This is a discussion on 357 vs. 45 ? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by BikerRN I met the Internet version of the "boogieman" in a professional capacity. This was one person that literally scared me. I ...
I would rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on Earth.--Steve McQueen
What are you able to shoot well? Shot placement.....380 or 500 Magnum...can you shoot it well enough to defend yourself under stress? Hopefully the majority of us will never have to find out....
Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.
Would not want to get hit by any of them, nuff said.
I have both and prefer the 45...I like bigger holes! They tend to leak more.
I dont trust a handgun calibar bullet to KNOCK DOWN someone...so I want blood loss! IMHO bigger is better.
To err is human.
To forgive is divine.
Neither of which is Marine Corps policy.
"It's all about shot placement."- David (Slayer of Goliath)
I have both calibers and feel equally confident in the end results of each.
"Don't start none, won't be none!"
"...I'm reaching the point where tha bark and bang is reaching the point of diminishing returns for me. I'm at the age where I'm starting to notice the stiff elbows and sore wrist."
No Biker! Say it isn't so. Surly we can't be gettin' old yet.
“No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.”
Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893
Both .357 Mag and .38 Spec use .357 caliber bullets, not .38. Cartridge name is meaningless wrt bore/bullet size as the two are rarely the same. .270<>.277, .30-06<>.308, .44<>.429, ...
Would a Colt Delta Elite be a nice compromise? 10mm punch in a 1911 style package!
Good lord I need about 20 grand to fund all my must have guns
Still never heard back from the OP as to where his question was headed... 3 days and 50+ posts later.
I wonder if he had a real question or just wanted to stir the pot!
NRA Endowment Member
only one way to settle this, pistols at 20 paces, lol
Mossberg 590a1 12g 20" 8+1 Spedfeeder, modified Limbsaver butt.<>Glock G30 45 auto<>Beretta 92FS 9mm Inox
<>Smith & Wession 360 357mag<>Marlin 60ss, Bushnell 3-9 scope<>Kel-Tec Sub2k 9mm Glock mags, quick release red dot sight<>
All I need Is a Sig 226 .40. And .556 tactical carbine of some sort.
I don't think Billy Badass attacking you will give a hoot what it is when he is hit with it. Generally though I have read that a .357 round being a hotter load with more velocity causes more shock trauma than a .45acp which is traveling slower. The .45acp will tear more tissue as it passes through creating a larger wound channel, but won't produce the same type of surrounding shock trauma generally speaking. Not that I am an expert but my reading has always come to this conclusion. Then there is Dr. Roberts who's studies show that a fast moving .357sig round does about the same damage as a .45acp in the "shock trauma" department.
Notice how the .357sig traveling at 1319fps is doing about the same damage as any other round and penetrates to the same depth (past 12"). What this tells me is that it doesn't matter as long as you hit the target. Shot placement is the winner.
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.