Brady Campaign response to recent events... - Page 4

Brady Campaign response to recent events...

This is a discussion on Brady Campaign response to recent events... within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by varob Then we would have to call the United States, England. Ha Ha Ha Only difference here would be the Army/Navy/RAF have ...

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 54 of 54

Thread: Brady Campaign response to recent events...

  1. #46
    Member Array Tint Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sussex UK
    Posts
    187
    Quote Originally Posted by varob View Post
    Then we would have to call the United States, England.
    Ha Ha Ha
    Only difference here would be the Army/Navy/RAF have roving patrols which I believe are armed...Sort or Quick Reaction Force (QRF)
    Maybe that's the solution for you guys?

    Tint Bob (UK)


  2. #47
    Ex Member Array Cold Warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Carrollton, Ohio
    Posts
    1,059
    Dayton, Ohio, at Hara Arena and at the Sharonville Convention Center: "Bill Goodman's Gun and Knife Showwwww...tell a buddyyyyy...bring a friendddd!"
    We are gonna spread the word to the undercover spies of NYC Mayor Bloomturd. Mind your owned damned business, unless you've got a budget surplus, and stay the hell away from our gun shows!

  3. #48
    Member Array natticarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    cincinnati
    Posts
    138
    I would point out that the one fallacy in our argument is when people of a certain theological persuasion (jihadist) gets their hands on weapons they don't care if they are going down. That being said even though everyone being armed might not be a deterrent to those people it would certainly minimize the casualties.

  4. #49
    Member Array BaserRonin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    304
    Natti, that is exactly the point. You nailed. If someone is going to go on a shooting rampage, you are not going to prevent them from doing it. Taking them out early prevents them from doing maximum damage. The more people carrying, the greater the opportunity to minimize the damage.


    I like to go to the Brady site to see what weapons are on their watch list as the most dangerous, then buy one. They need to update it more often though.

    Edit: I just went to look for their watch list for the most concerning of the dangerous guns and didn't find it. Bummer, it always cracked me up to use them a shopping guide.

  5. #50
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,418
    Quote Originally Posted by BaserRonin View Post
    Natti, that is exactly the point. You nailed. If someone is going to go on a shooting rampage, you are not going to prevent them from doing it. Taking them out early prevents them from doing maximum damage. The more people carrying, the greater the opportunity to minimize the damage.
    Absolutely.

    That's the most that can be done. No other solution comes close, short of full-body scans every 1000yds.

    And, that's ALL that can be expected.

    There are two absolute truths in this life: Life is a contact sport; and, There are no guarantees.

    So long as we're going to have a relatively free/liberal society where folks aren't subjected to scans and checks and roadblocks everywhere, this solution (of a fully-armed and -prepared populace) is also the solution that provides the maximal opportunity to take out violent criminals as soon as possible. So far as I can tell, nothing else comes close to this in simultaneously (a) maximizing liberties and free movement while (b) minimizing the ramifications from violent crime.

    Congress: What's so all-fired heinous about de-criminalizing the people to the point we're able to arm everyone who's willing? What're you afraid of ... that folks will come after you? Well then, get it right, if you're so concerned with that possibility of the sociopaths taking you out. But let's agree on one thing, that the days of trading political favors and protecting your own personal congressional skin at the expense of the lives of tens of thousands of the People (each year) is over.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  6. #51
    Ex Member Array Cold Warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Carrollton, Ohio
    Posts
    1,059
    They don't wanna leave D.C. because they will always need a cause, and a tax-exempt and a judicial government Santa Clause, with their gun-grabbing nagging-nanny hate, except maybe when they stay and play behind nice white D.C. suburbanite gates.

  7. #52
    Member Array MOS8541's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    15
    How about the Brady Campaign fighting to keep criminals in jail and fighting to use all the gun laws we already have.[/QUOTE]

    Now we're talking common sense!

  8. #53
    VIP Member
    Array msgt/ret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,767
    Quote Originally Posted by MOS8541 View Post
    How about the Brady Campaign fighting to keep criminals in jail and fighting to use all the gun laws we already have.
    Now we're talking common sense!
    That is where the brady’s are seriously short changed.
    When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
    "Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."

  9. #54
    Senior Member Array harley2007's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    USA!
    Posts
    1,046
    The Brady campaign, based on the things they have done, seriously feel that more laws with greater scope and reach, will affect the outcome of crimes committed by unlawful citizens…makes no sense logically.
    "I would rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!" - Dorothy Parker

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Brady Campaign
    By Pikachu711 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: May 1st, 2009, 11:11 PM
  2. Has recent events changed your carry rig/practice ?
    By Redneck Repairs in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: December 15th, 2007, 06:07 AM
  3. The Brady Campaign
    By ronwill in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 2nd, 2007, 09:26 PM
  4. Brady Campaign
    By Biloxi Bersa in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: November 21st, 2006, 02:25 AM
  5. Thank You Brady Campaign!!!!
    By MattInFla in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: July 9th, 2006, 01:57 AM

Search tags for this page

fn herstal bill goodman

Click on a term to search for related topics.