One shot - or follow-ups?

This is a discussion on One shot - or follow-ups? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; OK nothing original here - just a slant on old material really. I carry the SIG now and with 15+1 +P feel it is a ...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: One shot - or follow-ups?

  1. #1
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484

    One shot - or follow-ups?

    OK nothing original here - just a slant on old material really.

    I carry the SIG now and with 15+1 +P feel it is a good option for me. I am shooting it better and better and know what I can do with two or three quick shots.

    But - consider an extreme ( ignore the absurdity factor!) - if (IF) you carried instead something huge like a short barrel .454, hot loaded .44 even - and we assume that you are able to control this for one quick and well placed shot (follow-ups being by default slow) - might it actually be more effective, than multiple well placed shots from something like my SIG? Or your 1911.

    As I said this is only an old subject but with a slight slant... that way perhaps you won't kick me!

    So - would that one big shot - say a foot ton energy - translate into better effect. Let's forget about over penetration - just whether the ''grand slam'' might be all that's needed. I am also not trying to get into the ramifications of old faithfulls like ''energy dump'', ''one shot stop'' etc - simply going for a straight opinion.

    I tend to think of pretty massive damage and shock - but might it actually be a put-down? - assume if you will a shot absolute COM. I don't BTW intend to change my carry but you might know now how I love fishing
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array Euclidean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,213
    Hmmmm sticky question.

    Assuming shot placement was always the same, Is it better to shoot someone once with a 240 grain .44 Magnum catridge or three times with a .380 seems to be the question.

    I submit yes if you could exhibit the exact same level of accuracy with some very high powered caliber as you do with a lower powered caliber, you should go with the more powerful catridge.

    Your motivation should be to stop your attacker. If you can use a better tool, use a better tool.

    I don't believe in one shot stopping either. I think it's a myth as far as handguns are concerned. But I do believe that minimizing the number of rounds fired is both ethical and prudent. I mean you do want to shock that CNS ASAP right?

    However I live in the real world where magnum rounds are difficult to control. I settle for the light, easy to shoot catridges and resign myself to the fact I'd better plan on shooting twice or more.

    Then again I'm something of a weirdo when it comes to capacity in the first place. For most people it's the main criteria, or at least a major consideration, but as long as it's at least five or six I've never really cared how many rounds it holds as long as it shoots well. It's not that I don't care, it's just not as important to me.

    One thing does occur to me however. There are some huge, huge people out there. I'm not sure even 2 or 3 service catridge bullets would stop them. Of course this isn't the norm but we are speculating.

  4. #3
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,311

    Chris

    Heckfire...You are on the ball with some Hot Smokin' Thread Topics these days!
    OK...EXACT Center Of Mass? ~
    My very best guess (since I am not the county coroner) would be that a perfectly placed fast multiple of three with good penetration would be equally as effective as one Hot Heavy .44 Cannon Ball & would certainly "shake a body up a bit" ~ I would say that you are very well protected with your 3 hits COM.
    Your "Perfect Triad" might actually be much more effective.

    Ask Me Why...I'll answer tomorrow.
    Right now...I'm jumping off.
    Cripes it's 11 PM already & I still have Real Work to get finished tonight.
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  5. #4
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Hehe - real work!! QK - I have some of that too - but hey - procrastination is my second name!

    Euc - what I was thinking re ''big stuff'' was - and re your ''magnum rounds are difficult to control." .... the first (and only) shot from a bigger piece will not be any harder (IMO) to fire. This is the big point. It is only recovery from such a beast that would create delays and maybe too inaccuracy. Thus my cogitating on the usefulness of the one mega hit - and forget any more. Well fast follows anyways.

    This is as I said pure fishing - but I do so relish thoughts from others - every so often someone comes up with some aspect I never even thought of and then - I am enlightened. That's why this and gun forums in general can be so useful - it is all part of learning, even at my age!!

    (but you have to endure my ramblings tho for this to occur!)
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  6. #5
    VIP Member Array Euclidean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,213
    Well when you put it that way...

    To be honest if I knew all of my potential attackers would be solo attackers, and never indoors, I'd carry a monster round.

    If we're hitting exact COM every time, the accuracy is a given. I still stick with the high powered catridge vs. the three lesser catridges.

    But I must ask you how big of a gap are we talking about here? Are we talking three rounds of 32 ACP vs. 1 round of 480 Ruger or are we talking 3 rounds of .45 ACP vs. 1 round of .44 Magnum?

