I Say This Is BS - What Say You ? - Page 3

I Say This Is BS - What Say You ?

This is a discussion on I Say This Is BS - What Say You ? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; OOPs.....where the heck did that double post come from? sawwwry...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: I Say This Is BS - What Say You ?

  1. #31
    VIP Member Array CLASS3NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Bob from Southern New Hampshire
    OOPs.....where the heck did that double post come from? sawwwry
    Why Waltz when you can Rock-N-Roll

  2. #32
    VIP Member Array Old Chief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Southwest Tennessee
    You can definately throw the BS flag on this one.
    When you accept mediocrity you sow the seeds for future failure.
    One should never confuse good fortune with good training.
    Illegitimus Non Carborundum. In God we trust.

  3. #33
    VIP Member
    Array dr_cmg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Even with a live round in the chamber I don't see how it could be set off. The fact that the rod was a very close fit indicates that it would not likely strike the primer, unless the idiot had a jag on the rod. Now that would be beyond stupid.

    Live round stuck in barrel, gunsmith (and I use the term advisedly) decides to us a rod that is a close fit to drive it out, so he puts a jag on the rod and proceeds to fire the round. I see one possibility for this scenario - the gunsmith knows the casing cannot go through the barrel and decides to use a tight rod with jag to fire the round and then to push the casing out after the round is fired. I don't know which is stupider doing it by accident or doing it on purpose. Either way he would never be able to even see my guns.

    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Array gimpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    I'm sorry but I am totally confused about this story. At first I thought how in the world could a bullet, after being fired from a cartridge have enough residual powder behind it to cause such an incident. After reading the article again and thinking about it, I wonder if the gun/rifle could be something from the civil war era. One where powder is poured down the muzzle, then the bullet (e.g., a minie ball) is rammed home. Should the gun misfire as in the powder being somewhat damp and not delivering all the needed energy to the bullet, it would be feasible that there could be sufficient powder remaining behind the bullet. Of course, I don't know of any civil war muzzle loading rifles that provide access to the breech end such as described in the article, but there is always the possibility that the gunsmith disassembled the rifle to the point where he gained access to the breech end. Given only the information provided, I don't understand how this could happen.
    "Society never advances. It recedes as fast on one side as it gains on the other. It undergoes continual change; but this change is not [an improvement]. For everything that is given, something is taken."
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts