9mm or .40? defense ammo
This is a discussion on 9mm or .40? defense ammo within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by snakyjake
Just to get you started:
http://www.defensivecarry.com/forum/...rspective.html
Just because something is bigger and has more energy doesn't mean it is going to ...
21Likes
-
July 8th, 2011 05:52 PM
#31
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
snakyjake
Just to get you started:
http://www.defensivecarry.com/forum/...rspective.html
Just because something is bigger and has more energy doesn't mean it is going to make a difference. It's still too small. I don't know how else to explain this! It's like every time a rocket takes off from Earth, the rocket moves the Earth. Did it change Earth's orbit?
So the real debate becomes how small the difference. According to the studies, the difference is small enough that it cannot be measured in real life. And that's why you still see 9 mm (and 40) being used by law enforcement and world militaries.
All else, it just comes down to someone's "feelings" or maybe someone's anecdotal evidence.
I beg to differ that the diffetence is negligable. fact, bigger bullet eqauls bigger would cavity. which eqauls quicker incapacitation. a .45 cal bullet, or . 40, in this case, will make a bigger hole then a .38 cal bullet plain and simple. bigger hole means more blood loss faster=threat eliminated fastef
Sent from my LS670 using Tapatalk
"Anyone worth shooting, is probably worth shooting several times."
-
July 8th, 2011 05:52 PM
Remove Ads
-
July 9th, 2011 12:40 AM
#32
Senior Member
Array
Let us focus on the gun here for a sec.
Some guns shoot better in some calibers than others. Throw that in the pot and we can help you narrow down an answer for yourself.
The maximum effective range of an excuse is zero meters.
-
July 9th, 2011 01:25 AM
#33
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
thebigdl86
I beg to differ that the diffetence is negligable. fact, bigger bullet eqauls bigger would cavity. which eqauls quicker incapacitation. a .45 cal bullet, or . 40, in this case, will make a bigger hole then a .38 cal bullet plain and simple. bigger hole means more blood loss faster=threat eliminated fastef
How much time do you think it would take to incapacitate someone by blood drainage or a bigger wound cavity? Talk to some people who have shot animals with high power rifles how long it takes to bring down an animal when they don't hit a vital.
-
July 9th, 2011 05:56 AM
#34
Senior Member
Array
I have owned them both. I love them both. I carry the 9mm only due to the cost of the ammo. I do hit better with the 9mm. Unexplained. Perhaps it was the weapon. .40 was a Beretta and the 9mm is a Sig. Could have been recoil anticipation. Personally if I could conceal a 12 gauge tactical with 00 buck I would. To hell with recoil. Blow a hole in it and be done.
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
Ronald Reagan
-
July 9th, 2011 07:59 PM
#35
Member
Array
I prefer 9mm to keep all my ammo stock consistent. I may venture into buying a 45 down the road.....but will most likely stay away from a .40
Try before you buy....
"A free people ought to be armed." - George Washington
-
July 10th, 2011 02:08 AM
#36
Distinguished Member
Array
Hahahahahahaha.....a gun clerk said that the .40 would be obsolete in 10 years.
The only way that will happen is if Gamma Death Ray-guns become avaliable for concealed carry.
I carry both. Positives and negatives with each. Both are viable SD rounds that will do the job provided you do yours.
If you are an inexperienced shooter then I would lean towards the 9mm. The .40 is not the best gun to try to learn on.
Why Ike, whatever do you mean? Maybe poker's just not your game Ike. I know! Let's have a spelling contest!

-
July 10th, 2011 02:52 AM
#37
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
snakyjake
How much time do you think it would take to incapacitate someone by blood drainage or a bigger wound cavity? Talk to some people who have shot animals with high power rifles how long it takes to bring down an animal when they don't hit a vital.
I regularly hunt wild boar, and have inacapacitated one with a single corbon power ball w/o hiting any vitals in less then 10 seconds. I have attempted the same thing with my g19 several times with different loads and had no such luck. it almost always takes 2 sometimes 3 9mm rnds for the same kind of kill. not talking percision shooting here cause I usually drop them with 1 .22 lr behind the ear, im saying just shooting torso purely for ammo testing sake. the expanded diameter after recovery the .45 dwarfes the 9mm.
Sent from my LS670 using Tapatalk
"Anyone worth shooting, is probably worth shooting several times."
-
July 11th, 2011 01:41 AM
#38
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
thebigdl86
I beg to differ that the diffetence is negligable. fact, bigger bullet eqauls bigger would cavity. which eqauls quicker incapacitation. a .45 cal bullet, or . 40, in this case, will make a bigger hole then a .38 cal bullet plain and simple. bigger hole means more blood loss faster=threat eliminated fastef
Sent from my LS670 using Tapatalk
While I would agree that a bigger bullet can increase the wound cavity, I am still not convinced that the difference between .35 (9mm) and .39 (40) caliber is so significant that the best bullets and loads can't minimize it.
