About Statute 930 Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facility

About Statute 930 Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facility

This is a discussion on About Statute 930 Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facility within the Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Before all of you crucify me please let me say that I know that CCing in Federal buildings is illegal, and for that reason I ...

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: About Statute 930 Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facility

  1. #1
    GM [OP]
    GM is offline
    VIP Member Array GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,866

    Question About Statute 930 Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facility

    Before all of you crucify me please let me say that I know that CCing in Federal buildings is illegal, and for that reason I WILL NEVER DO IT! Ok, just to make sure … I AM NOT ASKING IF I AM ALLOWED TO CONCEAL A FIREARM ON A GOVERNMENT PROPERTY. Here is my question: when reading the statute about it I am not sure that I know how to correctly interpret a subsection; Statute 930 Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities, Subsection (d) (3), at http://www.joebrower.com/RKBA/RKBA_F...FFRRG_2000.pdf, (almost at the end of Title 18 chapter 44, which is the first one).

    § 930. Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities
    (a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
    (b) Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
    (c) A person who kills or attempts to kill any person in the course of a violation of subsection (a) or (b), or in the course of an attack on a Federal facility involving the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, shall be punished as provided in sections 1111, 1112, and 1113.
    (d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to -
    (1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;
    (2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official
    or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law; or
    (3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.



    I am not referring to officers, agents, etc., authorized by law. Does this subsection imply that if the firearm or weapon is “incident to hunting or other lawful purposes” then the individual will not be prosecuted?
    "The Second Amendment: America's Original Homeland Security"


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array DaveH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Posts
    5,036
    "Federal facility" include lands not just buildings.

    There is legal hunting of some "Federal facility."

    OMHO, that's all this is talking about.

    To the best of my knowledge RKBA, self-protection, etc has not (yet) been found to be a "other lawful purpose" except where spelled out in statute or regulation -- e.g. such as NFS and soon to be NPS, to name a couple.
    Μολὼν λαβέ

    I'm just one root in a grassroots organization. No one should assume that I speak for the VCDL.

    I am neither an attorney-at-law nor I do play one on television or on the internet. No one should assumes my opinion is legal advice.

    Veni, Vidi, Velcro

  3. #3
    Member Array ak56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Carnation, Wa
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveH View Post
    "Federal facility" include lands not just buildings.

    There is legal hunting of some "Federal facility."

    OMHO, that's all this is talking about.

    To the best of my knowledge RKBA, self-protection, etc has not (yet) been found to be a "other lawful purpose" except where spelled out in statute or regulation -- e.g. such as NFS and soon to be NPS, to name a couple.
    "Federal Facility" does not include lands.
    18 CFR 930 (g) As used in this section:
    (1) The term “Federal facility” means a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties.
    As far as the RKBA etc. being "other lawful purpose", I agree, from all the previous threads on the subject, nobody seems to have found any definitive evidence that it qualifies.

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array MitchellCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    I don't post here anymore...Sorry
    Posts
    2,333
    It means that if you are bringing in a .22lr pistol with a suppressor on it because the Federal Judge walked into his office one morning, and saw a big racoon on his desk eating his M&M's, and told his clerk to call "Rat Rambos" and have that thing killed and the building exterminated NOW...

    You'd be cool.

  5. #5
    Distinguished Member Array BigStick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    Posts
    1,455
    Is there a definition or list somewhere of what does qualify as "other lawful purpose"? That would answer a lot of questions.
    Walk softly ...

  6. #6
    Member Array user's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Northern Piedmont of Va. & Middle of Nowhere, W.Va.
    Posts
    386
    "Other lawful purpose" means that one has to have a relatively specific purpose, like hunting. A vague desire for the ability to defend one's self against an unknown and highly speculative threat is probably not going to hold up in a U.S.District Court (though I think it should, particularly in light of recent statutory changes and the Heller case - I'm talking practical effect, not "should").

    The definition of "federal facilities" means ONLY buildings where federal employees (not concessionaires or contractors) regularly do whatever it is they do for the Government. An outhouse in a park is not a "federal facility", but the ranger station is.
    Daniel L. Hawes - 540 347 2430 - HTTP://www.VirginiaLegalDefense.com

    Nothing I say as "user" should be taken as either advertising for attorney services or legal advice. Legal questions should be presented to a competent attorney licensed to practice in the relevant state.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Does anybody have the portion of FL Statute in regards to no concealed weapons signs?
    By ROFL SQUAD in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: September 12th, 2014, 05:53 PM
  2. Interview tomorrow at a Federal facility
    By ExactlyMyPoint in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: August 18th, 2009, 05:52 PM
  3. firearms in a federal facility question
    By unrequited in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 24th, 2007, 11:24 PM
  4. Attention Florida! SB-2356 To Protect Possession of Firearms in Vehicles
    By Miggy in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: March 25th, 2007, 03:32 PM

Search tags for this page

firearm federal facility
,
firearms federal buildings
,

firearms in federal buildings

,

firearms in federal facilities

,
firearms on federal property
,
handgun possession federal building fine
,

possession of a firearm in a federal facility

,

possession of firearm on federal property

,
weapons in a federal building
,

weapons in federal buildings

,

weapons in federal facilities

,

weapons on federal property

Click on a term to search for related topics.