Probably falling asleep. My hair is salt and pepper, lol.
This is a discussion on Is 115 grain 9mm ammo for self-defense becoming obsolete? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by glockman10mm Energy transfer, or so called " shocking power" is to a handgun what Zeus and Hercules are to Greek mythology. Gman, ...
Zeus is Greek, Hercules is Roman.
Jupiter is the Roman Zeus, and Heracles is the Greek Hercules.
Kinda reminds me of a college drinking buddy as we headed to brekkers at 4 am... "a night without orange juice is like a night without the sun"...
*what's left of the hair on top is blonde, so it's OK for me to crack blonde jokes
AZCDL Life Member
NRA Patron Member
NROI Chief Range Officer
Probably falling asleep. My hair is salt and pepper, lol.
" Blessed is that man, who when facing death, thinks only of his front sight"
It's still gotta be better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick!
I'm sure as hollowpoint technology progresses, bullet weight will be less of an issue.
"Historical examination of the right to bear arms, from English antecedents to the drafting of the Second Amendment, bears proof that the right to bear arms has consistently been, and should still be, construed as an individual right." -- U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings, Re: U.S. vs Emerson (1999)
I feel that if hollow point technology increases we'll be able to see heavier bullets that still perform without the need for speed. Of course the buying public is apparently geared for speed above all other considerations. So, we'll probably always have speedy ammo available.
I don't happen to think that, in the past 30 years, hollow point technology has truly risen to new heights as much as we lead ourselves to believe ... or allow marketing and forums lead us to believe.
The cost of "performance" ammo has certainly risen though.
Charter Member of the DC .41 LC Society "Get heeled! No really"
“No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.”
Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893
Yeah, I'm asleep, but even in my sleep I still choose the heavy stuff because on average the heavier rounds tend to penetrate one to two inches deeper.... Deeper is better IMO. YMMV.
I'm going to take some engineering guesses:
1. 115gr is becoming more popular (Cor-bon DPX, Hornady Critical Defense, etc) because of improved bullet design. I think previous 115 generations did not perform too well because of older technology (i.e. bullet fragmentation). Maybe bullet fragmentation was not just because of weight (grain), but also because of thinner weaker material. Perhaps new designs bullets are less likely to fragment (all copper design). I have several selections of hollow points, and it is interesting to see the design differences.
2. Guns with heavy springs have cycling problems with standard loads, therefore +p improved reliability. I think most non-US guns are designed around NATO standards, and need a bit more pressure than standard pressure. For hollow points in the U.S., that is going to mean +p.
3. Some guns don't like 147 gr.
4. Some guns manufacturers do not recommend +p.
5. I think 124gr +p is the most popular because it is the median average, not at the extreme ends of the spectrum of choices. It works the best in more pistols.
I also try to read up what other agencies are doing around the world (why limit ourselves). It sure seems like America is obsessed with diameter, others are more concerned about putting the maximum holes into a body (fire power).
If I wanted to use 115gr round I'd use one of my .380's... Just sayin.
The difference between the "experts" and ALL of us on forums is this, we have bias that shapes our judgement, true experts in their field are immune to that. So none of the banter in these recent threads about heavy versus light are anything more than each respondent (myself included) stating his or her opinion from their own biased point of view. Which in some ways is a good thing, because that means you are passionate and also that you have confidence in your chosen weapon.
And I submit to you that a confident person with ANY premium ammo (that can hit where they aim) is going to do the best they possibly can if (God forbid) any of them did have to fire at a live person.
Funny thing is, thugs and bad guys have been killing each other since the gun was invented. And I dare say that .50 Cent or the BTK killer searched the forums to find the best weight bullet. And furthermore, ever watch videos of real shootings? What do MOST (not all, but 95%)have in common? As soon as the gun comes out, the other dude starts running away. If you pull a 380 on me, I promise I won't stare at the barrel long enough to see it is a small hole, I'm hauling tail the other way.
Deeper is not better, guys. That is a very bad misconception being spread by the ignorant. For centuries, we had complete penetration, and lack of stopping power. Just look at the miserable stopping percentage record of .38 lrn, .36 cap and ball, 9mm ball, .30 Carbine, etc, in spite of having completely exited the man being shot (with many rds, in many cases). Even the lightest, fastest SD jhps bullets fully penetrate big coons. That is 8" or more of penetration, which is plenty. The "arm first" argument is bs, since nobody aims at the arms. So arm hits are actually misses. Why blame the bullet for what is really just operator failure?
Move. Shoot. Survive. ― The "Unofficial" Suarez International Doctrine
“The real man smiles in trouble, gathers strength from distress and grows brave by reflection.” ― Thomas Paine
"[Deeper is not better, guys.]"
That's what all little caliber guys say ; )
A Native Floridian = RARE
IT'S OUR RIGHTS>THEY WANT TO WRONG