    Because in the former I take the lone catridge, but in the latter I take the triad.

  7. #6
    sm
    sm is offline
    Member Array sm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    127
    I think when Chris eats Hot Wings it causes him to ponder a bit much.

    Gee what a topic?

    I believe in shooting until the threat is no more.

    I have seen small folks hyped on 'scripted meds, like the 13 y/o girl weighing about 90 #'s sopping wet in a Private Hosptial when I did a rotation...she blew by two BIG security guards, took three to stop her ( get her down).

    Also seen the 350# guy on Crack take on 5 Big LEOs

    What I did with new students is use Jim H's method. Fold a sheet of typing paper in half, then fold again. [quartered] Five yds and five rds. Preferred from concealment, low ready was used as well. At the sound of the buzzer draw and fire 5 rds.

    We did this with a variery of platforms and calibers, the typing paper and times revealed what platform and caliber that shooter shot best for them.

    WE also had some older folks, say with arthritis, they may have once been able to shoot a .357, the times and paper told them/ us going to .38spl was actually better.

    Some even "hesitated" on the first shot anticipating recoil. Granted a training problem - then again a real physical one due to arthritis.

    I have some older folks I know that cannot / do not CCW. At home they only firearm they can use effectively is a .410 shotgun with slugs. Yes they practice best can, shooting and reloading. The comfort of only one rd is NOT as comforting as the ability to fire more rds quickly to stop that threat - or multiple threats.

    Physical limits, still comforting to at least be able to use "something" and always taking preventative measure, and hoping it never is needed.
    Use Enough Gun

  8. #7
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    I think when Chris eats Hot Wings it causes him to ponder a bit much.
    Hey Steve - it's back to last Thursday since Bonnie and I had wings!!!

    Sure - as ever - something better than nothing re a weapon.

    I recall - tho darned if I can find the pic - a chest injury from a .44 mag or bigger - on a corpse - it was frankly ''devastating''. Like as not - it went intercostal so no bone frag or impedance to the bullet but heck - whatever it was expanded and - well, macerated would suit fine!!! Could have been 4th/5th intercostal and so a heart or aorta impact but - was that ever a sight.

    No CNS but - I'd imagine a pretty rapid depression of BP before actual bleed-out. Bit like accelerated anaphylactic shock!

    This is why I am playing with the one mega hit thinking.

    Anyways Steve - you know I am ''imaginative'' - you've seen it before LOL!

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Euc - forget 32 acp - I am only considering 9mm and up. No disrespect to 32 or even .380 come to that.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array Euclidean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,213
    Okay if we're only talking about service calibers on up, it's probably the triad unless it's a truly ridiculous case like a triad of 115 grain FMJ 9mm catridges versus .500 S&W Magnum.

    If I didn't know the calibers involved and someone said either shoot 3 times with a weaker caliber or once with a more powerful caliber, I'd err on the side of shooting more because the goal is to stop.

    But if I knew how extreme the gap was, I might be inclined to go with the one big shot. It just seems to me that one sudden substantially more massive wound has a better chance of stopping someone than a series of smaller wounds, but the difference has to be very great indeed.

    Of course this is just meant as a theoretical excercise, so I think it's safe to assume in the real world we take other factors into consideration which essentially relegate this debate to a status of non importance.

    But boy it sure is fun to ponder it.

    See I keep thinking about a conversation I had recently that I was reminded o f in that bear attack thread. Someone remarked that if he ever got attacked by a bear, he'd want the highest possible capacity pistol so he could shoot the bear as many times as possible. I countered that I'd much rather have a nice, big, heavy revolver that fired the most powerful round possible, probably 454. Neither one of us could convince the other he was wrong.

  10. #9
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Euc - chances are (i hope like heck) we will never have to find out!
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  11. #10
    sm
    sm is offline
    Member Array sm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    127
    Chris as you know I grew up reading Ruark. Ruark just "knew" that leopard.he shot was down - it was not. He had broken the rule to Always shoot again.

    You know, for the others that don't I used to work in the main OR. I was also allowed to view some files and photos.

    I was there the night a guy came in and stuck a model 66 in his mouth with full .357 load and pulled the trigger. He did not die, he did lose some teeth, some sinuses, ...and did get a free pass to the Psych Hosptial.

