This is a discussion on Why Is the .40 S&W So Beat Up On These Days? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; love it. shoot it just fine through G23 and P229. fast follow-ups. never a problem. I don't see much difference in effectiveness between it and ...
love it. shoot it just fine through G23 and P229. fast follow-ups. never a problem. I don't see much difference in effectiveness between it and the 9 but who cares? I want both. I want all. "don't need it" doesn't make any sense to me. it's as viable a choice of a service/defense caliber as any of the others.
I don't understand why people get worked up about a gun in someone else's holster. I couldn't care less what you carry so long as you don't point it at me.
There are only TWO kinds of people in this world; those who describe the world as filled with two kinds of people...and those who don't.
I like the 40 in the 10 mm version. If I want to shot with "less" recoil, I just down loaded it:)
Never had any trouble with my 229, and my new 23 runs well so far. Just another cartridge that will do the job.
I really like my CW40 Kahr, it's just the rite size, just a little better than my CW45 but I won't put up with the probematicle cartridge.
Charles, I've seen that first image before and I will refute it with the following. I took each caliber and converted to mm if not already in it. .40 is 10.2mm and .45 is 11.5mm. I took those figures and multiplied by 10, giving us 90, 102 and 115. I then took a round brush in Photoshop and created circles of 90, 102 and 115 pixels diameter. I then lined up the bottoms of the circles. The following image is what you get:
As you can see, the difference in calibers is greater than your image shows. I'm not sure how they went about doing the one you posted, but I've told you every step I took in the process.
WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.
I'm back on a 40 again after 2 previous attempts. I didn't like the previous guns and I didn't like the muzzle flip of the caliber. I like the dynamics of the 40 but it just didn't work. Back to the 45. Now I'm into my 3rd 40 platform and the ergonomics have settled the muzzle flip....or my brain is telling me so. Doesn't matter, I'm happy and that's all I was looking for. I may get back into a 10 again just to grow the family. More fun on the bench.
What if the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about?
This is an excerpt from Ignatio Piazza's response to the question of which caliber should you use for personal self-defense:
The standard response that you should train to have, with a major-caliber handgun (calibers with a “4” in them) such as .45, 44, 10mm (a hot .40 caliber) and .40 S&W, is two quick hits to the thoracic cavity.
That should be the standard response with minor calibers as well (calibers smaller than the “4’s” but larger or hotter than .380) such as 9mm. But be prepared to deliver a shot to the cranio-ocular cavity (between the eyebrows and moustache) to stop the fight if they don’t immediately drop. Our troops in Iraq are reporting that when using the 9mm Berettas, three or four hits to the chest are required to stop attackers.
My opinion, which is not worth much on the stock market, is shoot whatever the hell ya want and are comfortable with....it is all about being comfortable and hitting what your shooting at...i do not want to be shot with a 22, 9mm 40 , 45 or anything under or over those ..... i feel very confident shooting the 40, and can double tap very nicely with it...if that does not get your attention, you get two double taps......
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American GI. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
I asked my stock broker the other day, what I should be investing in ....his reply, canned goods n ammo !!!
A Beretta 96 was the first handgun I shot. Now my EDC is a Springfield XD40.
What I think is interesting is how people decide on their cartridge of choice. A lot of folks consider 9mm to be the "minimum" that should be used for EDC. I bet if there was a slightly smaller cartridge (than 9mm) and the general consensus was that it was acceptable for self defense, than that is was a lot of people would carry. Larger calibers are harder to shoot quickly and accurately. As a general rule people don't like to do what's hard. Personally, when it comes to my life and the lives of those I care about, I don't want to be using the "minimum".
"Hell is truth seen too late."
I don't care about what they say regarding the .40. As long as they continue to manufacture it and doesn't get way too expensive to shoot, I am going to continue to stick with it. Since I have an H&K USP in that caliber, recoil feels like a 9mm as a result of its recoil reduction system. So recoil is never an issue with me.