This is a discussion on .40 S&W within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by OldVet The correct reference is the Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III. A common misconception. I stand corrected sir....
The basic SWC design consists of a roughly conical nose, truncated with a flat point, sitting on a cylinder. The base of the cone is slightly smaller in diameter than the cylinder, leaving a sharp shoulder. The flat nose punches a clean hole in the target, rather than tearing it like a round nose bullet would, and the sharp shoulder enlarges the hole neatly, allowing easy and accurate scoring of the target. The SWC design offers better external ballistics than the wadcutter, as its conical nose produces less drag than the flat cylinder.
I know what you're thinking: "Did he fire six shots or only five?" "Is that a Smith & Wesson 686+ 7 shot or 627 8 shot?" "Does he have a concealed Sig P226 SCT and two spare mags?" You've got to ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?
I was told that a flat nosed bullet acts and loads into the barrel like a hollow-point bullet does... yet you save money shooting the "target rounds" instead of the hollow-point ammo.
Bass pro Shops has a "Winchester private lable/Bass Pro only" ammo available and this was marketed as such... "practice with the less expensive flat nosed bullet and use the hollow-point as needed for hunting or self defense.
It's a "feeding into the barrel" issue for semi-auto's is how I understood it... but I could be wrong??????
Springfield XDM 40cal
Safariland Double Magazine Duty Pouch
High Noon "Slide Guard" Holster - Leather (OWB)
BladeTech "Eclipse" Holster - Kydex (OWB)
Aker Reinforced Gun Belt (Leather & Polymer)
Wilderness Tactical/Operator Belt (Kydex Reinforced)
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. - Robert A. Heinlein
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.
Necked it down? 10mm=.3937 inches ie. ,.40 caliber. They shortened the OAL to 1.135" from the 10mm's 1.275" OAL.So they necked it down- giving birth to the .40S&W. It's nose was flat- just like big brothers for the same reason.
The .40 S&W is the offspring of the 10mm Automatic. Due to the feed ramp geometry required to feed the 10mm, Norma designed the FMJ bullet profile as a truncated cone which also happened to match the ogive profile of the JHP. The .40 S&W used the same bullets as the 10mm, since the diameter is identical and the only other .40 caliber cartridge in that era was the .38-40 which were usually lead alloy and were not used in defensive or target ammunition made by the factories that made 10mm Automatic or .40 S&W ammunition. A truncated cone just happens to put more weight in the rear of the bullet which enhances gyroscopic stability which is also why match type rifle bullets have an open tip or hollow point design; moving weight to the rear enhances gyroscopic stability in flight.
So to answer your question, the 10mm Automatic used a truncated cone ogive bullet design to feed reliably with the feed ramp geometry in the Bren 10 pistol which said geometry was utilized by other 10mm Automatic firearm manufacturers since then. As the .40 S&W uses the 10mm bullets in a shorter case, they utilized the same bullets for logistical reasons. They then found the external ballistic capabilities of the truncated cone design and it is the best balance of ballistics that will feed and function reliably for those cartridges. The .45 ACP cartridge has recently been utilized with a TC profile FMJ or plated bullet to great results. Given the high velocity with heavy bullets, the Norma 10mm Automatic 200gr FMJ-TC at 1200fps was a milestone ballistically from an auto pistol and the TC profile also prevents deflection due to it's flat point meplat.
There isn't but one single answer as there are many.
07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006
The "1" didn't register when I typed it. I'll edit.
07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006
Tubby45- You're so cool.
G-23, 27, 35 (all .40)
Les Baer Thunder Ranch 5"
The .40/10mm is a recent development as far as cartridge design goes. It was developed from the beginning as a hollowpoint so the ogive design baseline would be a flat nose/hollowpoint. 9mm, .45 are old geezers compared to the 10mm design and were developed as LRN.
The 9mm Luger was developed as an 8 gram bullet (124 grains) using a jacketed spitzer ogive (actual radius I will have to look up, but I do have a custom bullet mold that is an identical match).
The .45 ACP was designed as a jacketed bullet for military use. I do recall the 200gr bullet weight being original to the M1905 pistol, but the 230gr bullet winning favor in the infamous (albeit controversial) Thompson-LaGarde (sp?) test and utilized in the adopted M1911 pistol for the US military.
Neither were developed as a lead round nose bullet. They were both traditional cup and core copper jacket over lead core utilizing the flat base full metal jacket that is common today.
07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006
Someone told me the reason they are flat nosed could be to cut down on weight. I don't know much about ballistics though so maybe that's way off.... also, why don't we see .40 +P ammo?
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went.
Im a big fan of the .22LR for bear defense.
Just shoot the guy next to you in the knee and run like heck.
Tubby45, That was a great explanation. Being of a technical background myself, I understand completely where you are coming from. Since I own two 40S&Ws, I kinda like to know as much about what I m shooting as possible.