    One guy came in with multiple .45 and 9mm wounds - from toes to head..he lived.

    The .44spl to the Femoral artery victim died , we did the harvest for organs. The .22 lr victim was shot from ~ 7 feet. Bullet struck the "sword" [ oh phooey, the midst of where ribs connect...*something* sword] anyway a fragment of this bone took out the SA Node, dead.

    Hence the reason I don't get into Holy Grails for Firearms, platforms, calibers and such. I do believe in "Use Enough Gun" - I put a lot of value in shot placement.

    Too many variables, in the blink of an eye one may to defend themselves and being the "firstest with the mostest" , and continuing until threat is stopped .

    I'd like to think one big caliber would do so....then again assume nothing and take no chances.

    FWIW - the worst "cut" I have seen that killed someone - was not a knife, instead a jagged beer bottle. Carotid artery. Again "placement" is the key.
    Use Enough Gun

  12. #11
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Steve - indeed - as ever, assume nothing. Way to go. I still feel well ''comfortable'' with my 15+1!

    As for busted beer bottle - man, that is potentially as or more lethal than a small very sharp blade. Carotid section = quick demise - that's for sure. Ouch!

    So many ways to die!!
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  13. #12
    sm
    sm is offline
    Member Array sm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    127
    Chris,
    No doubt that I have been dubbed "traditional" or "old school" - heck I even refer to myself as such.

    Granted I have stayed with the same platforms and calibers since I was a pup. Yes I have some more "modern".

    I have always believed in the basics, learning the basics correctly.

    I have nothing against new technology - be it firearms, ammo, training, or whatever.

    Just the way I see it , we keep learning the basics over and over , we get the platform that fits "us" for the task and keep the mindset and brain working. We hope we never have to use these.

    What elephants I have had....I never turned down any luck that happened as well. Goodness knows Murphy is always around to mess things up.

    One reads about the "hog legs" of the Old West. Most folks could not afford a Colt. Many 'killings" were with smaller calibers of lesser known makes at ranges the folks could hit what aimed at [ shot placment] .

    I'll take advantage of our friendship here.

    Your R9 is akin to the small .36 cal revos of old. Conceals and you place shots fast and accurate.

    For another a J Frame Snub is what works for them.

    Heck even that old '28 Det Spl I have , and have been shooting will do that for me. Took it out and eradicated some rabid critters just to see - to know what I could do and how fast.

    Great topic .
    Use Enough Gun

  14. #13
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    The Det Special has to be an ol' friend to many - bet lots of old cops say it rings true!

    Despite the over worked phrase - ''whatever works'' has its place.

    I am off to bed Steve in this EDT timezone - catch ya soon dude.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  15. #14
    Member Array AZG23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Surprise, Az
    Posts
    340
    there is no magic chambering...adn no magic bullet...its been shown that there just isnt enough power in a handgun round. Multiple well placed shots are needed. I really cant see a BG knowing the difference between being shot with a .32 or a .45..he just knows he's been hit, if he even knows that in the moment.

    I agree in shoot til there is no more threat/threats. Carry the biggest caliber you shoot well and train often with it.
    Brad B.

  16. #15
    New Member Array rpgrigsby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    10
    If the premise is one perfectly placed shot, it seem logical that it doesn't really matter what caliber is used. We know that .22's kill people with one shot all the time (ask RFK). But since the moment of death and the end of physical motor response aren't the same, it seems the purpose of multiple shots is to inflict massive physical shock on the BG until he loses the physical ability to inflict injury on us. If we fire one great shot into a BG (with a .44 or .22) we don't step back and admire our shot ("Damn, that was a heck of a shot"!!)- we keep jacking lead until the threat is no more.

    Therefore, in answer to your hypothetical, give me any good handgun caliber and multiple shots versus one, BIG BANG all-or-nothing shot anyday!!

    IMHO, of course!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. VA to Follow AZ?
    By DaveJay in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: June 22nd, 2010, 10:34 PM
  2. Follow-Up Thread / Sig RCS
    By Pizza Bob in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 1st, 2009, 06:22 PM
  3. Glock 19/26 Follow Up ??
    By SaddleSC in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: April 2nd, 2009, 12:16 AM
  4. Follow up
    By Argus in forum Reloading
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: January 28th, 2008, 09:29 AM

Search tags for this page

mozambique

Click on a term to search for related topics.