Gun to bullet.
This is a discussion on Gun to bullet. within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; This may seem a simple question but I do have a simple mind.
Things being equal do certain bullet weights perform differently out of equal ...
October 29th, 2010 01:52 AM
Gun to bullet.
This may seem a simple question but I do have a simple mind.
Things being equal do certain bullet weights perform differently out of equal guns? As for instance does a 124 grain bullet perform better in a comparable Glock or Sig? I understand that certain guns like certain bullet weights, but why? If we're talking about say brand X's 4inch semi auto vs. brand Y's 4 inch semi auto, why is one gun a better performer with the same round? Let's not compare revolvers to semi's, just semi's to each other.
October 29th, 2010 02:05 AM
Guns are just like people, each one is different, as an example take two Ruger 10/22s one may work well with CCI Stingers yet with the other you cannot hit the broadside of a barn from inside with the same Stingers. Handguns are the same way take two handguns of any type even with consecutive serial numbers and with the same ammo one may put all rounds in the 10 ring yet the other gun will look like you used a shotgun instead. That is the reasoning behind trying different brands and weights of ammo before choosing what ammo to carry.
When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
"Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."
October 29th, 2010 05:22 AM
A lot depends on type of barrel, glocks and HKs use polygonal rifling, sigs and others use traditional land and grove. It is said poly rifling allows for greater velocity. But thats just one of the many factors that come into play.
November 2nd, 2010 06:11 PM
Guns are simply bullet launchers. Once the bullet leaves the barrel, what kind of firearm launched it makes no difference. Yes, bullet velocity, weight and design does make a difference. Traditionally hollow point bullets have worked better for self defense, but there is a "Ford vs. Chevy" debate on bullet weight that has been going on for decades.
Recently, with the explosion of self defense concerns, ammo makers have begun making self defense ammo a priority as opposed to target or sporting rounds. Some new technology is trending to "controlled expansion" types of bullets with a relatively soft polymer compound filling the hollow point cavity in order to control expansion. The problem has been, hollow points clogging when they pass through layers of clothing, leather, etc., failing to expand, in a sense becoming FMJ. Federal started a few years ago by introducing their EFMJ (Expanding Full Metal Jacket) rounds, followed closely by Cor-Bon's Pow-R-Ball. More recently Hornady has introduced Critical Defense ammo that looks like a great round. In my personal unscientific tests, the bullets expand 100% of the time, no matter what kind of barrier I use. I'm sold on them. I carry EFMJ in my .45's and Critical Defense in my .40's. They are expensive and not meant for plinking or target shooting, but defense of your life or that of a loved one, is not a place to go cheap.
That's my experience and opinion. Your mileage may vary.
U.S. Navy Veteran '65-'69
Retired Police Detective '71 - '01
NRA Life Member / SAF Member
U.S. Constitution (c) 1791, All Rights Reserved.
By BRTCP88 in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: October 7th, 2010, 05:51 PM
By tangoseal in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: June 26th, 2009, 09:25 PM
By Miggy in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Last Post: January 1st, 2008, 09:52 PM
By Rob99VMI04 in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Last Post: December 9th, 2007, 09:38 PM
By QKShooter in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Last Post: February 12th, 2006, 02:11 PM