Yes, more blood loss does incapacitate faster, but if both bullets hit the would-be killer in the same spot and both expand to .50 or .60 caliber, the net incapacitation effect, to me, is going to be much the same. At that point, a 9 is a 40 is a 45.
I once believed that all serious pistol calibers began with a "4". I now believe that a lawfully-armed citizen or lawman armed with a 9mm or 38 and above who can place their shots properly is best armed of all, as long as they are armed with quality expanding ammunition.
Once upon a time, bullet expansion was far less reliable and bullet design was not what it is today. Expansion could not be counted on. Back then, a person truly needed a "4 and above" more so than today, IMO.
-
July 19th, 2011 01:11 AM
#39
Member
Array
Rented a G23 the 0ther day and I can say it kicks, and I like it! I have actually been looking for a used one to aide me in my weapon collecting disease.
And here is some interesting yet worthless information I just picked up today at my wifes concealed carry class. The wichita, KS police department is switching from .40's over to 9mm's. I'm told one reasons is cost savings. I believe that to be a B.S. answer however I thought it was interesting when I heard it. I have looked at buying .40 ammo in bulk and its not much more money than 9mm ammo. .45 ammo is a different story on the cheap side its 80.00 more per thosand rounds of .40 ammo. Being a gun freak I like them all and will continue to till there is a better way to take care of business.
Last edited by ConcealedG30; July 19th, 2011 at 01:13 AM.
Reason: missing word
-
July 19th, 2011 01:36 AM
#40
Member
Array
In over 40 years of carrying a firearm, I've tried just about everything you could think of. I prefer something that is flat shooting, powerful and accurate. That being said, it doesn't matter how flat shooting, powerful or accurate a round is, if a person can't hit what they are aiming at, the round is useless. I have and do carry a .45, a .40, a .357 SIG, a .38, a .380, and .22 LR and Magnum. All will kill if shot placement is on target. With the new technology available in ammunition design and powder formulation, all can be potent 'man-stoppers'.
Practically, for me, I prefer the larger calibers but will readily carry my CZ82 in 9mm MAK, my Bersa in .380, my CZ RAMI in .40and my American Classic and Kimber, both in .45. My wheel gun favorites are .38 Special, .357 magnum and a .44 Special.
A note: An Israeli exchange officer I knew, a Col. David (Daveed), could consistently place 7 rounds of .22 from a Beretta, in a space the size of an orange at 7 yards rapid fire. But then GySgt Jessup could do the same thing with a .45.
To each his/her own......
-
July 27th, 2011 05:28 PM
#41
Member
Array
It was inevitable after I rented one, I had to have one. Picked up a G23 today. 
All is good, everyone love a happy ending.
-
July 27th, 2011 07:56 PM
#42
Member
Array
Both calibers work well. I favor 9MM because of reduced recoil, for target accuracy when firing during rapid fire drills and for cost.
You can get a dozen terrific defensive loads in 9MM. All will do the trick for self defense.
-
July 28th, 2011 09:06 PM
#43
Distinguished Member
Array
Hmmm, Interesting thread. Been thinking about trading my Kahr MK9 for a Kahr K40 (the MK9 is just to small) like the larger grip frame on the K series opposed to the MK series. Why a .40? Guess I think I'll get more thump. But yeah, you guys are right its shot placement. Maybe I'll trade for a K 9 instead.
That said my EDC are 1911 .45's The .45 acp is such an easy case to reload. But 9 mm factory ammo is so cheap why reload it? So if I Buy the .40 I buy the reloading dies & if I don't like the .40------- yeah its shot placement, now I'm thinking 9.
-
July 28th, 2011 11:22 PM
#44
Ex Member
Array

Originally Posted by
ConcealedG30
It was inevitable after I rented one, I had to have one. Picked up a G23 today.
All is good, everyone love a happy ending.
Congrats! Be sure to post pics when you get a chance :)
Don't sniff that new gun smell too much, though.
-
July 29th, 2011 12:25 AM
#45
Member
Array
The way I've always approached the caliber wars is this:
1: "With my 9mm, I have 16 chances to hit the lungs, heart and head, your 45 has 9."
2: "But I have 2 extra magazines"
1: "So do I, I now have 46 chances, you have 25."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
.40 ammo vs 9mm
, .40 vs 9mm ballistics
, 40 vs 9mm ballistics
, 9mm ammo vs .40
, 9mm ammo vs .40 ammo
, 9mm or .40
, 9mm or 40
, 9mm vs .40
, 9mm vs .40 ammo
, 9mm vs .40 ballistics
, 9mm vs 40
, 9mm vs 40 ammo
, 9mm vs 40 ballistics
, ballistics 9mm vs 40
, size difference between 9mm and .40