Keith style SWCs for defensive use

This is a discussion on Keith style SWCs for defensive use within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; My experience with BB's. 38+P through my LCR is that it's pretty hot. If you like spicy that much then go for. 357....

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
Like Tree19Likes

Thread: Keith style SWCs for defensive use

  1. January 22nd, 2013 11:27 PM #31
    Doghandler Contrib Icon
    Doghandler is offline
    Senior Member
    Array Doghandler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Branch
    Posts
    767

    Re: Keith style SWCs for defensive use

    My experience with BB's. 38+P through my LCR is that it's pretty hot. If you like spicy that much then go for. 357.
    There is a solution but we are not Jedi... not yet.
    Doghandler
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. January 22nd, 2013 11:27 PM Remove Ads
    DefensiveCarry.com
  3. January 22nd, 2013 11:45 PM #32
    azretired
    azretired is offline
    Member Array azretired's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    143
    I've been loading and using LSWC bullets for defensive use for years. I have full confidence in them.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. January 23rd, 2013 08:40 AM #33
    shooterX Contrib Icon
    shooterX is offline
    VIP Member
    Array shooterX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,840
    Quote Originally Posted by 10thmtn View Post
    No, based on some PMs with Glockman10mm, I don't think the additional recoil and slower follow up shot times would be worth it. Not to mention the cost of their ammo. I'll stick with the standard pressure loads.
    They do make a low flash, low recoil standard pressure load, not just +p loadings. I do agree with you about the price, which is why I only have one box at the moment.
    "Don't start none, won't be none!"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. January 23rd, 2013 11:31 AM #34
    481
    481 is offline
    Member Array 481's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by shooterX View Post
    They do make a low flash, low recoil standard pressure load, not just +p loadings. I do agree with you about the price, which is why I only have one box at the moment.
    IIRC, and maybe I am not, I was under the impression that all of BB are loaded with flash-supressed powders.
    My favorite "gun" book-

    QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. February 3rd, 2013 05:50 PM #35
    Rem700
    Rem700 is offline
    Member Array Rem700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    160
    Ruger Alaskan

    200gr WC
    200-240gr SWC
    240gr FN
    280gr WFN

    which would be best for sd?
    Last edited by Rem700; February 3rd, 2013 at 07:13 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Search tags for this page

.38 semi wadcutter
,

.44 special swc penetration

,
.44 special wadcutter loads jell test
,
44 special wadcutter
,

keith style .38 lswc ammo

,
keith style bullet test 38
,
keith swc for defense
,
kieth style bullets balistic tests
,
teddy roosevelt guotes repidity of fire is no excuse for lack of aim
,
tissue damage of a full wadcutter in .38 at 800 fps?