL. Plus it would be justifiable and he/she has just put me and any family members at risk to grave bodily harm or death.

  14. #14
    New Member Array Sloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    1
    Another Kenpo guy from Springfield, MO that's into guns. What do you know.

    Anyway, I agree with the general majority. One should use the amount of force that you feel necessary to defend yourself. Even if the court doesn't end up seeing it your way, it's still better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

    The only problem I see with the guy walking up to you asking for the time, and seeming very suspicious, is that even if you feel 100% at the time that he's up to something, and he keeps walking towards you even after you've told him the time or that you don't have a watch, and if you end up drawing on him... What if he is just a weirdo or mentally unstable? What if he doesn't have bad intentions? What if he ignores the gun and just keeps walking? If you draw, you've got to be prepared to shoot... Not that you shouldn't draw, just throwing a bone of sorts.

  15. #15
    VIP Member Array KenpoTex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    2,193
    Quote Originally Posted by dr cmg
    In a situation where less than lethal force is available and obviously all that is required (with the emphasis on obviously) if I used lethal force I would be in big trouble.
    Very true, I wasn't trying to convey the impression that immediate use of deadly force is the answer to all situations.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom357
    Sometimes, the situation escalates so quickly that a less-than-lethal option isn't available or appropriate.
    Well put, that's what I was getting at. I think that many people have trouble wrapping their mind around the idea that, depending on the situation, they may have to use deadly force as the first option.

    In my initial post I used the term "force continuum" and also mentioned that I really don't like that term. My reasoning here is that when we use a term like "continuum," there is an inferrance that we have to follow a set progression. For example, here's a basic idea of what a "continuum" model might look like.

    1.Verbal tactics -> 2."soft" empty-hand (pain compliance, control/restraint techniques) -> 3. Control device (OC/taser) -> 4. "hard" empty-hand (striking to vital targets) -> 5. Impact-weapons -> Deadly Force (edged weapons and firearms).

    The problem with this type of model is that some people get locked in to the idea, sometimes even subconsciously, that they have to follow the "steps" from A-Z without skipping anything in between. The problems with this line of thought are obvious. Given the dynamics of a violent assault, you probably won't have time to run all the way up the ladder. If you try, more than likely, you'll get caught before you reach the point where you use the proper level of force to handle the situation.

    Instead of a ladder, stair-step, or whatever; I think a better analogy would be that of a tool-box or grab-bag containing all your use-of-force options from which you could select the option that best suits the situation. It might mean that you go from verbal tactics straight to the use of a firearm but if that is what's called for by the situation then you've done it right.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sloth
    What if he is just a weirdo or mentally unstable? What if he doesn't have bad intentions? What if he ignores the gun and just keeps walking? If you draw, you've got to be prepared to shoot...
    There's no way to know his mental/emotional state. The fact that he has continued to advance despite repeated verbal commands and a drawn firearm is a pretty defensible indicator that he does not have good intentions.

    If we have to defend ourselves, the investigation is going to be based on the totality of circumstances. In other words, my actions based on my perception of the events and whether my actions and perceptions were consistent with those of a reasonable person. I think most reasonable people would agree that someone willing to advance on an armed individual who has already warned them off definately poses a threat.
    "Being a predator isn't always comfortable but the only other option is to be prey. That is not an acceptable option." ~Phil Messina

    If you carry in Condition 3, you have two empty chambers. One in the weapon...the other between your ears.

    Matt K.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Specter Gear Last Resort Belt
    By utarch00 in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: April 26th, 2012, 09:22 AM
  2. Need CCW choice help
    By tex4711 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: March 18th, 2010, 09:29 PM
  3. Florida Retirees Resort to Firepower to Take Out Pesky Ducks
    By miklcolt45 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: April 7th, 2008, 10:21 PM
  4. If you had your choice.....
    By Jaystekan in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 26th, 2007, 05:45 PM
  5. Three Tragic Deaths at Florida Resort
    By riverbruce in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 15th, 2006, 11:26 AM

Search tags for this page

homicide and stabbing the abdomen

,
maine duty to retreat
Click on a term to search for related topics.