.380 ACP from Buffalo Bore -- 1200 fps, 288 ft-lbs
This is a discussion on .380 ACP from Buffalo Bore -- 1200 fps, 288 ft-lbs within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; OK, so if Ruger says "no hot rounds" and KelTec says "some hot rounds", it would seem prudent to buy a P3AT if one felt ...
-
April 29th, 2010 11:57 AM
#31
Distinguished Member
Array
OK, so if Ruger says "no hot rounds" and KelTec says "some hot rounds", it would seem prudent to buy a P3AT if one felt compelled to get a less-expensive 380. I do not like a 380 compared to larger calibers, but feel my concerns would be addressed somewhat by Buffalo Bore.
Yes, yes, 'save and get a Kahr PM9' - that's Plan A. But if concealability REQUIRES a P3AT / LCP, which should I get?
-
April 29th, 2010 11:57 AM
Remove Ads
-
May 10th, 2010 05:09 PM
#32
Member
Array
I have a Kahr pm9 and have loaded it with all the hot 9mm at one time or another ( including ranger 127 +P+) and it is a fine carry pistol.
But make no mistake, the pm9 is somewhat heavier to carry than the p380, which I also own and carry when I feel lazy or in shorts or whatever. Actually the p380 fits nicely into the desantis belt slide holster for the pm9.. a little loose but not bad.
When I do carry the p380, I often load with the Buffalo Bore HP and/or FMJ.
The recoil, at least from the Kahr, is noticably more but not uncomfortable
to shoot and follow up shots are no problem either.
I wouldn't try the BB with the LCP or the Keltec, may not hurt it but
who knows? I think I heard BB recommends fully supported chambers.
-
May 13th, 2010 01:12 AM
#33
Member
Array
A while ago on glocktalk or TFL I read about a kaboom in an LCP using the buffalo bore rounds. It had to do with the unsupported chamber. The pressures were way above SAAMI standards. I also read about an email reply from kahr and they said the buffalo bore loads were fine in their pistol. That's why I've had my eye on a good price for a kahr or sig 380 instead of an lcp. I think in a couple years when a good secondary market (used) developes the prices will come down on all those models.
-
May 13th, 2010 02:06 AM
#34
Member
Array
According to members of another forum the Buffalo Bore load is 25,000 psi.
+P, Buffalo Bore and what we've learned so far - thanks MountainGator
-
May 13th, 2010 10:05 AM
#35
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Ronny
That's 3,500 psi over SAAMI max for .380.
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. - Robert A. Heinlein
-
March 28th, 2013 07:25 PM
#36
New Member
Array

Originally Posted by
tokerblue
- Ruger's manual states not to use +P ammunition in their LCP. Reason enough to stay away from it.
The P3AT Kel is the ONLY "mouse gun" I have found that says +P is ok and then not to only use them.
-
March 28th, 2013 07:41 PM
#37
VIP Member
Array
Has anybody used this load in a Bersa thunder 380. Im interested in this load especially with 288 ft lbs of energy. Sounds like a good carry load for the 380.
-
March 28th, 2013 08:24 PM
#38
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Majorlk
That's 3,500 psi over SAAMI max for .380.
Since I like all of my fingers right where they are, I am not sure that I'd be comfortable firing that in any .380.
-
March 28th, 2013 09:31 PM
#39
Member
Array
Regardless if you care to roll the dice on what +P means to Buffalo Bore, Underwood, or Magtech you have to consider that Buffalo Bore and Underwood are buying bullets from companies that designed them for optimal expansions and penetration at velocities much lower than 1200 fps.
Case in point, my Underwood 380 +P test. Pocket Guns and Gear: Underwood Ammo 380 Auto +P GDHP Clear Gel Test It shows what happens to a good bullet pushed too fast.
Not trying to talk anyone into or out of buying what they want to buy. Just wanted to show another side effect of the increased velocity and energy.
-
March 29th, 2013 04:24 PM
#40
Member
Array
Buffalo Bore is my carry round no matter which gun I am packing. I have .380, .40, and 9mm that I carry from time to time. I use the +P or +P+ in all of them. I read somewhere in a ballistic test where a+P .380 100 gr FMJ penetrated 23" in gel.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By Boykinhntr in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 30
Last Post: March 28th, 2013, 07:51 PM
-
By Adkjoe in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 12
Last Post: February 12th, 2011, 03:35 PM
-
By Wishoot in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 0
Last Post: May 25th, 2010, 09:48 PM
-
By wormy in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 8
Last Post: March 3rd, 2010, 08:19 PM
-
By Casey in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 5
Last Post: September 4th, 2008, 01:36 AM
Search tags for this page
.380 acp buffalo bore
, 380 acp ballistics
, 380 acp buffalo bore
, 380 acp buffalo bore ballistics
, 380 acp fps
, 380acp buffalo bore ballistics
, buffalo bore .380 velocity test
, buffalo bore 380
, buffalo bore 380 acp
, buffalo bore 380 acp ammo
, buffalo bore 380 ballistics
, buffalo bore 380 hardcast
, buffalo bore 380 review
, buffalo bore 380 test
, what is the highest fps for a 380